US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There's an interesting technological revolution that took off around the time Kennedy became the president: https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/The_First_Televised_Presidential_Debate.htm

Though Kennedy's election wasn't the first televised presidential debate, TV was still in its infancy. I watched some shit on YouTube that said when Abraham Lincoln did speeches/rallies/debates they would be like 4 fucking hours long and go into things with depth and complexity when Kennedy came around they dumbed down things to fit into like 4 minutes.

So I guess I would just add "television/1960s TikTok" to you saying he got elected "based on his name, wealth and looks". I haven't seen the presidential debate from Kennedy's era that got him elected but I can guess he probably worked extremely well in front of a camera and his charisma shined through the TV set.
The debate between him and Nixon had a different Winn depending if you watched or listen, Nixon won if you only listen on radio, Kennedy won if you watched
 

Federal judge blocks Trump's ban on transgender people serving in military​

A federal judge has granted an injunction that temporarily blocks the US military from enforcing Donald Trump’s executive order barring transgender people from military service while a lawsuit by 20 current and would-be service members challenging the measure goes forward.

Judge Ana Reyes stayed her order from going into effect until Friday morning to give the government to seek an emergency appeal.



View attachment 7108696

Archive of the Injunction is attached to the post.
What is the path forward to correct this clear abuse of power?

Does the SC have to do something generally to prevent this from repeating, or must they look at each of these on a case by case basis?

Also, trannies are far and away the most one sided political question: they are universally reviled, because most humans have eyes, and trannies are clearly deranged perverted freaks.

Seriously, this has to stop. I need this to stop before Trump just decides to ignore them totally. That would be crossing the Rubicon and we can't go back from that. Maybe that's the deep states intention?
 
So I guess I would just add "television/1960s TikTok" to you saying he got elected "based on his name, wealth and looks". I haven't seen the presidential debate from Kennedy's era that got him elected but I can guess he probably worked extremely well in front of a camera and his charisma shined through the TV set.
It didn't help that Nixon was sweaty and looked like a flabby old man in comparison. JFK had some other positive qualities but in terms of political acumen at the time I'd say Nixon would have won if it was based on peoples purely objective opinions and not influenced by that. There's a reason FDR hid his wheelchair, people pay attention to that kind of shit and did a lot moreso back then.
 
Team Nothing Ever Happens are this round’s losers. Congrats to Team Total Jewish Cabal Death.
I look forward to the next round.
No one doubted they’d come out, they just will have ZERO new information, and the cia and Jews aren’t gonna write down “lol by the way we shot him and lee harvey oswald was a patsy, hehe don’t tell the goyim”
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: KoopsInk
, people pay attention to that kind of shit and did a lot moreso back then.
it’s just as relevant now. Trump won 2016 because he was like an amazing stand up comedian with the charisma of a king.

He won 2024 because the libs lost their mind and openly shout for white genocide and all kids to be castrated. I don’t think his policies are why he was elected even if most people wanted a stronger border (which Obama was pretty commited to as well, and is second place for most deportation behind Trump.)
 
all scanned files, not text you can search
I'm not at my computer but there are online tools like smallpdf.com that will convert PDF to ocr. I used it for digitizing files at my last job. There's a cool down timer between files without paying though. Just fyi.
 
What is the path forward to correct this clear abuse of power?

Does the SC have to do something generally to prevent this from repeating, or must they look at each of these on a case by case basis?

Also, trannies are far and away the most one sided political question: they are universally reviled, because most humans have eyes, and trannies are clearly deranged perverted freaks.

Seriously, this has to stop. I need this to stop before Trump just decides to ignore them totally. That would be crossing the Rubicon and we can't go back from that. Maybe that's the deep states intention?
Supreme Court has to be called upon to my understanding but there is a possibility if they go against Trump he may choose to go with a "Rubicon crossing" approach.
 
The major thing schools leave out is that most of the “democratically elected” leaders the CIA overthrew were installed by the KGB.

They also never mention that France started the Vietnam War.
I had an argument a few years back about Afghanistan, which regardless of your opinion of gayops in the sandbox, this dumb pinko broad had literally no fucking clue that Afghanistan had a monarchy and just fucking assumed it had a Soviet-aligned communist government since antiquity I guess.

Like it didn't change her opinion, it was just funny to see the jaw drop and gears-almost-turning coming so close to the realization that maybe just maybe the Cold War wasn't a one-sided affair.
 
The cia have absolutely people who's only job is in THEIR words to ((un-people)) selected targets. (no more speculation)
No you didn't read it properly. The "un-people" refers to people they contract for special operations (which could include murder, espionage, spying, intelligence gathering). They're called "un-people" presumably because they're off the books and not officially employed (i.e. they're clandestine operatives).

Furthermore, I believe that document was already released in 2017: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10170-10145.pdf (the PDF metadata states the file was created in 2017), There is an internet archive copy of it dating back to 2022: https://web.archive.org/web/2025000...les/research/jfk/releases/104-10170-10145.pdf

So it is definitely not new news.
 
Alright listen up boys, I have the Central Intelligence Agency's Intelligence Information guide, Its worth millions im sure to rick at pawn stars but Im going to share it with you all here no for free, no need to thank me Im just doing what heros do

1742348022304.png

No one screenshot without permission!
 
Back