US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pull the federal funding.

Seattle declares itself a sanctuary city? Pull funding from the whole state.

Corrupt activist judge issues an order to the government on something they have no jurisdiction over? Pull funding from the whole state.

Schools allowing boys in the girl's locker rooms, bathrooms, and sports? Pull funding from the whole state.

A state bans sale/possession of any type of arms otherwise federally legal, thereby infringing on constitution rights? Pull the funding for the whole state.

Governor ordering police and AG not to assist in or allow ICE to conduct operations? You guessed it, pull funding from the whole state.

We played your fuck ass games and dealt with your weaponization of the law for four (some could argue eight+) years.

No more infinity feral nigger immigrants. No more trannies invading women's spaces. No more grooming children into irrevocable decisions. No more restricting constitutional rights.

No more.
 
but their five films cost $11.5m to produce and generated almost $25m in revenue:
if you factor in marketing that means its a flop,
I know people dislike DW, but the reasoning here is Qanon-tier. "Daily Wire will go bankrupt when Ben Shapiro's bastard child leaves
he's not saying that dumbass, he's using that as proof that his buddy knows shit on the inside. "he told me of another major move before anyone else"
I can unequivocally say that there is absolutely nothing profound within this information. It is insubstantial at best, and outright exaggerations bordering on slander at worst.
It would likely be in everyone's best interest to focus on more pertinent issues as opposed to getting lost in a web of obfuscation.
its the epstein release all over again, just giving people the same shit they released in the years since the event happened.
 
On an unrelated note. I love how reddit's still seething at dems for not doing Bernie again against Trump.

Bernie is socialist. Socialism will never be in America. But not for the reasons they think. Its not because le evil capitalism won't allow it. It's because of people themselves.

Socialism, as an idea, as the concept itself. Is nice. But it's not possible. Why? It requires people to not be... People.

Socialism requires everyone doing everything equally for everyone. And as long as there's greed, there is no socialism. And as long as there's people. There will be greed. And America is greed HQ. There will never be socialism in America. Ever.

Look at all the times socialism has been tried. It always ended with rich getting everything and the commonfolk not even getting bread. It's a nice dream. But it's just that. A dream
A fantasy.

Don't get me started on communism though. That's just dictator with more than one person.
 
Even if he is a socialist smothering Bernie pushed away some people that would have voted for the Dems that first time. Like it or not Bernie was visibly ratfucked.
Yeah. But it was lose lose for the Dems.

Let him run? Yeah he might've put up a fight against Trump with all the gen z who would vote for him. But then you have the disaster that would be his policies in America.

Don't run him? You have those gen z mad and not voting... which is exactly what happened


Lose lose. Win for us
 
If this happens there will be no rational argument that could dissuade me from the opinion that DW was functioning as state funded controlled opposition via a roundabout path of USAID bucks. The timing is too good and I enjoy my reality.
Also they spent a ton of cash on getting Bent Key off the ground. It looks like it didn't work out for them.
 
Even if he is a socialist smothering Bernie pushed away some people that would have voted for the Dems that first time. Like it or not Bernie was visibly ratfucked.
He might have been visibly ratfucked but he was pandering to a base that has a comically low voter turnout. He didn't win because nobody voted for him.

Also, he notably refused to worship at the altar of DEI and preferred to focus on class instead; this was unacceptable to the Democratic Party because making everything about race is part of their religion since Occupy. Saying that class divisions are maybe more important is heresy to them. Even if Bernie is actually a big pharma stooge in reality, implying that not everything is about race was enough for them to destroy whatever marginal chances he had of winning.
 
Socialism, as an idea, as the concept itself. Is nice. But it's not possible. Why? It requires people to not be... People.
It requires brown people to not be brown people. At the end of the day leftists will have to choose between a fair high-trust socialist-lite system or worshiping brown people, and they'll choose the brown people every time.
In the future you'll either have Switzerland style honesty stores or you'll have the other extreme.
payhere.jpgnigsgonnanig.webp
bernie cucked.jpg
 
I legit wonder if the Democratic party is going to learn at all. Maybe? My cuck state governor is actually being surprisingly respectable by talking to people across the aisle and kinda letting go of the troon shit.

It's just so bizarre how Trump basically turned the GOP into the 90s Democratic party minus the gun grabbing lmfao
 
Yeah. But it was lose lose for the Dems.

Let him run? Yeah he might've put up a fight against Trump with all the gen z who would vote for him. But then you have the disaster that would be his policies in America.

Don't run him? You have those gen z mad and not voting... which is exactly what happened


Lose lose. Win for us
They lost the Jaimas tier Dems that could have put in footwork without demanding the actblue money. We're seeing the results now.
I legit wonder if the Democratic party is going to learn at all. Maybe? My cuck state governor is actually being surprisingly respectable by talking to people across the aisle and kinda letting go of the troon shit.

It's just so bizarre how Trump basically turned the GOP into the 90s Democratic party minus the gun grabbing lmfao
They will need a shakeup of the superdelegate system before any meaningful changes will be allowed to happen.
 
It requires brown people to not be brown people. At the end of the day leftists will have to choose between a fair high-trust socialist-lite system or worshiping brown people, and they'll choose the brown people every time.
In the future you'll either have Switzerland style honesty stores or you'll have the other extreme.
View attachment 7110121View attachment 7110122
View attachment 7110125
Nah, I'm all for clowning on browns but this really is just a people in general thing. Soviets weren't majority brown and it still sucked shit.

We could kill every nigger on this earth and still couldn't have socialism. Always gonna be someone who wants it all. Brown white yellow. Don't matter. Greed is universal
 
Judges don't have the ability to do anything at all. The executive branch is the doer. I generally agree that the system is being destabilized; what you are missing is that it's the judges who are doing it because you didn't quite get the nature of their power. The nature of judicial power in our system is to grant or deny political legitimacy to the government. The weakness here is that political legitimacy rests entirely in the minds of the people, and that requires that the people generally perceive judges' rulings as "fair." So if the judges start abusing this power with fantastical, absurd rulings, then the people stop seeing the judiciary as the final authority on which political legitimacy rests. But that is exactly what leftist judges are doing right now, and that, not Donald Trump, is what is destabilizing the system. The less self-aware judges issue rulings like we just saw, where a district court tried to declare that the President has no power to expel foreign invaders from the country without a judge's consent. We've seen a judge rule that the Constitution grants Jim Acosta a personal right to attend White House briefings, and another judge at least float the idea that the President has no power to decide which employees of private news organizations ride with him on Air Force One.
Lawyer fags will tell you about the "political question doctrine." For 200 years the judicial has tried to avoid exactly what is happening now as they knew the power of the Judicial is inherently illusory. Because the Executive owns the guns and historically he who owns the guns just tells you what's up and you do it. Except in the American experiment where we have so far risen above that.

Reference:
 
Charlie Brown has finally realized that Lucy won't ever let him kick the football, no matter how many times he trusts her, so he's decided to go home. Lucy then pouts and cries and shouts at Charlie for breaking the tradition and creating a crisis that might mean that she has to hold the ball in place for once if she ever wants him to play with her again.
Yeah, that's a perfectly reasonable and mature reaction and one we should all strive for in the name of national unity, etc.

But deep in their heart of hearts, most of those types of people want - if not precisely this, then something akin to it--and there's nothing wrong with admitting that.

 
Back