Should we abort all children with Down's Syndrome? - Iceland does it! Do you hate abortion or tards more?

Tubal pregnancies are like a one in a million freak genetic fuckup though. I'd agree that's not an abortion. From my understanding, the fetus would never come to term, and it would just kill the mother if allowed to develop very far along.
"Should I submit my research grant proposal to find a way to successfully gestate aborted babies so they can still grow up? Naw, that'll never get approved by the jury. I'll submit a proposal to transplant uteruses into trannies instead."

💡 We'll use the trannies and their new uteruses as the incubators! That way, I still get to save babies with this research and the degenerates who gatekeep medical research grants still get to do depraved psycho shit PLUS raise the next generation in coomer dungeons! 💡
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: PhoBingas
I tend to side with the aborting, just for practical reasons. They had a tard on TV yesterday who was training to do some Ironman competition, and when interviewed, kept looking over to the side as if being coached and had difficulty with many of the simple questions.

They are usually used as props like this, and it makes me mad. If society at large would stop with that (I don't like this trend of pushing unreality into reality as it is - see also TRANNY TRANNY TRANNY) I'd think differently but since these poor souls just can't be left alone to live their best lives, and are pushed as beauty queens, sports stars and business entrepreneurs, then put them out of their misery as unwitting activists.

Leave them downie kids alone, or we take 'em out back.
 
Downies have a right to life.
Do I also have a right to not provide for them if I dont want to, and to let them starve to death or die from general neglect when they cant care for themselves?
Do you think those downies would still be the happiest of people if they couldn't rely on society to care for them and provide for their basic needs?
 
Do I also have a right to not provide for them if I dont want to, and to let them starve to death or die from general neglect when they cant care for themselves?
Do you think those downies would still be the happiest of people if they couldn't rely on society to care for them and provide for their basic needs?
Happy? No. But neither would the elderly, children, babies, the sick and the injured.
Including us, when we get old and doddery.
I’d prefer not to pay for a lot of things in my taxes, such as wars, infinity dinghy migrants, politicians dodgy expenses, and trooning out kids, but I don’t get a say in where my tax pounds get spent.
Downs kids are hardly the worst the world has to offer. We shouldn’t be enforcing abortion on them. We already have an option, so anyone who doesn’t want to have a kid with such a condition gets to abort and those who are OK with it get to raise them. That seems to cover all bases?
 
If you wouldn't volunteer for it, it's wrong to give it to a child.
 
How would you enforce something like that? There definitely would still be downies that make it to the world, not every woman seeks medical care during pregnancy
It definitely should be an option for all parents but it is impossible to make it a requirement unless every woman is made to visit doctors regularly- which is some leftist utopia levels of dreaming.
 
Only when the tests are absolutely accurate, which they currently are not.

Not to powerlevel here, but all of my babies tests came back with a high risk for downs and all of them were born normal. Something in my pregnancy sets off the retard alarm big time and I was offered an abortion every time, it fills me with horror that I could have aborted my perfectly healthy kids on the back of this test.

I doubt I'm alone in this, especially as there's been a recent scandal of parents being told to abort their own healthy young or finding out post mortem that they did because the tests aren't all as accurate as previously thought.

Until the methods improve I'm firmly on the no side.
 
I saw a guy working at a Panda Express who looked exactly like a downie—had the mongoloid face and everything—but he spoke perfectly and sounded like an average joe.
I don't know if he had some killer elocution classes or what but it was a surreal experience.
On-topic I'm against eugenics on principle because it deprives Kiwi Farms of its primary userbase.
 
Do you understand that "high risk" isn't "100% guarantee"?
I do and still stand by my point, the tests need to be a simple yes or no without endangering mother or child and it needs to be early on in the pregnancy because even if it is the case and the mother is given the certainty there's nothing moral about aborting a child that's formed enough to flinch away from surgical instruments.

Very few people or health services are prepared or could be adapted for such a thing and abortion before that point is abhorrent. There are a few NHS trusts in hot water for pressuring parents that were in my particular situation to abort leaving the parents mourning the premature death of healthy kids in a replacement rate crisis no less.

That said I don't want downies aborted for the sake of the publics coin purse either, it's hard to respect a people that value money over human life.
 
"Should I submit my research grant proposal to find a way to successfully gestate aborted babies so they can still grow up? Naw, that'll never get approved by the jury. I'll submit a proposal to transplant uteruses into trannies instead."

💡 We'll use the trannies and their new uteruses as the incubators! That way, I still get to save babies with this research and the degenerates who gatekeep medical research grants still get to do depraved psycho shit PLUS raise the next generation in coomer dungeons! 💡
It'd be great if what got researched in medicine was what helped the most people instead of what scientists are told what will make their company the most money.
 
Even if one thinks Eugenics is wrong, surely one can agree that a person with a serious mental or even physical disability should be spared unneeded suffering.
...If we're going by the Kiwifarms answer, prepare a thread on them in retrospect for when they turn 18.
 
Even if one thinks Eugenics is wrong, surely one can agree that a person with a serious mental or even physical disability should be spared unneeded suffering.
...If we're going by the Kiwifarms answer, prepare a thread on them in retrospect for when they turn 18.
But here’s the thing: they’re not suffering.
 
Maybe not from their perspective, but they still are extremely limited by what they can do and accomplish in life, it's really kind of sad.
What perspective matters besides theirs?

This is what I mean: people look at someone else, project what they think they would want in that situation, and then try to force it over whether or not that person would have wanted it.

My biggest concern with their wellbeing is what happens to them when their parents croak, a lot of these people don’t really have anybody else.
 
Abortion is awesome and eugenics is based.
Based and correct. All these little spuds making their way into the world just makes shit more burdensome for actual full humans. And for those of you who might be concerned aborting the downies will dry up some of our milk (a precious commodity, no doubt), fear not. Sadly, we still cannot detect autism in utero.
 
Back