US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can I make a small request, can we have a poll to see about tagging HHH a thread ban for small period? It derails the entire thread for page after page after page when these jackwagons can't stop taking bait. If HHH wants to post in here that's fine, but these people tagging him know exactly what they are doing.
Booohooo daddy and mommy please help I can't scroll past the mean posts.

Fuck you.
 
I can't with these OLDIES lmaooo
View attachment 7111318

Look at the website they have on their banners AHAHAHA
View attachment 7111344

Donald Loves Vladimir dot com! What, are you calling them gay? VERY problematic, Ms. Boomer! It's time for you to step aside and let LGBTIQQPP+ people take over your decayed, barren, and rotten world!

Putler is clearly not a part of the LGBTIQQPP+ because he likes bare naked hooters.
View attachment 7111386
Sorry, I was just thinking of this picture today.
What was this supposed to accomplish?
 
they got rid of the injun codetalkers too which is a shame since they were important in the pacific theatre. cue the contrarians who will say we could've won without them.
I say turnabout is fair play. For every white person played by a minority we erase non white history. Now no one is happy
 
A rough idea of how President Trump could go about this situation if he wanted to play dirty:

1.) Impeach the rogue judges. Putting them through the process is the point, not conviction.

2.) Effectively abolish said judges’ district courts by an act of Congress made in the background of the impeachment process. This could be done one of two ways:

a) By budget reconciliation to defund the specified district courts.*
Or
b) By outright abolishing the district courts in question through killing the filibuster.*

*
Either of which are dependent on the Republicans in the Senate and House being in lockstep, which is obviously not the case at the moment.

3.) Arrest judges who try to impose injunctions on said Act of Congress.

4.) Invoke the Insurrection Act to clean up the aftermath, or help complete Step 3.

I’m no lawyer, so please highlight any legal/logical errors, aside from the obvious constitution crises this would raise (on top of the current situation).

Do I think this will be the case?

I would hope not, given the Left’s propensity to violence, but time will tell.

Though, another thing to consider is that the pressure the Judicial Branch could face from steps 1 and 2 might be enough to rein them in.
There is actually another way:

1742414618628.png

Use Judiciary own rules against them and go for a simple majority. Now it would require a few Republican to not cuck but way lower bar then 2/3.
 
Use Judiciary own rules against them and go for a simple majority. Now it would require a few Republican to not cuck but way lower bar then 2/3.

Article III​

Section 1

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

Section 2

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;—between a State and Citizens of another State,—between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.

Section 3

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
So I see the good Behavior clause, but I don't see where a simple majority of both halves of Congress can remove said judge for Behavior that is not good.
 
Breaking:: A traffic court judge in the Bronx has ruled that Donald Trump's decision not to resign is unconstitutional and has ordered him to resign. Will Donald Trump follow the law or cause a constitutional crisis by refusing to leave office as the court has ordered?
In a perfect world He would just dissolve these judges just say “you want a dictator, I’ll give you a dictator! have fun pushing around a shopping cart for the next couple of years!“ too bad he’s a cuck when it comes to dealing with a lawyer with a room temperature IQ.
 
There is actually another way:

View attachment 7111619

Use Judiciary own rules against them and go for a simple majority. Now it would require a few Republican to not cuck but way lower bar then 2/3.
That's not at all what the clause is saying or what it's for. It's to establish that judges may hold their position for life. What would the point of impeachment be if a simple majority without the complexities of impeachment could be done? The clause doesn't grant Congress any additional power nor does it provide a mechanism for removing a judge who may be outside 'good Behavior'. There is solely impeachment or dissolving/reorganizing the district via act of Congress (which does not technically require 2/3s majority).
 
In a perfect world He would just dissolve these judges just say “you want a dictator, I’ll give you a dictator! have fun pushing around a shopping cart for the next couple of years!“ too bad he’s a cuck when it comes to dealing with a lawyer with a room temperature IQ.
If the Democrats were smart, they would allow one judge to be impeached as a warning. What did McConnell say all those years ago about Bobama judges? "You are going to regret this, and you are going to regret this sooner than you think" is what I remember.

Edit: ah, yes, at 1:33.
 
Last edited:
Theory: Harry is gay (I believe he is), and he wishes he wasn’t. Moreover, he’s such a flamer that he knows he can’t really convince people otherwise- least of all now, after he put himself out there the way he did during the Biden administration/2024 election.

So maybe this is self-hating gay Harry’s way of trying to create plausible deniability and get people to think he’s straight- having him publicly seen (in writing, no less) as hitting on girls. It has to be intentional, because who the fuck puts their full name as their Snapchat handle? Especially if you have a public-facing, scrutinized position? Only reason that comes to mind there is he’s actually hitting on them and wants them to google his name out of some need to flex his esteemed position as a political influencer, which he’s SO proud of.
I actually agree this is some kind of gay psy-op to both create an image of "See, there's real men getting pussy on our side too," and, of course, to make it look like he's actually straight. The biggest things here is as far as I know, he wasn't actually banging most or any of these chicks, it was just online stuff. Dems and Fed boys are always gay, Harry, Nick "The Mexican Twink" Fuentes, Elijah Schaffer, etc.
 
Seeing as the post was deleted, are we talking about the recent drone light show video? If so, I did think that some parts of it were bordering on parody or even subtly mocking the "MAGA chuds" with how over-the-top it was...
it was a (very nicely done) fake EO about a new Smiling Friends season
 
The left has been using the courts for decades now to get what they want, instead of convincing voters and using Congress. The courts SHOULD have told them to fuck off and settle political questions politically. Unfortunately judges were more then happy to usurp executive and legislative power.

It was only a matter of time before a President came along with enough political capital to tell the courts to go fuck themselves. That what has really got the left upset. Not a break with norms. Not defying the rule of law, but rather their preferred method of imposing top down control over the country is being foreclosed.
They're mad that Trump and MAGA are using the left's weapons and tactics against the left. This isn't about the rule of law. Its about Trump overturning the apple cart and not honoring the gentleman's agreement the left and right made long ago. That the left could do whatever they want while the right plays the eternal cuck. Or in wrestling terms, the left plays the face while the right is the heel.
 
Last edited:
I honestly do not understand how can anyone take J.D. Vance seriously on anything regarding the demographics and immigrants when he himself has literally desecrated and effectiely ended his own bloodline by fucking a filthy jeethole and bringing into this world three more disgusting mutts with retarded names and shitskin appearance that have absolutely nothing european in them.
View attachment 7107576
View attachment 7107578
"OMG THIS IS SO WHOLESOME OUR VICE PRESIDENT IS THE SHINING EXAMPLE OF PRESERVING A NUCLEAR FAMILY!!1" - say American cuckservative "patriots" amongst the global European demographic crisis and in a <60% White country, with that percentage declining in a geometric progression.
I wonder what the Vance's parents had to say about this, I cannot even begin to comprehend the sheer scale of their despair and disappointment once they saw who their son was getting married with, let alone when they saw la creaturas he calls his children. Honestly a picture of Vance eating Indian street(-shitting) diarrhea would be less nauseating than this. Absolutely repulsive and horrifying sight.

This is just more evidence that he's a dissident right, white nationalist. They are all either gay or have brown wives.

Let's just be thankful he's not a queer.
 
Back