Was January 6th political terrorism in your eyes
As a demographic I would say that jannies are ranked somewhere between niggers and malaria-carrying mosquitoes. Reddit in particular has a breed of uberjannies that may be the least suited people on this entire planet to handle even that trifling power. They're so sick with desire to dominate others' thoughts and speech that they will janny dozens of different subreddits at once. It goes without saying that they do it for free.
are you really this ignorant about how poorly “firey yet mostly peaceful protests” and “why do you care they’re burning down your city? it’s covered by insurance” taking points have been received by the general public over the last five years?
imagine potentially throwing away the entirity of your youth and ruining your future to make an impotent political statement everyone will forget about in a day because you were driven insane by ghouls in the MSM.
Sure, but it wouldn't be the first time that it had happened. I'm not saying it's very likely, and we're better defended than ever, but it's not an impossibility is what I'm saying. More than that if a bunch of dangerhairs decide they have the balls (assuming they didn't troon out) to have their own Jan 6 you know they'd torch it in an instant rather than preserve it.
Yeah, I'd heard a lot of NJ (especially once you're off the turnpike) is gorgeous. I'd like to get out and see it someday, since I've never had the opportunity to get out East.
I wouldn't have ever expected in my lifetime for something that sounds as benign as the Secretary of Transportation to pull up, show his teeth, and tell the country to stop wasting his money or get used to walking.
It used to be that they could rib each other have a good time.
I think that they should have maybe tried to win the election, sucks to suck. Doesn't even matter to bring that up to them, they are the party of "Rules For Thee, Not For Me". The voterbase that can dish it (if you want to be generous) but not take it. The crybabies who can't handle scrunched eyebrows and have to invent the concept of "microaggressions" to protect their feely weelies.
Leftists cannot be funny, they can't meme, and they can't make catchy slogans for causes. They tried to emulate Trump's New Yorker insults to no avail. They have such cringe millennial energy that anything they make up is like a corporate orientation video trying to be funny. So yeah, I think it's gay as hell. Libtard and Libcuck is infinitely more funny than Magat and Chud (original usage.) AFAIK, the right reappropriated chud and gave it lore, making it way more fun.
These are the most nigger responses possible. I asked a question about whether it actually legally qualified as terrorist/domestic terrorism. One person (@Endless Torment ) provided a helpful screen cap of a document that provided an answer for that: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/us-politics-general-2.210076/post-20876950
Words cannot adequately express how utterly tired I am of this useless attention-whoring nigger. He is literally a dancing monkey with a billion dollars and a room-temperature IQ, flinging shit from his gilded cage to see who he can upset. Why anyone pays attention to his dipshittery is beyond me. He's about as "funny" as that Johnny Somali moron currently getting run up a flagpole in South Korea for deliberately offending them as much as possible.
@LORD IMPERATOR This is why we shouldn't be expected to play with the kid gloves on. Whether they are winning or losing they want to exterminate you. They would (and did) torch a city down to stick it to those evil nazis. This is how they handle losing; torching and bombing. They are not going to give you a pass for your "they're both idiots" stance. You are with them, or catching a molly through the living room window.
And it was asked in as smug a way as possible with deliberate intent to inflame.
Nah nigga it was just a question. Everywhere I looked mentioned "violence" but the image someone provided clarified that destruction of property is included in that in a 2020 government document.
That's an interesting thing then because Tesla and Elon are attached at the hip with the current US government administration. I am curious if the same thing would happen to another company that isn't as directly politically connected. Say for example Walmart or Starbucks piss people off and they start getting materially vandalized (not just spraypaint) but there's no harm to human life (say it happens when they're closed)... in essence if people damage a corporations property with the intent of changing that companies policies (but not the government) then would a terrorism charge still be applicable?
I think people that need to make up a new slur instead of using one of the many great ones we already have are a bunch of retarded niggerfaggots.
September 11th 2025 no one thought Trump would really do it. After the Supreme Court ruled that destruction of someone's property "isn't that big a deal" because "they have insurance" and "its definitely not terrorism and your not a nazi for it" Trump ordered a mandatory evacuation of New York City and then he nuked it... he really fucking nuked it.
It's not the target that matters. It's the purpose and intent of the people committing the acts of violence, destruction or vandalism. If people decide to start firebombing Walmarts nationwide because they want Trump to do X thing and for some reason they think that's the best way to achieve it, they're engaging in domestic terrorism.
Wait does that mean that guy is advocating for domestic terrorism then? Like he's an actual criminal using our nigger and tranny hatin forums to commit actual crimes!? Can we cut the terrorism out please this is a friendly Christian website.
