US Trump signs executive order to dismantle the Education Department - The complete elimination of the department would require the approval of Congress.

1742504923921.png

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump signed an executive order Thursday directing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to start dismantling the Department of Education.

"It sounds strange, doesn’t it? Department of Education. We’re going to eliminate it," Trump said while speaking in the East Room of the White House at a ceremony where he was flanked by children seated at school desks.

Congressional approval would be needed to fully abolish the department. Trump said that he hoped Democrats would vote in favor of legislation to do that.

“I hope they’re going to be voting for it," Trump said of congressional Democrats, "because ultimately it may come before them.”

Immediately after the signing, Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., the chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee said in a post on X that he will “submit legislation” to accomplish Trump’s goal of shutting down the Department of Education “as soon as possible.”

Congress established the Department of Education in 1979 during President Jimmy Carter’s administration, and any effort to abolish the department would face major obstacles from Democrats in the Republican-controlled Senate, where 60 votes are required to overcome a filibuster and advance a measure to a final vote.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday morning that the department would not be completely eliminated, saying its “critical functions” would continue, including the enforcement of civil rights laws and oversight of student loans and Pell grants.

"The Department of Education will be much smaller than it is today," Leavitt said, adding that the executive order directed McMahon "to greatly minimize the agency. So when it comes to student loans and Pell grants, those will still be run out of the Department of Education."

The executive order also will not affect department activities aimed at meeting the educational needs of students with disabilities or Title I funding, which goes to school districts with a high proportion of students from low-income families, a senior administration official told NBC News on Wednesday.

The text of the executive order was not immediately published after Trump's signing.

At her Senate confirmation hearing last month, McMahon acknowledged the need to coordinate with Congress to close the department.

"Certainly President Trump understands that we’ll be working with Congress," she said in response to a question from Cassidy. "We’d like to do this right. We’d like to make sure that we are presenting a plan that I think our senators could get on board with and our Congress could get on board with that would have a better functioning Department of Education, but certainly does require congressional action."

With Trump's executive order, however, it appears the administration to some extent is sidestepping lawmakers. McMahon said on SiriusXM’s “The David Webb Show" on Tuesday that as the they "wind down" her department, administration officials want to ensure they are providing states with best practices and the tools they will need.

In her justification for eliminating the department, McMahon added, "I think it’s important to note what the Department of Education does not do. The Department of Education doesn’t educate anyone. It doesn’t hire teachers. It doesn’t establish curriculum. It doesn’t hire school boards or superintendents. It really is to help provide funding so that the states themselves can help with their own programs. But that creativity and innovation has to come from the state level.”

McMahon and the administration have already taken steps in recent weeks to gut the department by cutting the workforce nearly in half.

NBC News recently reported that state officials and lawmakers have said they're not prepared to take on the full responsibility of education policy, and Trump's latest order will likely be met with more legal challenges.

Labor and civil rights groups issued statements Wednesday blasting the administration for the move. National Education Association President Becky Pringle said Wednesday that the administration's actions "will hurt all students by sending class sizes soaring, cutting job training programs, making higher education more expensive and out of reach for middle class families, taking away special education services for students with disabilities, and gutting student civil rights protections."

NAACP President Derrick Johnson called the order "unconstitutional," adding that "the rule of law doesn’t seem to matter" to Trump.

"Only Congress can establish or abolish an executive agency," Johnson said. "Trump is not just seeking to shut down an agency, he is deliberately dismantling the basic functions of our democracy, one piece at a time. This is a dark day for the millions of American children who depend on federal funding for a quality education, including those in poor and rural communities with parents who voted for Trump."

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/wh...e-education-department-white-house-rcna197251 (Archive)
 
So if the DoE holds all these student loans, will its abolition mean that all those debts they're owed disappear, or do they still have to be repaid, or is that a matter of the legislation? Because if they just disappear or the law is written to forgive them, the Democrats wouldn't be able to block it without looking like completely hypocritical rat-bastards for stopping something that would settle that "Student debt" drum they've been banging endlessly for the past 20 years...

We don't need no education.
Our educational system was without peer before the DoE's establishment. All the world-changing technologies you benefit from come from men who graduated from college before the DoE's founding. They've done nothing but drag our educational standards down from the unquestioned #1 to global average. Fuck the DoE.
 
oversight of student loans and Pell grants.
If they want to really dismantle woke bullshit they'd slash this shit too. Colleges couldn't support their Lesbian Basket Weaving degree programs without free money from the government. Or change it so that you can only get grants and loans for degrees that will actually help the country, like real STEM degrees.
 
I was instinctively against this at first then I remembered the US education system is fucking terrible and these scumbags have t done shit to improve it.

I just worry no one is going to start fixing the damage once it's gone because the states sure as shit aren't going to do anything.
 
This one's not going to go through and will absolutely get stopped by the courts on the basis that it's a department established by Congress, which is correct. Democrats are also not going to vote for it to be dismantled. Honestly Trump should have just stuck to keeping the DoE exclusively focused on loans and grants and nothing else which is at least amenable to people who were hoping for the department to do as little as possible because fully shuttering it just is not going to happen.
 
Since the creation of the DoE education has become more expensive, less effective, almost impossible to change, and considerably more dangerous.

It is one of the biggest gibs programs that exists and a trickle of the money allocated to education reaches students.

The DoE should be burned to the ground and ruins of the building should be salted.

@MadStan Adding that I do agree he should not be allowed to completely destroy it but through more proper methodology I still think it needs to go completely and be replaced by something with extremely strict guardrails.
 
Last edited:
I had some old discord acquaintances bitching about this like it means the US will have no school or education ever, as if the administration can in no way just make a new education department from the ground up after pulling out the rot from the foundation.
So if the DoE holds all these student loans, will its abolition mean that all those debts they're owed disappear, or do they still have to be repaid
I imagine at some point those loans are managed and issued through a bank (either the fed gets the money from the bank to then loan out, or the other way around), and that somebody somewhere is still on the hook to get it from the student. I don't think they'd just let it go.
 
Back