US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You do realize there's a difference between the two things you're talking about right? Getting walmart to change a policy within their own stores isn't terrorism it's vandalism. Terrorism by the very own definition that YOU POSTED specifically states under the pursuit of idealogical aim. Terrorism is ideological by nature in law, you can't just call any dumbass burning down a store because he got fired terrorism, it has to be ideological in nature for it to be legally considered terrorism. These people are destroying cars and burning down dealerships to further a political aim of theirs.
Terrorism is to further an ideological goal
lol @ this nigga, they can't even read
 
Anyone else get whiplash when looking at pre 2004 election maps? Seeing red Colorado and blue West Virginia in the same map makes me the 90s feel like an alternate universe.
West Virginia was functionally the personal domain of DNC senator grand wizard Robert Byrd up until his retirement. As he kept the "bacon" heavily flowing to West Virginia to essentially buy out the state and votes during his tenure.
 
Last edited:
lol @ this nigga, they can't even read
You literally posted the definition of terrorism in accordance with u.s law that directly states and I quote
(B)appear to be intended—
(i)
to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii)
to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii)
to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
Notice how all of these definitions have a political or ideological nature to begin with, yet you're trying to say some dumbfuck who lets just say as an example burns down a starbucks because he doesn't want the baristas to wear aprons is within this definition.
You sir are the one who can't read.
Terrorism has a rather strict definition within the u.s that broadly dictates what it is and isn't.
 
ELF targeted private logging businesses with arson to preserve forests, it would be hard pressed to not call them terrorists for what they did.
For what it's worth the FBI considers tree-spiking to be "eco-terrorim" whatever that is.

 
Depends on the action to push for the change. ELF targeted private logging businesses with arson to preserve forests, it would be hard pressed to not call them terrorists for what they did.
That's ideological in nature, that's the point. If they say burned down said logging businesses because they didn't use their favorite brand of saws then it wouldn't be ideological it would fall under petty acts of vandalism. Terrorism is rooted in ideology
 
You literally posted the definition of terrorism in accordance with u.s law that directly states and I quote
(B)appear to be intended—
(i)
to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii)
to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii)
to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
Notice how all of these definitions have a political or ideological nature to begin with, yet you're trying to say some dumbfuck who lets just say as an example burns down a starbucks because he doesn't want the baristas to wear aprons is within this definition.
You sir are the one who can't read.
Terrorism has a rather strict definition within the u.s that broadly dictates what it is and isn't.
You didn't reply to that message. Go to school instead of sperging about politics and u might have some chance of learning to read.
 
For what it's worth the FBI considers tree-spiking to be "eco-terrorim" whatever that is.

It's putting metal in a tree in a way that someone using a chainsaw would have the saw recoil and strike their neck and kill them. Modern chainsaws have safeties that help but still
 
Motherfuckers just like this guy praised mob violence when a fentanyl addict died and they needed to get the Orange Man out of office. Now they're realizing the same mob is still thirsty for violence and there's no positive way to spin it.

It's your guys' monster. Either you kill it or the president whom you tried to destroy does. And he's not going to stop with the monster, he'll get the people who made it.
 
For what it's worth the FBI considers tree-spiking to be "eco-terrorim" whatever that is.

Terrorism by ecological activists. With the Tesla arsonists being cheered on by the left, it's just a hop skip and a jump before these idiots start firebombing gas stations to try and stop people from using cars without their permission.

Or if you're asking what tree-spiking is, it's sabotaging trees by shoving huge chunks of metal inside them. When a lumberjack shows up to chop the tree down, BEST CASE SCENARIO the saw is damaged slightly and the operation is stopped. Yay, Eco-terrorists win! More common scenario is the sawblade spinning at fuck me RPMs hits the piece of steel or iron in the tree and explodes in a cloud of shrapnel that kills loggers, or a chainsaw hits it and kicks back (or launches the fucking spike backwards at the logger) and they're injured or killed. Yay, Eco-terrorists win, suck it chuds!

It's the kind of thing that makes little faggot leftists go missing in the woods afterwards.
 
Last edited:
yet you're trying to say some dumbfuck who lets just say as an example burns down a starbucks because he doesn't want the baristas to wear aprons is within this definition.
Well, what about the aprons got him fired up? Maybe he is anti sweatshop and Starbucks aprions were made with unethical means and he wants to pressure companies to ethically source their uniforms by burning down properties.

You can target private businesses to scare them into adopting policies for political reasons and it is often a more effective strategy than targeting the goverment itself and trying to force them to pass legislation.

If they say burned down said logging businesses because they didn't use their favorite brand of saws then it wouldn't be ideological it would fall under petty acts of vandalism.
I'm pretty sure it would fall under arson my dude.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AnaV
So Ive seen quite a bit of whining about interest rates in the USA on here and other places
1742518692792.png
1742518740428.png
source

Yes I know its not great or whatever but I wanted tot make a quick moment to give everyone a tiny bit of perspective what that real world comparison to the "shitholes" we joke about so often

Id like to introduce you all to Nigeria, the most populous country in all of Africa and only 100 million less people than us.
1742518890934.png

What pray tell is there national interest rate? get an absurd number in your head, this is a country with over 200 MILLION people, what does the government charge on their OWN loans?
1742518999060.png

But thats not even close to the best part, the reason I fell down this rabbit hole in the first place is I found this absurdly sketchy mobile loan app called PalmCredit (thats a link to their google playstore page, Id be careful going to the actual website, likely scrapes info like you wouldent believe)

Im sure plenty of you are asking why ANY of this matters, stick with me, im going to make it all make sense

So if the state is charging nearly 30% APR what is a shady mobile "micro-loan" app offer? When I tell you its bad enough to make an orthodox Jew blush Im not kidding

1742519369558.png
50% APR, once again still not the best (or most egregious part) Check out what is tucked away in the "extra info"
1742519478609.png
1.2% DAILY COMPOUND INTEREST, for those of you unaware compound intrest is one of THE most powerful forces in the know universe. $100 at 1.2% daily compound interest yields over $6,000 in 1 year.

Keep in mind this is all for a currency where half a million of their shitbux(Naira) translate to about 300 USD

Computer how much US aid does Nigeria receive yearly?
1742519697127.png

I just take this very long walk to explain why our cutting of foreign aid isent some travesty, its stoping these countries being able to take advantage of their own people for pennies

Honestly have to share just one more video I found in all this

PalmCredit DOES NOT play games with people who dont pay up, watch this little nog get litteraly picked up and put in the back of a van by BRANDED employees over what is likely less than 100 USD difference

 
For what it's worth the FBI considers tree-spiking to be "eco-terrorim" whatever that is.

I lived the in the area at the time and have a friend who damn near got killed by a tree spike.

Like most Leftist and Democratic ops, it entirely keeps them out of harms way and keeps them from getting caught due to the fact that they are long gone when the damage happens.

What used to happen is that they go to where the loggers are working, usually at night, and look for marked trees or, if the area was being clearcut, just random trees.

Then they drove a long metal spike into the tree at an angle from chest high to knee high. Pro-ones would then glue bark back on once it was hammered in. Other ones would do random small spikes or a ring of small spikes.

What happens is the chainsaw hits that metal spike and has a HIGH chance of breaking the chain. That 80% of the time sent the broken chain whipsawing back to rip open the neck/chest/face of the guy running the saw. Tearing straight through his protective gear.

It started killing people. The Left, particularly the eco-faggots of the West Coast, started celebrating. As in, places like Evergreen College actually celebrated the deaths of these people in the same way they would later celebrate entire towns being destroyed by eco-lawfare. Evergreen actually had a board where they'd put the news article and pictures if they could get them.

That's when cameras went up and were hidden.

Most leftists don't think anyone who isn't a liberal understands or uses technology, so they were shocked that the cameras recorded them doing the deed.

They KNEW it would kill the loggers.

They did it to sow terror, to say "if you don't stop like we want you to, we will kill you at random..."

They laughed and giggled about it.

Once that got terrorist activity slapped on it, that's when CA legislators and NGOs got involved and made logging nearly illegal on the West Coast so that the Sierra Club could buy up the land, clear cut it, strip mine the land, then let it turn into bushland that catches on fire every year.
 
Terrorism by ecological activists. With the Tesla arsonists being cheered on by the left, it's just a hop skip and a jump before these idiots start firebombing gas stations to try and stop people from using cars without their permission.
I'm just waiting for us to get our first instance of a Tesla being attacked with an armed driver in it, and the ensuing terrorist death. It only takes one retard to decide to start attacking occupied vehicles because empty ones 'aren't getting the message across', and its going to turn into another Rittenhouse level case.

I hope I'm wrong, obviously, but without the USAID orgs to seemingly organize the rabble, the rabbles self escalating, online rhetoric is no longer being filtered out from real life action.
 
Back