They'd be charged for both, you're arguing semantics at this point
Ha I know what tree-spiking is I meant whatever "eco-terrorism" is since other sources say terrorism laws don't apply to "eco-terrorism." Just more word games.
It'll be the court case that decides it.
Yes, we saw this with all kinds of shit with the culture war. The rabble doesn't understand WHY tactics work, they just know if they do X then they win, so X is an I Win Button for the culture war, right? Well, not always. It's a particularly annoying problem for the left especially since they have increasingly become reliant on Shaniquas to do their grunt work.
Fixed that for you.
Eco terrorism has always been treated with a light hand, for reasons that are in retrospect obvious, with all the funding thats been going on. Shit like spiking is presented as not being about forcing legal change via hurting people, but by making doing the thing they want outlawed so dangerous as to make the law moot. They're not hurting people, they're just protecting nature, and we wouldn't have to do this if the government would just outlaw the thing in the first place.
It's not semantics, they are two very different things. It's like murdering a guy and saying it is a misdemeanor assault. You're the one getting anal about definitions in the first place.
Leftist can't understand that fascism at it's core is MORE government WHAT THEY fight for. While they bitch about the Trump presidency that REDUCE the government power.
You can be charged with multiple things and convicted of both, neither, or 1 of them. It's why prosecutors more often than not over charge, to get someone on one thing. Again it is very semantical when this wasn't even the original point.
To me, it appears that firebombing Teslas is a proxy to indirectly attack/threaten Elon Musk. So, yes I would consider this terrorism as a political statement. I thought the Tesla makeshift bomb at a Trump hotel was a one-off by a psycho.
I'm mostly super dubious about foreign aid because I'm certain most of it ends up being stolen by corruption or inefficiency or nepotism and shit like that. If these shithold countries didn't have corruption in the first place then they wouldn't need foreign aid to begin with.
If anything the Tesla firebombing on the first day of the presidency was probably an inspiration to a ton of people. It looked straight out of a fucking movie, much like the aesthetic of the Luigi shooting and it no doubt scared the shit out of Elon Musk.
If you commit arson you are not getting charged with "petty acts of vandalism" as they are not even in the same league, maybe "destruction of property" but definitely not petty vandalism. It does relate to the original point because I don't think someone who doesn't know the difference between those two should be lecturing us on what counts as terrorism or not.
It doesn't matter. You don't vote your way out of the mess ireland and all of Europe are in.
He is more likely to get arrested on the campaign trail than get into office with the current state of Europe.
Going by this standard no Irishman can hold office in Ireland.
Can we just get back to the original point, the word petty was used to describe the motivation not the crime. I'm sorry that you don't understand that vandalism is also a felony if more than $400 of damage is dealt. Seriously is it this hard to not grab onto one singular word to try and dismiss an entire argument when that wasn't even the original point. Like jesus christ fine he'd be charged with arson and felony vandalism. It doesn't matter what terminology is used my point is still correct retard.
Honestly it probably increases his viability for office.
That explains why they're being run by forigners in Brussels.
I think it was @neger psykolog that compared JFK's relationship with the CIA to a "Byzantine fault." From my understanding of it, say there's a tower and multiple generals are tasked to attack it for success. Some generals DON'T attack because the order was lost in translation, sabotage or MIA. With that logic, the CIA either miscommunicated an order to kill the president or somebody went rogue and intentionally muddied the line of communication. Wrong place, wrong time especially with the Red Scare of the 60s.
They want fascism when it benefits them. The more power on their side, the better. Everything else is irrelevant.
