US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trump retracted one of the executive orders stripping clearances and contracts from a Democrat law firm:
View attachment 7116335
Source (Archive)

Tweet about the injunctions:
View attachment 7116340
Source (Archive)

Tweet about a corrupt judge:
View attachment 7116345
Source (Archive)
Since randomly my shitposts on this forum keep getting granted. Whoever reads my posts in Trump admin. Please get scotus to confirm pardons are something that cannot be undone. Then thank them as they have given the president the power of unilateral assassination as he can just pardon himself or anyone else before murdering them. "Muh impeachment!" Which moves faster, impeachment proceedings or drone strikes on congress?
 
For what it's worth the FBI considers tree-spiking to be "eco-terrorim" whatever that is.
Something that has killed and maimed many loggers, is what it is. When a chainsaw hits one, it can and does kill or maim the operator, unless he is lucky or quick.. Fuck tree-spikers. It is an act of sabotage used as violence for political means. Terrorism.
 
I think it was @neger psykolog that compared JFK's relationship with the CIA to a "Byzantine fault." From my understanding of it, say there's a tower and multiple generals are tasked to attack it for success. Some generals DON'T attack because the order was lost in translation, sabotage or MIA. With that logic, the CIA either miscommunicated an order to kill the president or somebody went rogue and intentionally muddied the line of communication. Wrong place, wrong time especially with the Red Scare of the 60s.
Yeah but I wasn't just referring to JFK's relationship with the CIA. The CIA itself is for lack of a better term autonomous from the US government and does random shit all the time with or without the president's knowledge.
My theory is that they had so many operations going on, trying to catch commies, trying to infiltrate cuba, trying to recruit double-agents, trying to do this and that all at the same time that they had fog of war and didn't know actually know what all of their components were actually doing or where they were and in that situation the CIA probably inadvertently funded or trained someone (or a group) who ended up shooting JFK.

That may sound far fetched until you remember that the CIA financed and trained Osama Bin Laden early on in his life.
 
I'm just waiting for us to get our first instance of a Tesla being attacked with an armed driver in it, and the ensuing terrorist death. It only takes one retard to decide to start attacking occupied vehicles because empty ones 'aren't getting the message across', and its going to turn into another Rittenhouse level case.

I hope I'm wrong, obviously, but without the USAID orgs to seemingly organize the rabble, the rabbles self escalating, online rhetoric is no longer being filtered out from real life action.
They just need to guillotine them by popping open the Cybertruck's trunk open and snapping it shut.
 
My theory is that they had so many operations going on, trying to catch commies, trying to infiltrate cuba, trying to recruit double-agents, trying to do this and that all at the same time that they had fog of war and didn't know actually know what all of their components were actually doing or where they were and in that situation the CIA probably inadvertently funded or trained someone (or a group) who ended up shooting JFK.
It wouldn't surprise me. If anything, for better or worse, the whole government is against Trump, so this would be an inverse JFK situation. Remember how the South leveled its own land to stop the North? That's their tactic NOW. By any means necessary.
 
Please get scotus to confirm pardons are something that cannot be undone. Then thank them as they have given the president the power of unilateral assassination as he can just pardon himself or anyone else before murdering them. "Muh impeachment!" Which moves faster, impeachment proceedings or drone strikes on congress?
The concept of a president pardoning themselves has no legal precedent and would be challenged at every possible level. And even if it somehow went through, if he was being charged for state offenses he would not be able to pardon himself from those. Also it sounds like you are advocating for political violence good sir, I thought MAGA didn't condone political violence
 
What are they spending it all on?
Not sure of the answer to that but Ireland has made itself a de facto tax haven for companies like Facebook and Apple for fucking decades. I remember being a kid and pulling apart my mac and seeing a "made in ireland" label and was confused as fuck.

It's stupid because they could make tons of money off of those companies, but they don't because they're Irish (I'm not sure what the actual reason is)
 
The concept of a president pardoning themselves has no legal precedent and would be challenged at every possible level. And even if it somehow went through, if he was being charged for state offenses he would not be able to pardon himself from those. Also it sounds like you are advocating for political violence good sir, I thought MAGA didn't condone political violence
There is no law limiting the ablity for the president to pardon whoever he wants for whatever he wants. If you want to argue there is then all previous pardons are fair play to be fucked with. Congress is within DC not a state, so drone striking congress is not a state offence.
 
Can we just get back to the original point, the word petty was used to describe the motivation not the crime. I'm sorry that you don't understand that vandalism is also a felony if more than $400 of damage is dealt. Seriously is it this hard to not grab onto one singular word to try and dismiss an entire argument when that wasn't even the original point. Like jesus christ fine he'd be charged with arson and felony vandalism. It doesn't matter what terminology is used my point is still correct retard.
It wasn't one word. You explicitly stated Petty acts of Vandalism which is for shit like keying cars or graffiti.
that's the point. If they say burned down said logging businesses because they didn't use their favorite brand of saws then it wouldn't be ideological it would fall under petty acts of vandalism.
Anyway, one reason why I latched onto it is because it's how my very liberal PoliSci teacher used that kind of language to downplay arsons and terrorism that ELF, ANTIFA, and BLM commit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
The concept of a president pardoning themselves has no legal precedent and would be challenged at every possible level. And even if it somehow went through, if he was being charged for state offenses he would not be able to pardon himself from those. Also it sounds like you are advocating for political violence good sir, I thought MAGA didn't condone political violence
There is no law limiting the ablity for the president to pardon whoever he wants for whatever he wants. If you want to argue there is then all previous pardons are fair play to be fucked with.
There was a legal opinion or some shit written about Nixon that said he could have just resigned (which makes the VP immediately become the president) and then the VP could've written a pardon for him and no one could say shit.

Lifehack: just resign and make your VP pardon you.
 
There was a legal opinion or some shit written about Nixon that said he could have just resigned (which makes the VP immediately become the president) and then the VP could've written a pardon for him and no one could say shit.

Lifehack: just resign and make your VP pardon you.
That is under the absolute retard historylet viewpoint that views watergate as anything other than an obvious framejob done by the CIA in conjuction with the media. Sure is funny how Agnew was taken down only to be replaced by Ford who LBJ stated was a "controllable asset".
 
That is under the absolute retard historylet viewpoint that views watergate as anything other than an obvious framejob done by the CIA in conjuction with the media. Sure is funny how Agnew was taken down only to be replaced by Ford who LBJ stated was a "controllable asset".
Agnew was thoroughly corrupt and had been long before being VP. The FBI had him dead to rights.
 
Back