US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The case against him was a civil one and not a criminal one. Someone who knows Irish law could better give a rundown as to why this is because from what I know of burger cases, this is highly suspect. So eh. Still not at all relevant to what Jace was talking about.
The burden of proof is higher in criminal cases than it is in civil ones. The Department of Public Prosecution didn't think they would have been able to secure a conviction against McGregor, so they wouldn't take it to court. Nikita Hand, his accuser took him to civil court and won. It's honestly very hard to know who is telling the truth as both of their stories have holes. Most people view the fact that she was covered in bruises and had to have her tampon removed via forceps as proof that he's guilty. And it does look bad, obviously. But she was on a two day booze and coke bender, as was he, and I don't think it's outside the realm of reason that she forgot about the tampon, neither of them noticed it and that even with consensual sex, a tampon could end up needing to be removed.

And there is also the case that the other woman in the hotel suite with them gave a statement that she thought that Hand was fine after she came out of McGregor's room and she happily hugged her goodbye before McGregor and the other woman left. Then Hand stayed behind and either had sex with McGregor's friend or was raped by the friend. (The man who had been having sex with the other woman while McGregor and Hand were in McGregor's room.) There was no way to secure a conviction and I'm not convinced, from what I do know, that she should have won the civil case either. Which doesn't mean I'm convinced of his innocence. I very much suspect they went to his room with both of them intending to have sex and at some point she regretted that decision, as afaik, she was in a relationship with the father of her young child, at the time. Whether she regretted that decision before anything happened and he wouldn't let her leave or she regretted it after consensual sex and reframed it as rape after the fact, I don't know. His history of violence and her bruises suggest the latter. Though, supposedly there is cctv footage of her hugging him after the sex/rape which could suggest the former.
 
The accusation that I 'fell for a narrative'.
I never mentioned leftism retard.
Cause it pretty much is a narrative. The guy who made the claim is Steve Hassan who’s considered the “leading expert on cults” simply because he was in the Moonies back in the 70s and he is known for using “deprogramming” as a way to brainwash people which he got from his time with the moonies.
Yes it's a non-sequitur to state a baseless assertion and act as if it rebukes a conclusion derived from what is readily observable.
Claiming that nothing is being addressed is in itself a baseless assertion that you got from watching the media.

Who is the 'their' in this sentence?

Another non-sequitur. I clearly meant your bullshit assertion about my points being 'addressed behind the scenes'. That in some 'mysterious and hidden way' Trump's totally taking care of these points, bro:
You know who they are, the democrat judges, the media, the usual suspects who don’t want him to implement anything.

Again, I'll wait a few months then come back here and bring up the very same list I made in the post you're feebly attempting to address in a cogent manner. I wonder what inane and irrational tripe you'll have to trot out then, drone?
So what happens if in a few months he decides to address at least some of your points? Are you just going to be silent about it?
 
Elon being autistic in his support of H1B is what soured me on him and I wish trump would tell him to hit the road. Elon literally wants to flood engineering with the mess Indians because they work for cheap and kiss his ass. Can’t support him after that.
The thing with Elon is that he owns the social media platform that got Trump elected so Trump knows he has to play nice. Vivek on the other hand did the exact same shit and his ass got kicked to the designated shitting street for it.

I still would never want to work for Musk and I sure as shit wouldn't want to see him hold any public office. He's not the kind of guy you want having power over you.
 
Please God let this happen. I want 8000 year old, completely zombified Biden vs Vance in 28.

View attachment 7118842
I never thought I'd say this, but I almost feel bad for Joe.

Keyword: Almost. He deserves this for being a terrible father and a child molester. Now his punishment is being drug around on stage by his family members who want to milk his senile ass for money because they can't do it on their own. This legitimately has to be hell on earth for him.
 
Can you dm me what you find cause I never heard about that.

probably not because I know this from living through the era and being personally acquainted with a bunch of the players. there was extensive journalism about it in the 90s and there are good bibliographies indexing this journalism in the buttloads of phd theses that have been written on the subject but finding this shit requires university affiliation and/or insane autism

it's this scholarship done on earth first and associated groups that is presented to policy groups and government committees and it's extremely pro-terrorist. the groups are basically treated like the UN currently treats Hamas.

this is probably where the idea that ecoterrorists are "treated with kid gloves" comes from, because right now, the *image* of the ecoterrorists of the 90s is heavily laundered and if you google for stuff like earth first and ELF you will find faggot opinion pieces about how they were good boyz who loved the erf and dindu nuffin. But on the ground at the time the FBI was taking this shit very cereal and running active couterterrorism gayops. (the ops were frequently actually gay in that actual gay relationships were established between agents and terrorists)

I recommend reading Pynchon's novel Vineland for a sense of the vibe of the time.
 
The DNC is in shambles. It's amazing to me that tens of millions of people are going to vote blue, no matter who. The DNC doesn't need plan or a platform. I guess the plan to import voters really does work.
 
The thing with Elon is that he owns the social media platform that got Trump elected so Trump knows he has to play nice. Vivek on the other hand did the exact same shit and his ass got kicked to the designated shitting street for it.

I still would never want to work for Musk and I sure as shit wouldn't want to see him hold any public office. He's not the kind of guy you want having power over you.
I try to tell this to other people that like trump but they just brush it off because musk helps trump so he must be the good guy right? And I’m actually wondering if these people realize what having a boss like Elon is like. It’s like everyone says “He is making the government more efficient” which tbf I support, but do you really want a boss who prioritizes his own view of efficiency over everything else? Thats also the real kicker, Elon could consider 24/7 ass kissing to be absolutely necessary for an efficient industry while paying Americans good salaries could decrease efficiency when there are Indians willing to work for less
 
Judge Boasberg has set a hearing for 14:30 today (Friday) as he felt the responses to his questions by the DoJ were "insufficient". He is demanding a "cabinet level member with full knowledge of the facts" report to the hearing to answer his questions.

He has said he will use the "FULL array of legal powers vested in his position to enforce adherence. Upto and not limited to filing contempt charges against Trump if his requests are not fullfilled"

Do it faggot, try to charge Trump with contempt for not obeying your ridiculous request. good luck finding a bailiff or sheriff to enforce those warrants. I think were about to have a Andrew Jackson moment here as this Democrat judge fully believes he has the power to put Trump in prison for not obeying his orders.

Fun times ahead!
What happened to arresting Trump via the ‘War Act’?
 
Back