I remember that. IIRC She was downright giddy about it, laughing at him, tugging on him when he tried to leave (repeatedly) so he has to engage with her when he clearly doesn't want to.
"Why you filmin'?" "For everyone's safety" [Slaps cameraman's camera]
Same level of sadism as kids who do mean shit to animals, amplified by nigger. Thank God body cams and phones are everywhere now, niggers keep showing who they really are for everyone to see now.
Department of Government Efficiency is supposed to audit the Social Security Administration.
This is causing a LOT of panic. I mean, a lot of panic. (Can't imagine why.)
Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander issued an order barring Social Security Administration officials from allowing DOGE access personally identifiable information in a case brought by the AFL-CIO labor union.
(Mustn't let the government's efficiency team get ahold of information that would make it easy for them to catch people committing fraud, that'd just be too terrible.)
So Lee Dudek, acting SSA commissioner, suggests following the order exactly and terminate access by all SSA employees, including the ones that are in charge of important stuff like Social Security payments.
Personally I say let DOGE have the information. Our SS numbers are all over the place anyway. Who is harmed by a few more people seeing? Oh yeah, the ones using those numbers fraudulently. Those guys should probably be covering their tracks right now.
I'm not sure. The only people who will really suffer are people who would've voted Democrat even if their lives dramatically improved under Trump. Everyone else would experience quality of life improvments and better job access as Trump stimulates the economy. Plus the Democrats are basically condoning rampant terrorism and are hostile to anyone that doesn't toe the party line. Most of their remaining supporters will be concentrated in bughives and neutered by the electoral college.
If the housing bubble pops and the stock market is 50% lower a year from now millions of Trump-supporting boomers will flip in a heartbeat if they're told the Dems will pump it back up. That was their retirement plan, fuck saving and living within your means. I hate it but them's the facts. This has always been my biggest fear with the Trump Reset. Congress needs to move lightning fast before the midterms enacting the EO's into law and there's been no indication of that happening.
why arrest when trump could just bomb him dead?...I mean I guess theres issues of bribery and not killing him like what might of happened of Epstein, but seriously soros has done enough I don't have moral qualms about going straight to execution for him tbh.
Any man under the age of 45 should be far more mad at the West then most are, and want to see it's destruction and it's politicians and globohomo execs *redacted*.
its quite the game for me to think "who do i know who is under 35 and doing well in life" and realize how few people i can name. best case they own a house, none are married or have kids. i know a guy with a masters who never lived on his own because his uncle had a place next to the college he went to, meaning he never really got to experience that part of college. he's 34 and lives like he did at 18, he's still working the same shitty retail job. its fucking grim
the thing that pisses me off is seeing all the legit charismatic or intelligent guys i knew who are basically Luigi-esque and haven't gotten laid in years, can't find a girlfriend, have peaked in career advancement because of their race and will be stuck like this the rest of their lives.
its one thing to be a chris-chan retard and stuck at home with no chance of finding a "boyfriend free girl" but when you have a 6 pack and make more than a senator and still having a hard time finding a girl its rough. Literally the most accomplished guy i know is 34 with a masters in engineering and just got married to some born again former druggie and whore who won't let him do anything fun and barely has sex despite also wanting kids and they now do IVF because sex the normal way is too "traumatic", and i know plenty of dudes with insane jobs but its still not enough for an apartment in the "trendy" place in the city and can't talk to women online worth a damn and no matter how nice they look or act its still not enough to talk to a girl that is a 4.
If the housing bubble pops and the stock market is 50% lower a year from now millions of Trump-supporting boomers will flip in a heartbeat if they're told the Dems will pump it back up. That was their retirement plan, fuck saving and living within your means. I hate it but them's the facts. This has always been my biggest fear with the Trump Reset. Congress needs to move lightning fast before the midterms enacting the EO's into law and there's been no indication of that happening.
Excuse the possible double post, I'm just skimming highlights... can you elaborate? I'm asthmatic, and would love to not be. If there's a way to get over it, I'd be happy to learn.
Excuse the possible double post, I'm just skimming highlights... can you elaborate? I'm asthmatic, and would love to not be. If there's a way to get over it, I'd be happy to learn.
No worries. I don't know, I don't have asthma but, Teddy Roosevelt was asthmatic growing up and he kinda just ignored it and worked out alot, and it went away. But perhaps you need to be a main character or sth, for this to be an effective method.
The answer seems to be that lib-lady is "playing a character". I'm not saying the video is fake, rather that our culture has become so performative that lib-lady wouldn't even be able to give you an honest answer on why she did this. It's just "what you do". Brain on complete autopilot, merely reacting to stimuli, but her mind seems to be able to evaluate the situation she is in and deems it as... funny.
It's because normies view things exclusively through the lens of media. You have people who are incapable of talking about current events without referencing Star Wars or Harry Potter. She views herself as the main character of the story. People are over-media-ized, for want of a better term. They don't understand reality.
It's not partisan either. One apt description of the January 6ers talked about how they raided the capital and wandered around aimlessly, like they were in a video game waiting for the next level to load, or for their next objective waypoint to spawn. I think about that a lot.
Department of Government Efficiency is supposed to audit the Social Security Administration.
This is causing a LOT of panic. I mean, a lot of panic. (Can't imagine why.)
"I don't know why you keep saying there's tons of illegal immigrants in the country, falsely registered to vote. There's no proof of that. Electron fraud is extremely rare, and whenever it does happen, it's Republicans doing it."
why arrest when trump could just bomb him dead?...I mean I guess theres issues of bribery and not killing him like what might of happened of Epstein, but seriously soros has done enough I don't have moral qualms about going straight to execution for him tbh.
I feel like that could be a diplomatic issue, especially if he's in a NATO country or something. Not like they could stop Trump, but they wouldn't take it well.
Excuse the possible double post, I'm just skimming highlights... can you elaborate? I'm asthmatic, and would love to not be. If there's a way to get over it, I'd be happy to learn.
I feel like that could be a diplomatic issue, especially if he's in a NATO country or something. Not like they could stop Trump, but they wouldn't take it well.
I feel like if you got enough of a dossier on him about what he funds, label it terrorism (IT IS) and everything else, you could adjust the optics some. Hell we bombed a bunch of people in the middle east, many who weren't necessarily even combatants but contributors, so I think the argument could be made. UN and nato might still have a tizzy, but they would then basically have to deal with the optics of defending a terrorist.
View attachment 7119615 View attachment 7119614 View attachment 7119604
I have been staring at this video trying to figure out why she is smiling as she runs after him and trying to take his hat. Like it's some kind of game or courtship ritual. I guess hat guy also sees this as a game (he seems to be rather young so let's go easy on him), but if what lib-lady says about her beliefs concerning the hat is authentic, why the smile? Shouldn't she have an angry expression?
A lot of female authoritarian types tend to smile and maintain a "nice" expression even when they're furious. Think of an angry kindergarten teacher keeping a fixed smile on her face while she tells the class how disappointed she is that they couldn't stand in line without yelling.
Things make a lot more sense once you recognize that the female left-authoritarian archetype is basically an eternal kindergarten teacher: scolding people for being uneducated, for not standing in line obediently, for not listening to authority figures who always know better than them. All while smiling and "being kind."