US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am gratified to see that his downfall is following my imagined timeline. I did not know he was a noncitizen though which makes his actions even more hilarious.
I can't wait until Hogg's degen online shit comes out. If anyone's into zoo or pedo it's that guy. Best you can say for Sisson is at least all his nonsense seemed to be with actual women that were of age.
 
you heathen referencing the remake. The original was so much better except for Barrowman
The original was amazing with Gene Wilder and Zero Mostel was a more convincing crook, but the remake had better musical numbers and both Franz Liebkind and Carmen Ghia got more screen time. Sue me.
 
What blows my mind is no one liked Cats. It was played up at the time by critics, then everyone saw it, and realized "wow, these people really like the smell of their own farts." It was mocked into oblivion throughout the 90's to the point that kid's shows like Hey Arnold! made fun of it. There was a similar phenomenon with Rent and it got mocked in Team America: World Police, among other entertainment in the late 2000's/early early 2010's.
I recall my first exposure to Cats was the psa about smoking or whatever it was
at the very least you can say of Cats, it's very sincere
you can argue if "A Broadway Show!" has any merit about existing or not, but Cats is definitely A Broadway Show beyond any shadow of the doubt
 
I recall my first exposure to Cats was the psa about smoking or whatever it was
at the very least you can say of Cats, it's very sincere
you can argue if "A Broadway Show!" has any merit about existing or not, but Cats is definitely A Broadway Show beyond any shadow of the doubt
There is such a thing in show business as being too sincere. Case in point: Hannah Gadsby.
 
If it wasn't for the little pep rallies they wouldn't be able to generate any images or quotes for the media to show while talking about "party solidarity" and "fighting back" they have to have these pity parties or else they have nothing. The dem party is dead and leaderless as it fails around trying to figure out which of the hundreds of self inflicted cuts was the one that finally did them in. They'll never ask the questions needed to reform themselves, this is what they asked for and what they deserved.
Trannies and the import of infinity foreigners. It's insane how just these two issues alone are such a huge stumbling block for them. Of course they have more going on than just that, but looking inward and asking yourself if you really want to be the party that grooms kids and propagates domestic drug dealers (and the problems they bring) should be a pretty easy question to answer. But, no, they choose over and over to go "mu-mu-muh rights, man everybody should have rights, man" as if 1) trannies have different rights than everybody else for some reason and 2) foreigners don't have rights which they apparently do for some reason.

They're just platforming on non-issues while dressing them up in the ugliest way they possibly could.
They're not a party and they never were. It's the dying gasp of the Uniparty. Why else would Schumer just flat out call Americans greedy for not wanting to pay taxes?
As if being pissed off with taxes wasn't the issue that led to a bunch of farmers and lawyers arming themselves against and overthrowing the most powerful military of their time and leading to the formation of the most powerful nation on the planet today.
 
Actual question, if inmigration causes crime, why are current studies skewed to say otherwise? Is it faulty methodology, or the statistics themselves are cooked?

Short and simple answer, yes, they cook the books. Long answer, they manipulate the data in a lot of ways and to a point that it's not useful or reflects their personal beliefs. Methods used are things like booking Hispanics/blacks as white during arrests. Not allowing race or nationality to be added to certain forms. Over or under sampling certain demographics during surveys and when it's not anything listed above then they will just flat out lie.

Take California for instance, when there was major uptick of crimes happening at their train stations (black on white/Hispanic crime almost exclusively), the camera footage didn't support their racial narrative and was making it's way online. Their response wasn't to add more cops or addresses why the crime was racially biased. Their response was to remove the cameras from the train station.
 
I can't wait until Hogg's degen online shit comes out. If anyone's into zoo or pedo it's that guy. Best you can say for Sisson is at least all his nonsense seemed to be with actual women that were of age.
I see Hogg as more of a floor freezer hooker enjoyer than a pedo. He just looks like the kind of guy who went on a date, came home with the girl, could not get it up and killed her for laughing at him but that was not enough so he had to start cruising for prostitutes to murder.
Apparently, a fatwa has been issued to MAGA shill accounts on behalf of BIG SODA to post in favor of keeping soda in food stamps—for seemingly no reason. Some pretty big accounts are involved (and also Ian Miles Cheong, too), and allegedly, they're paying up to $1,000 per shill
Archive
View attachment 7123044View attachment 7123045
I really do not understand why people receiving government food benefits are allowed to buy shit like soda or pop-tars or cereals that are 10x your daily sugar limit with those benefits. It really irks me.

Also if they were paid to post that stuff and failed to disclose that this was a paid statement it is a FTC violation. It was a violation when it was done by people on the left and it is just as much of one now. I hope the FTC fines the ever living fuck out of all parties involved.
 
Last edited:
AOC is a plant of some kind. I don't know what group or agency is backing her but when she was elected to congress she was working as a bartender and less than a week later was wearing 200k necklaces to DC fundraisers.
I'm pretty sure there is good documentation there was a literal (and honest to God unrelated to Great White Way sperging) casting call for the gig
 
Virginia incidentally has some of the largest proven Uranium deposits in the world. The Coles Hill Deposit in Pittsylvania County has around 130 million pounds of it.
The moment any extraction is attempted, get ready for all the environmental groups (and ecoterrorists) to kick off a big stink
 
What blows my mind is no one liked Cats. It was played up at the time by critics, then everyone saw it, and realized "wow, these people really like the smell of their own farts." It was mocked into oblivion throughout the 90's to the point that kid's shows like Hey Arnold! made fun of it. There was a similar phenomenon with Rent and it got mocked in Team America: World Police, among other entertainment in the late 2000's/early early 2010's
And I think Cats would work best as some sort of musical competition show where they get up and coming artists to doll up as cats and play their own pieces to see who's the best


I went to a pharmacy once and the Zoomer behind the counter asked my birthday for verification. I told it to him in numbers. He did not know what month my numbers corresponded to. He was not an immigrant. I did not return to that pharmacy. For whatever it's worth, everyone looked at him like he was a retard, but still
Just out of curiosity do you use dd/mm/yyyy or mm/dd/yyyy? It varies from place to place and if you spend enough time on the internet you see both.
 
Short and simple answer, yes, they cook the books. Long answer, they manipulate the data in a lot of ways and to a point that it's not useful or reflects their personal beliefs. Methods used are things like booking Hispanics/blacks as white during arrests. Not allowing race or nationality to be added to certain forms. Over or under sampling certain demographics during surveys and when it's not anything listed above then they will just flat out lie.

Take California for instance, when there was major uptick of crimes happening at their train stations (black on white/Hispanic crime almost exclusively), the camera footage didn't support their racial narrative and was making it's way online. Their response wasn't to add more cops or addresses why the crime was racially biased. Their response was to remove the cameras from the train station.
Science fraud is everywhere now. People should really pay attention to how the information is gathered for a paper. But then again there is no convincing some absolute retard that thinks surveys in any sort of context are credible and accurate sources of information.

Don't believe your lying eyes, bro. Stop Asian hate, you disgusting white chud.
jamal, why are you laughing?
 
Back