Inactive David Simon Gallant - Gets Cucked Every Day, Can't wipe himself; Thirsty AF, Compulsive Masturbator, Unrepentant Racist

The "innocent days" of everyone laughing at him behind his back.

upload_2017-2-27_17-27-19.png


Cow crossover, David felt he should whiteknight for Alison "Maria Mint" Rapp after she got triggered.

upload_2017-2-27_17-51-39.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOLDYSPICY!
  • Agree
Reactions: BlueChan, BOLDYSPICY!, Anonymus Fluhre and 3 others
Kiwi Jeff said:
I think it's funny how we're the "creepy stalkers" even though we've given him more life advice than any of his "friends" on Twitter have.
Click to expand...

Davey should ask himself why Nora, Ali or Jake have never supported him, given him encouragement or even been there to listen. Why do their "friendships" seem like a one-way street, Davey?
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Leo Bonhart, BOLDYSPICY! and Gator Young Henning
:story: :story: :story: :story:
David made a butthurt 'poem' directed towards Ian Miles Cheong.

upload_2017-2-28_18-1-7.png


http://archive.is/NDOqJ#selection-143.0-143.8

Dear Ian
Dear Ian, do you recall
Back in twenty-fifteen
Just a little before your fall
Back into the edgelord scene

Back when you called me your friend
Ensured I was okay
How you even tried to defend
Me after you’d gone your own way

You didn’t drink no fucking Kool-Aid
Weren’t under no fucking spell
As you like to spin it to your new fans
You can try to fucking sell
This fairy tale of being unmade
And they’ll eat right from your hands

It started with The Witcher 3
Some folks mused it was too white
I still don’t know how this could be
What swung you left to right

Now your fists are aimed below
At immigrants, at trans
You picked the easiest as your foe
And it’s won you many fans

The channers, Gaters, so-called “trolls”
Who once called you Nazi
You’ve comfortably come back to the role
In those logs from IRC

Did you ever have a critical eye
Or did you just nod along
When others explained to you the why
The how the right the wrong

Look at your fuckin’ writing
From when you turned ‘til now
You fuckin’ rant about Ess Jay Double-You’s
Tied your morals to the prow
Had yourself a good keelhauling
With the trust I’d had in you.

This is no appeal for your soul
No olive branch in hand
You’ve dug yourself into this hole
And I’m the bitter man

And so, you little feces-demon
Be sure of your identity
Because should you flip again, dear Ian
None wait for thee

Don’t ever flip again, dear Ian
None wait for thee.
#poem #if you don't know who or what it's about don't ask


Cucked by the stupidest shit to get outraged over.

upload_2017-2-28_17-59-1.png


Cucked by garlic.

upload_2017-2-28_17-59-59.png


Cucked by vinegar.

upload_2017-2-28_18-0-23.png


Cucked by Blowy Zoe fucking Five Guys, getting caught, and making Phil Fish flee the internet.

upload_2017-2-28_18-2-50.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ineedahero, Leo Bonhart, BOLDYSPICY! and 3 others
All right, I'm going to give people the detailed version of what Davey is trying to imply with this poem, and give it far more attention than it deserves, because it gives us a pretty great eye towards his version of events. It also gives you a bit of insight into how fucked-up David Gallant's world-view and version of events is.

This should be an entertaining exercise for all involved.

In the first two stanzas, Daveykins harkens back to 2015. He implies heavily that Ian Miles Cheong had "risen above" his chantard origins, and even become respectable in Daveykins' eyes. In an almost uncharacteristically subdued move, David explains that Ian had actually gone to bat defending David within the clique, even after he left it - indicating the very first time David has ever really owned up to how much infighting his own side had. It's very clear that despite any fronting, Ian turning on the clique hurt David Gallant a lot, and you get the impression that David legitimately thought of Ian as a friend. I daresay it's one of the first times we've seen vulnerability from the guy without being filtered by his need to virtue signal.

It's stanza three, however, that throws away that vulnerability and honesty. The need to punish returns forefront, because Ian dared to oppose the clique. Even though David considered him a friend and ally, he must be opposed now. David argues in this stanza that Ian is lying when he claimed to have been misled by the clique, and implies that Cheong solely turned on the clique due to financial reasons. Bear this in mind, because David is going to completely contradict himself a single line later.

In stanza four, David harkens to the incident which caused Cheong to leave the clique entirely. If you are not familiar, members of the clique lost their shit because the Witcher 3 didn't have enough black people in it, when the game itself is a period piece and black people were rarer than hen's teeth in the area the game took place in at the time.

In stanza five, David goes further, labelling Ian "right-wing" and saying he doesn't understand why this would be Cheong's breaking point. What David refuses to realize is that the Witcher 3 controversy was the little top-hat on top of the myriad reasons he left the clique - by this point they had been attacking people solely to push narratives, lying openly, and in service to the clique, Cheong had done something against his own conscience - actually fucking hurt people. He chose to do something that took serious balls, and turned on his clique. He left it. He apologized to those he had wronged. There was no indication he would be accepted by the clique's enemies; it was solely the fact that people could see, in his own words, why he had done it that people accepted it. Davey refuses to see this, despite the fact that Cheong's made it a fact of public record.

In stanza six, we see David go full virtue signal. He declares that Ian is "punching down," now, by mocking immigrants and transpeople. In truth, Ian is simply pointing out the obvious: That unchecked immigration is a fucking disaster for every country that allows it, that most people who claim to be transgendered on Social Media aren't, and that a majority of David's buddies are fucking laughingstocks. Daveykins whines that this is Ian "picking on easy targets," but to be truthful, Ian went after the most vicious fish in the pond, and he knows it. This is the same group that was willing to destroy careers over a fucking hashtag, and Cheong was ground zero when it happened.

In the seventh stanza, David drops anything resembling subtlety and calls Cheong a Nazi. He goes on to state that his edgelording on 4chan was correct and that he has become the nazi he used to joke about. In stanza eight, David tries to figure out why Ian threw off the chains, and comes up with nothing. "My side couldn't have done anything wrong," he thinks to himself. "Obviously Ian just faked being one of us all along" is his conclusion.

In stanza nine, Daveykins argues that IMC's writing has deteriorated from when he left the clique, when in all seriousness, Cheong's writing substantially improved since he left, and the only one who would think otherwise is the clique he left behind. It's the next line, however, that I think really gets to the heart of this piece: David Gallant feels IMC's leaving is a personal affront. IMC left the clique because of his own conscience, but in David's eyes, he did so specifically to hurt David Gallant.

In stanza ten, David confirms exactly what stanza nine implies: He believes Ian left specifically to hurt David and the clique, and he makes clear, in no uncertain terms, that he is salty as fuckover it. David doesn't want any peace between them; he doesn't want any reconciliation; he wants to hurt Cheong the way Cheong did him, and yet he pretty much is incapable of doing so, leaving Gallant to stew in his own impotent rage.

Stanza eleven drives home further that David is fucking pissed about this and further solidifies that he views Cheong's departure, given his friendship previously, as a personal attack. In fact, the implication seems to be that it's the fact that Cheong offered his friendship after he had left the clique that hurt David the most - because David cannot accept that friendship without, in turn, becoming an enemy of the ideology he supports. It would mean admitting that he was wrong, and that his constantly-declared virtue was naught but a sham.

It's the final stanza, however, that makes it very clear: Ultimately, he knows Ian was right. He gives an impassioned plea for Ian to stay in his newfound home, for there will be no forgiveness from the clique for his transgressions. Yet throughout this work, you can see pretty much unambiguously that if anything, he's jealous of IMC for having the spine he will never have.

TL;DR Version: This is fucking amazing. As a written work, it gets across that Gallant knows his entire argument is a house of cards that can't stand up to scrutiny, and IMC leaving was especially hurtful towards him because it forced him to reflect on the very things IMC took issue with. David doesn't have the bravery to go through with what IMC did, and willfully blinds himself to his clique's dealings, but the truth is that David knows exactly why he left and that's what hurts more than anything else.

It's a stark, almost tragic look at the true nature of David Gallant. Almost enough to make you forget for a few minutes that he's a gigantic asshole who's perfectly comfortbable hurting people on behalf of people who don't give a shit about him.
 
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Ineedahero, TheIceCreamMan and 15 others
Whatever analysis you want to do on the poem, I'm sure we can all agree at least that it's fucking terrible - David has no ear for meter whatsoever and the rhymes are clunky at best. Glad you're writing and being creative David but you've a tin ear for poetry at present - read more and in the meanwhile try short prose.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BlueChan, BOLDYSPICY!, Portajohn and 3 others
Jaimas said:
All right, I'm going to give people the detailed version of what Davey is trying to imply with this poem, and give it far more attention than it deserves, because it gives us a pretty great eye towards his version of events. It also gives you a bit of insight into how fucked-up David Gallant's world-view and version of events is.

This should be an entertaining exercise for all involved.

In the first two stanzas, Daveykins harkens back to 2015. He implies heavily that Ian Miles Cheong had "risen above" his chantard origins, and even become respectable in Daveykins' eyes. In an almost uncharacteristically subdued move, David explains that Ian had actually gone to bat defending David within the clique, even after he left it - indicating the very first time David has ever really owned up to how much infighting his own side had. It's very clear that despite any fronting, Ian turning on the clique hurt David Gallant a lot, and you get the impression that David legitimately thought of Ian as a friend. I daresay it's one of the first times we've seen vulnerability from the guy without being filtered by his need to virtue signal.

It's stanza three, however, that throws away that vulnerability and honesty. The need to punish returns forefront, because Ian dared to oppose the clique. Even though David considered him a friend and ally, he must be opposed now. David argues in this stanza that Ian is lying when he claimed to have been misled by the clique, and implies that Cheong solely turned on the clique due to financial reasons. Bear this in mind, because David is going to completely contradict himself a single line later.

In stanza four, David harkens to the incident which caused Cheong to leave the clique entirely. If you are not familiar, members of the clique lost their shit because the Witcher 3 didn't have enough black people in it, when the game itself is a period piece and black people were rarer than hen's teeth in the area the game took place in at the time.

In stanza five, David goes further, labelling Ian "right-wing" and saying he doesn't understand why this would be Cheong's breaking point. What David refuses to realize is that the Witcher 3 controversy was the little top-hat on top of the myriad reasons he left the clique - by this point they had been attacking people solely to push narratives, lying openly, and in service to the clique, Cheong had done something against his own conscience - actually fucking hurt people. He chose to do something that took serious balls, and turned on his clique. He left it. He apologized to those he had wronged. There was no indication he would be accepted by the clique's enemies; it was solely the fact that people could see, in his own words, why he had done it that people accepted it. Davey refuses to see this, despite the fact that Cheong's made it a fact of public record.

In stanza six, we see David go full virtue signal. He declares that Ian is "punching down," now, by mocking immigrants and transpeople. In truth, Ian is simply pointing out the obvious: That unchecked immigration is a fucking disaster for every country that allows it, that most people who claim to be transgendered on Social Media aren't, and that a majority of David's buddies are fucking laughingstocks. Daveykins whines that this is Ian "picking on easy targets," but to be truthful, Ian went after the most vicious fish in the pond, and he knows it. This is the same group that was willing to destroy careers over a fucking hashtag, and Cheong was ground zero when it happened.

In the seventh stanza, David drops anything resembling subtlety and calls Cheong a Nazi. He goes on to state that his edgelording on 4chan was correct and that he has become the nazi he used to joke about. In stanza eight, David tries to figure out why Ian threw off the chains, and comes up with nothing. "My side couldn't have done anything wrong," he thinks to himself. "Obviously Ian just faked being one of us all along" is his conclusion.

In stanza nine, Daveykins argues that IMC's writing has deteriorated from when he left the clique, when in all seriousness, Cheong's writing substantially improved since he left, and the only one who would think otherwise is the clique he left behind. It's the next line, however, that I think really gets to the heart of this piece: David Gallant feels IMC's leaving is a personal affront. IMC left the clique because of his own conscience, but in David's eyes, he did so specifically to hurt David Gallant.

In stanza ten, David confirms exactly what stanza nine implies: He believes Ian left specifically to hurt David and the clique, and he makes clear, in no uncertain terms, that he is salty as fuckover it. David doesn't want any peace between them; he doesn't want any reconciliation; he wants to hurt Cheong the way Cheong did him, and yet he pretty much is incapable of doing so, leaving Gallant to stew in his own impotent rage.

Stanza eleven drives home further that David is fucking pissed about this and further solidifies that he views Cheong's departure, given his friendship previously, as a personal attack. In fact, the implication seems to be that it's the fact that Cheong offered his friendship after he had left the clique that hurt David the most - because David cannot accept that friendship without, in turn, becoming an enemy of the ideology he supports. It would mean admitting that he was wrong, and that his constantly-declared virtue was naught but a sham.

It's the final stanza, however, that makes it very clear: Ultimately, he knows Ian was right. He gives an impassioned plea for Ian to stay in his newfound home, for there will be no forgiveness from the clique for his transgressions. Yet throughout this work, you can see pretty much unambiguously that if anything, he's jealous of IMC for having the spine he will never have.

TL;DR Version: This is fucking amazing. As a written work, it gets across that Gallant knows his entire argument is a house of cards that can't stand up to scrutiny, and IMC leaving was especially hurtful towards him because it forced him to reflect on the very things IMC took issue with. David doesn't have the bravery to go through with what IMC did, and willfully blinds himself to his clique's dealings, but the truth is that David knows exactly why he left and that's what hurts more than anything else.

It's a stark, almost tragic look at the true nature of David Gallant. Almost enough to make you forget for a few minutes that he's a gigantic asshole who's perfectly comfortbable hurting people on behalf of people who don't give a shit about him.
Click to expand...

The idea that people can change from left to right because of a change of ideology as opposed to money is inconceivable to David. it's funny especially considering the money is all the other way. These are people with media access who refuse to believe they're powerful.

For instance, look at this guy implying the mainstream games press didn't try to shut down the consumer revolt:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/dec/01/gamergate-alt-right-hate-trump

gorky said:
Whatever analysis you want to do on the poem, I'm sure we can all agree at least that it's fucking terrible - David has no ear for meter whatsoever and the rhymes are clunky at best. Glad you're writing and being creative David but you've a tin ear for poetry at present - read more and in the meanwhile try short prose.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it doesn't scan and the vocabulary is basic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid and Jaimas
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Ravelord, downloads and 9 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back