Artcow SamanthaPrater / EruzaArto / DefyingGravityAgain / Emily Nicole Cassidy / Willowtheway / Uniloax - Special Ed Art Thief and "Big Bonned" Attention Whore; Perpetual Liar; Cucumber Princess; Negligent Animal Abuser; Twice Investigated for Murder

I would rather be fat and ugly than beautiful and vain like the rest of you claim to be, which by the way NONE of you have posted proof you are skinny people. I feel like half of you are bashing me because your fat. I found out Zuyuri is a plus size as well.

Would rather be ugly because then I'd at least have real friends who treat me honestly as a good person.

if ya want me too, I CAN prove I can remake the edit excatly the same!


Sparkletor 2.0 said:
OMG!!! What are you smoking! Lol
Pocahontas is an Indian princess not a witch. You are dumber than I thought!
Click to expand...
No. seriously. What the hell did you not miss ? I am saying she is a witch as in a bitch, to edit in Vegas. NOT that she is a witch herself. I was censoring myself, you're the idiot here. not me.
 
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: UnFuNnYmEmE and Jarl Varg
For her latest copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy (Archive) many of the points I made earlier today still apply as the issues persist. However, this time around a completely new one is introduced which shall be the only thing I go into detail critiquing this time:
bridneys.png
  1. Transparency - is dead Indian girl a ghost? Why can I see the building through her? Why is masking a gradient from right to left? The orange highlight shows roughly where the gradient begins and ends and odds are was not what was intended. Transparency should be used as a means to blend backgrounds together (if you don't like blurring and smudging) but the point of focus (the girl) really should not have a transparency. If you were going for a ghost, then her entire body should be transparent but obviously her knees are not so this must be a user induced error.
Someone not me should go through the threads and find every version of this Emily has done so we can see it increasingly degrade over the years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: manic dainty gorl, Jarl Varg and Pedophobe
SamanthaPrater said:
No. seriously. What the hell did you not miss ? I am saying she is a witch as in a bitch, to edit in Vegas. NOT that she is a witch herself. I was censoring myself, you're the idiot here. not me.
Click to expand...
So you are prefectly fine calling us all niggers but you need to sensor the b-word?

Hippocrite much?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Jarl Varg
I KNOW THESE ARE CARTOONS FOR KIDS BUT I AM AN ADULT.
T1.png
NOT FOR MINORS, I DO NOT WISH TO INTERACT WITH MINORS UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OLD. I KNOW THESE ARE CARTOONS FOR KIDS BUT I AM AN ADULT. I GREW UP WITH THESE MOVIES SO I EDIT WITH THEM.



@bridney1widney made the original I just animated it. I want to prove I am not a thief.

I am someone- who re-animates things if I like them. I am NOT the Willow who stole. this is messy but I hope they like it any-ways.

I mean Bridney no harm by tagging them.

Disney Movies used are Hunchback of Notre Dame I and Pocahontas I.
I made no money making these and there is enough changed to fall under a grey area.
Oh boy, the frames I didn't even look at are even worse than the one I went with. Look at that trasparency! On another note I may be mistaken but I'm pretty sure Bridney had told Emily to stop tagging her, but Emily shows basic respect and courtesy to nobody that isn't licking her foot as she stomps on them. And Emily absolutely is Willowtheway despite any claims otherwise.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Pedophobe, manic dainty gorl and EllenDrawsRapeOfHerHaters

I couldn't find the face that Bridney used excatly so I did a more concerned look for Esme, and made it more shiny sort of like collecting a Pokemon card.

this is proof I am talented and can duplicate the same details or similar to Bridney1Widney .

I am not a thief, I just got mistaken for one.

Catgirls are Love said:
I KNOW THESE ARE CARTOONS FOR KIDS BUT I AM AN ADULT.
View attachment 7128530
NOT FOR MINORS, I DO NOT WISH TO INTERACT WITH MINORS UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OLD. I KNOW THESE ARE CARTOONS FOR KIDS BUT I AM AN ADULT. I GREW UP WITH THESE MOVIES SO I EDIT WITH THEM.



@bridney1widney made the original I just animated it. I want to prove I am not a thief.

I am someone- who re-animates things if I like them. I am NOT the Willow who stole. this is messy but I hope they like it any-ways.

I mean Bridney no harm by tagging them.

Disney Movies used are Hunchback of Notre Dame I and Pocahontas I.
I made no money making these and there is enough changed to fall under a grey area.
Oh boy, the frames I didn't even look at are even worse than the one I went with. Look at that trasparency! On another note I may be mistaken but I'm pretty sure Bridney had told Emily to stop tagging her, but Emily shows basic respect and courtesy to nobody that isn't licking her foot as she stomps on them. And Emily absolutely is Willowtheway despite any claims otherwise.
Click to expand...
again I refuse to take advice from you unless you willingly admit to being one of the top editors. sorry but I don't want advice from you at all.

you accused me with out asking for proof of otherwise.

fuck off.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: UnFuNnYmEmE and manic dainty gorl
SamanthaPrater said:
I couldn't find the face that Bridney used excatly
Click to expand...
So you tried to make an excat copy? Like, copying the idea and image? One could even say:
SamanthaPrater said:
this is proof I am a idea thief who can duplicate the same details or similar to Bridney1Widney .
Click to expand...
Duplicate. Copy. Facsimile. Unoriginal theft. The accusation is accurate. You are a thief.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Catgirls are Love, Pedophobe, Sparkletor 2.0 and 1 other person
Also, I have been asking nay, demanding for respect as a human so why should I show ANY OF YOU respect when you fatshame me, degrade me as a human etc? threaten to have my Internet cut off, etc?

no , I will not be respecting any- of you any time soon.

Sorry but I am not a thief, and I am not the Willow that stole.

RadioactiveMonkeyMan said:
So you tried to make an excat copy? Like, copying the idea and image? One could even say:

Duplicate. Copy. Facsimile. Unoriginal theft. The accusation is accurate. You are a thief.
Click to expand...
how am I a thief exactly when Disney movies aren't exactly theirs either? You're just mad I provided proof I edit the same way.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: UnFuNnYmEmE
SamanthaPrater said:
how am I a thief exactly when Disney movies aren't exactly theirs either? You're just mad I provided proof I edit the same way.
Click to expand...
Walt Disney took publicly available, unowned folk stories and adapted them utilizing previously unseen animation techniques and technologies.

You copy shit and innovate nothing.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: The Un-Clit, Pedophobe and biggacracka
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back