What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

but it has to be physically over the top of whatever you're scanning and pretty much directly in contact with the ground.
I will freely admit that my knowledge of such things comes from watching Time Team but I’d thought it was limited to ‘there’s some sort of ‘ole ‘ere Tony.’ You can pick up things like foundations if you’re right over it. *
I thought maybe I was missing something, and they’d used the two satellites to measure some other kind of signal.
This is all a bit odd then, no? These guys are academics, you’d think they knew how such things work. There’s something about this that sets of my ‘well this is weird’ detector.
I do want them to dig between the paws though because I think there’s a decent amount of evidence for a passageway at a minimum there.
*it’s always a Roman villa and I find them the dullest episodes
 
I will freely admit that my knowledge of such things comes from watching Time Team but I’d thought it was limited to ‘there’s some sort of ‘ole ‘ere Tony.’ You can pick up things like foundations if you’re right over it. *
I thought maybe I was missing something, and they’d used the two satellites to measure some other kind of signal.
This is all a bit odd then, no? These guys are academics, you’d think they knew how such things work. There’s something about this that sets of my ‘well this is weird’ detector.
I do want them to dig between the paws though because I think there’s a decent amount of evidence for a passageway at a minimum there.
As far as I can tell they claim some weirdass vibration sensing, but I didn't really get into the paper because it didn't involve any of those alleged results Tiktok and so on is raving about rn. This mysterious press release exists nowhere outside these little videos on how the pyramids are generators or death rays or whatever.
I'll reread the paper and see if I understand it a bit better later.
 
ause it didn't involve any of those alleged results Tiktok and so on is raving about
The paper says they think there’s a couple of voids and passages in places they suspected there were passages and voids already. I can’t find this alleged press release either. It doesn’t seem to say anything about massive structures underneath.
This feels peculiar, like a test run to see how an idea spreads
 
The paper says they think there’s a couple of voids and passages in places they suspected there were passages and voids already. I can’t find this alleged press release either. It doesn’t seem to say anything about massive structures underneath.
This feels peculiar, like a test run to see how an idea spreads
Yeah, it definitely seems rather inorganic. NoBueno posted the video a few days ago, and a few days after said it had already spread over tiktok to the point where my normie gf caught wind of it.
 
I will freely admit that my knowledge of such things comes from watching Time Team but I’d thought it was limited to ‘there’s some sort of ‘ole ‘ere Tony.’ You can pick up things like foundations if you’re right over it. *
I thought maybe I was missing something, and they’d used the two satellites to measure some other kind of signal.
This is all a bit odd then, no? These guys are academics, you’d think they knew how such things work. There’s something about this that sets of my ‘well this is weird’ detector.
I do want them to dig between the paws though because I think there’s a decent amount of evidence for a passageway at a minimum there.
*it’s always a Roman villa and I find them the dullest episodes
Since we're on the conspiracy thread-the stuff shown on a mainstream TV series is never gonna be the peak of technology scientists have at their disposal

In fact TV shows are often ordered to not fully elaborate on, or sometimes even lie about, how certain processes are performed like scientific research/legal matters/the creation of drugs, explosives, or anything illegal, or any information about what kind of technology is available to us, so as to not reveal it to the public
 
I will freely admit that my knowledge of such things comes from watching Time Team but I’d thought it was limited to ‘there’s some sort of ‘ole ‘ere Tony.’ You can pick up things like foundations if you’re right over it.
Typically yes. They have a device that can send a ground-penetrating radar beam straight down. They wheel it along a straight line and measure the changes in reflectivity, and if they're really clever the refraction, of the ground the beam is passing through. It produces a 2-dimensional cross-section through the earth, viewed from the side, like an older-style ultrasound. More advanced systems can use doppler effects to create a three-dimensional slice. The bigger devices have to be carried in a plane and run back and forth several times to build up a decent image.
I thought maybe I was missing something, and they’d used the two satellites to measure some other kind of signal.
That's what they say. I misread the abstract initially; their claim is that these satellites can detect tiny movements in the structure, caused by background seismic activity, and that these movements can reveal detailed information about the interior of the pyramids. It's akin to using seismic waves to determine the interior structure of the earth. The problem is, the satellites they're talking about are physically incapable of doing what they claim. Phased doppler array radar can do some amazing things, like detect differences in material density (allowing them to measure clouds and also see through them at the same time, for instance), and can be used to generate fantastically detailed 3-dimensional scans of the ground from space, but the level of movement these people are talking about would be far below the threshold the satellites they're using can sense. At the precision they're discussing, any signal would be overwhelmed by noise. As far as I can tell. what they've done is apply a bunch of filters to what is essentially random noise and made their voids appear out of thin air, because they designed those filters on the assumption that voids of some sort must be there.

I think where the confusion is coming from is that they are academics, but they aren't particularly well-educated in statistics or signal analysis. Combine that with an entirely innocent desire to uncover possible secrets and the fact that egyptology is a field riddled with foundational errors that are nevertheless held as dogma by established academics, and it's very easy to see how they can lean hard into conclusions that are not just wrong, but physically impossible.
 
As we just theorized, the UK government is in fact going ahead with using the show to provide a "solution" to "youth knife crime" by implementing mandatory indoctrination educational classes to scan students for wrongthink misogyny.

Schools are set to give students anti-misogyny lessons in the wake of hit Netflix TV show Adolescence about a teen boy who murders a female classmate.

The classes form part of the government's new relationships, health and sex education (RHSE) guidance, which will be introduced before the end of the academic year.

It comes after Sir Keir Starmer revealed at Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday that he was watching the mini-series with his two teenagers - and that he backs the show creators' calls for it to be shown in parliament and schools.

The four-episode programme follows the Miller family, whose lives are torn apart when their 13-year-old son Jamie is arrested for stabbing a female classmate to death after being influenced by online misogyny.

The drama, released ten days ago, was the most-watched show on Netflix worldwide last weekend, gripping audiences with its sobering portrayal of how social media and misogynistic influencers can impact young boys.

Though Labour's classroom guidance is still being developed, it is understood to include content to 'support healthy relationships', to 'enable schools to tackle harmful behaviour and ensure that misogyny is stamped out and not allowed to proliferate', an insider source said, the Times reported.

From as early as primary school, children will be encouraged to 'express and understand boundaries, handle disappointment and pay attention to the needs and preferences of oneself and others', with content modified for older children to reflect the 'real-life complexities of romantic and sexual relationships', the source added.

The development comes as a win for the Netflix show's co-writers, Jack Thorne and actor Stephen Graham - who stars as the teen boy's father - who have said they wanted Adolescence to be a programme that 'causes discussion and makes change'.

The new guidance will encourage students to 'think about what healthy sexual relationships involve' - including 'consent', along with 'kindness, attention and care'.

As children progress to secondary school, classroom content will start to include the 'communication and ethics' needed for healthy romantic and sexual relationships.

Topics covered will range from dynamics of power and vulnerability, to tools to manage 'difficult emotions', like disappointment and anger, that can affect relationships.

The effects of misogynistic online content and pornography on both young people's sexual behaviour and their views of relationship norms will also be discussed.

Education secretary Bridget Phillipson has faced pressure to overturn RSHE guidance drafted by the previous Conservative government - which included bans on sex education for children under nine and discussions of gender identity.

Adolescence was praised last week by the parents of a survivor of the Southport stabbings for drawing attention to the 'terrifying' impacts of online misogynistic content on young men.

Axel Rudakubana, then 17, stabbed their daughter - known as Child A - more than 30 times during his brutal attack on a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in July last year. He killed three young girls - and was jailed for life in January.

The parents, in a statement read out by their MP during a debate on knife crime in the House of Commons on Thursday, said influencers like Andrew Tate are having a 'terrifying' impact on teen boys, who needed to be protected from this content.

Rudakubana cleared most of his online search history before the murders - so it is not known whether he viewed any content associated with Tate.

Triple murderer Kyle Clifford - who shot his ex-girlfriend Louise Hunt and her sister Hannah with a crossbow and stabbed their mother Carol - is known to have viewed Tate's videos before making his ferocious attacks.

Teachers were told in government guidance released last year to look out for signs of misogyny and 'incel culture' in students aged 14 and over, which could lead to sexual abuse, violence and suicide.

The education secretary warned teachers to watch out for teen boys who had been indoctrinated by 'manosphere' influencers into 'hating women'.

Last week, former England football manager Sir Gareth Southgate blasted 'callous, manipulative and toxic influencers' for leading young men towards misogyny.

At the BBC's annual Richard Dimbleby lecture, he said the 'sole drive' of these pernicious online creators is their 'own gain': 'They willingly trick young men into believing that success is measured by money or dominance, that strength means never showing emotion, and that the world, including women, is against them.'

MailOnline
Archive [March 23 2025]
 
implementing mandatory indoctrination educational classes to scan students for wrongthink misogyny.
it amazes me the levels of pattern observation that these people ARE capable of when they set their mind to it, leading me to believe them ignoring all other patterns must be intentional
they're leaning so hard on the fact that a MALE (!!!) murdered a FEMALE (wowza!), but completely ignoring all other possibilities regarding the potential motive or any known information about this case

what i think is really funny is how all the reasoning for this goes back to the netflix show, every decision is backed by the netflix show, every reference to why such a thing might be necessary is "well i was watching the netflix show-" which is really odd out of context
of course it makes sense when you realize they can't talk about the real case that the show is based on, so they're using the show as a proxy, but i think it'd be really funny if all the opposition just started grilling them on this really hard, demanding to know why they're going through all this trouble for something depicted in a piece of media
what will happen first: the psyopping, sweeping this program under the rug, or them finally admitting that the show is based on a real case and being forced to talk about it in depth?
 
it'd be really funny if all the opposition just started grilling them on this really hard, demanding to know why they're going through all this trouble for something depicted in a piece of media

The only opposition in a position to do so in the UK is the controlled Nigel Farage one. Rupert Lowe would do it but he is getting sabotaged hard.
 
As we just theorized, the UK government is in fact going ahead with using the show to provide a "solution" to "youth knife crime" by implementing mandatory indoctrination educational classes to scan students for wrongthink misogyny.
Funny, because the show white washed the stabber who it was based on.

Europe is in a new Dark Age, especially the UK.
 
We brought freedom to Europe eighty years ago, we can do it again. It'll be even easier since none of them have actual militaries.
Well, they'll have to do it themselves again, it'll just take a few hundred years like last time. I don't think we should bother them until they remove their heads from their asses, all they do is shame us while they self-flagellate.
 
Someone linked a good 9/11 documentary several pages back. Good watch, brings back memories of the early 2000s when you would have 9/11 conspiracy shit everywhere and it wasn't cracked down by "debunkers" like you have now.
Is there a similar kind of video on dancing isrealites? It's been years and I forgot what the theories behind that were.
 
There is not going to be some large structure under the Pyramids on the Giza Plataue.

The evolution of Pyramids being built and the timeline is well documented. You can literally go and visit them yourself.

Pyramid construction evolved gradually, starting with mud-brick mastabas, progressing to stone mastabas, and then advancing to the Step Pyramid. This was followed by experimental attempts with overly steep and unstable designs, such as the Bent Pyramid, before achieving success with the Red Pyramid. Over a span of a few hundred years, this progression led to the grand Giza Pyramids. It’s implausible that, in this final phase, the builders abruptly shifted to constructing massive underground structures alongside the already monumental surface achievements.
 
There is not going to be some large structure under the Pyramids on the Giza Plataue.

The evolution of Pyramids being built and the timeline is well documented. You can literally go and visit them yourself.

Pyramid construction evolved gradually, starting with mud-brick mastabas, progressing to stone mastabas, and then advancing to the Step Pyramid. This was followed by experimental attempts with overly steep and unstable designs, such as the Bent Pyramid, before achieving success with the Red Pyramid. Over a span of a few hundred years, this progression led to the grand Giza Pyramids. It’s implausible that, in this final phase, the builders abruptly shifted to constructing massive underground structures alongside the already monumental surface achievements.
Nice try, Zahi Hawass. Listen, there IS a secret chamber underneath the Sphinx and it holds the Akashic Record. Edgar Cayce said it was there. You can't hide the truth anymore!
 
Anyone see that shitty slopflix documentary based on Oneill's book Chaos? Man what a waste of 90 mins.
Do you know how hard it would be for O’Neil to accidentally avoid talking about The Process Church of the Final Judgement regarding the Manson murders? That’s quite the elephant in the room.

I liked Chaos, but when that dog didn’t bark I knew O’Neil was not being fully forthcoming.
 
Since we're on the conspiracy thread-the stuff shown on a mainstream TV series is never gonna be the peak of technology scientists have at their disposal

In fact TV shows are often ordered to not fully elaborate on, or sometimes even lie about, how certain processes are performed like scientific research/legal matters/the creation of drugs, explosives, or anything illegal, or any information about what kind of technology is available to us, so as to not reveal it to the public
It makes sense that a show like Breaking Bad wouldn't give an easily reproducible recipe for making meth, or something showing how to make bombs or poison.
As for the actual peak of technology, I don't know. I work in a high tech field, on a pretty cutting edge project, but there isn't really anything out of the ordinary there. But this is mainly laser physics and material sciences, nothing a TV series would show much about in detail, and it wouldn't really interest anyone.
Maybe stuff like directed energy weapons, but well, military laser tech isn't exactly hidden, and the physical limitations prevent them from being these kinda pinpoint satellite death rays or whatever.
Seriously, getting into laser technology was so disappointing in many ways. They look so much cooler in the scifi I used to read...
 
Do you know how hard it would be for O’Neil to accidentally avoid talking about The Process Church of the Final Judgement regarding the Manson murders? That’s quite the elephant in the room.

I liked Chaos, but when that dog didn’t bark I knew O’Neil was not being fully forthcoming.
Now that you mention wtf iirc its also the elmers glue that ties alot of serial killers together too.
 
Back