US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Blacks make up only 27% of all SNAP recipients, yet commit 80% of the fraud. New stat meme just dropped (as new as data cited in 2020 gets).
It also is a break down of overall SNAP recipients, not by population, which would mean that despite being 13% of the population, blacks double the amount of SNAP received. Mind you, more blacks are probably using SNAP since I doubt plenty of felons using babymomma's cards are counted.

It looks like hispanic got double counted as well to inflate white numbers, which is "normal" in these sorts of studies (same happens with crime). You can tell as well since the math between the non-hispanic white and dedicated hispanic literally don't work together at all, nor does working backwards off of simply the white-white non hispanic. I honestly have no clue what they're trying to show here since the math ain't mathing outside of bullshit presentation to try and overinflate whites.

Also the math ain't mathing in general. It's been a long while since I've done statistics, but I'm relatively certain this is not okay. More nerd oriented kiwis might be able to explain it better, because even generous rounding shouldn't be that shitty.
 
I don't know the first thing about it, but I'm pretty sure there's something similar going on with zero-sugar energy drinks. Every once in a while I'll get into a long rut where I feel like I can't function without a couple a day, and it takes me forever to kick it and go clean.
Could be a few different things.
They often have b vitamins which can help with energy.
L-carnitine may impact depression symptoms (fatigue, low motivation, etc) if you're not getting enough from your diet.
Vitamin C, caffeine, ginseng...
You could try regularly supplementing methylated b vitamins and see if you feel better. You'll just piss out the extra if you don't need it.
Carnitine is in meat. Your body can make it, but recent evidence suggests maybe not enough in all situations so you need to get some from diet too.
Or maybe you're just addicted to that sweet pop fizz dopamine hit of cracking open a can and drinking something refreshing.
Who knows man.

Edit: I really don't understand the outrage around limiting what SNAP covers. I definitely understand being cautious so the poor aren't forced to become vegan soyslop consumers against their will, but limiting based off of strict conditions that can't easily be used to do ill if the power shifts is reasonable.

Or do people think that Medicare and Medicaid should cover cosmetic surgery, teeth grills, or other random shit like that so people's freedoms aren't restricted too?

Anything involving tax money will necessarily be limited. It has to be because there's a finite amount of tax money and it's allotted for a specific purpose. You should not be exclusively relying on it if at all humanly possible, and if you are you shouldn't be planning to do so forever. It should also be strict enough to sure it's meeting the intended goal while being as efficient as possible.

That's the trade off of using gibs - you only should be able to use it for what's absolutely necessary that won't cause more problems that taxpayers will have to pay for down the road.
 
Last edited:
White: 39.8%
"Hispanic White": 22.9%
Black: 27%
Asian: 3.8%
All other races: 6.6%
---
Total: 100.1%

4.1% are "Hispanic" and not "Hispanic White", and are included in the 27% Black, 3.8% Asian, and 6.6% "All other races". My assumption would be most of them are in the "All other races".

Edit: Numbers assuming above paragraph is true:
White: 39.8%
"Hispanic": 27%
Black: 27%
Asian: 3.8%
All other races: 2.5%
---
Total: 100.1%

These race percentages are by household. Roughly 22 million households receive SNAP. Households average just under 2 people (1.89).
SR_2023.07.19_SNAP_2.png
 
Last edited:
Trump stated that 100% of the money made from the Trump Card (the proper name) will go towards paying off the national debt. what are the chances this is true? It seems too good to be true even for Trump since that would knock off billions of dollars from our debt.
As we've discovered over the past 10 years or so, budgets are fungible. You can tax people to say, get rid of drybrush under trees, and they just move the tax income out of that fund into another one to breed retarded fish instead. It's possible Trump will force that into the debt, but it's more likely it'll enter the federal budget and then vanish.

Also, I do not believe you appreciate the scale of the problem. None of us do, because we're not hardwired to handle values like this.

The US National debt at this exact moment is 36,000 billion dollars.

Trump's Gold Card costs 0.005 Billion Dollars each. We would need to sell 7,200,000 gold cards to take down the debt, and it's highly, highly, HIGHLY, likely the Uniparty and RINOs would just immediately spend it elsewhere instead of paying it down, preferably someplace they can embezzle it, as they've done since time immemorial.
 
Obesity in this country is no fucking joke, and it’s getting to a level where “muh freedom” needs to stop being an argument to excuse and allow this self harm
The solution, and it's one that should be done everywhere is put a tax on being fat. Make it 10% of income or something else that scalable.
Banning food, taxing certain food higher, taxing other food less is just beating around the bush and punishing thin people too.
Tax the fat. Also deny them healthcare for being fat.
 
how do we decide how much do people get? like a uniform amount?
You examine volatility in food markets, and then artificially create demand through consumption subsidies where needed.
People share/trade their SNAP bennies all the time. If you got a bunch of something you dont like, find someone willing to trade for something you do.
People doing this is what got junk food made eligible for consumption subsidies in the first place.

Recipients use SNAP to get $50 of steak and lobster because their neighbor with a job agreed to pay them $10 for it, which they could then use to buy sodie pops and hot chip. Imagine if we just covered those things? Then their SNAP benefits would last so much longer!

Thing is, this misunderstands SNAP as a supplemental nutrition assistance program rather than a consumption subsidy to stabilize food markets through artificially created demand. Junk food manufacturers do not need this market manipulation to help the junk food sector from collapsing. And as for the entitlement fraud, whether the stuff purchased with SNAP actually goes to feed hungry children or is sold at a discount to someone else so the SNAP recipient can buy cocaine and hookers isn't relevant to the function of artifically creating demand for covered products.

But if we educated people that SNAP isn't about feed poor hungry children, it loses its unassailable political optics.
my sincerest apologies to SNAP recipients i feel responsible
If junk food is removed from SNAP, you may see junk food prices come down as the artificially subsidized demand is removed.

You may also contemplate the meta-possibility of putting junk food on SNAP in order to drive up the price. Productive members of society see the higher prices and fewer of them buy it, improving their health outcomes. The poor people feeding on junk are sacrificial consumers.
 
It the aspartame
In another study, aspartame, acesulfame potassium, and saccharin were all associated with heightened motivation to eat and more items selected on a food preference list [35]. Aspartame had the most pronounced effect, possibly because it does not have a bitter aftertaste.
drink diet = crave more= eat more = thirst more = weight gain.
Aspartame breaks down into three components in the body: aspartic acid, methanol, and phenylalanine. Phenylalanine is an amino acid that’s a precursor to tyrosine, which is used to produce dopamine and norepinephrine. In theory, this could indirectly influence mood-related hormones, but the amount of phenylalanine from typical aspartame consumption (e.g., a diet soda) is tiny compared to what you get from regular foods like meat, eggs, or dairy. So, it’s unlikely to have a noticeable effect on feel-good hormones.
I remember writing a report on asparteme and its health implications in high school and the teacher said she wasn't impressed with my fundings, or something along those lines. Bitch was wrong I was right.
 
there's your problem
I love the concept of "white" and "white (not hispanic)", peak mutt world lunacy. It COMPLETELY fucks any demographic break down when we talk about almost anything since so many "white people" show up in a ton of datapoints they probably shouldnt.
In all likelihood, a lot of those white statistics are "white hispanics."
 
Michael “Get on that trampoline and bounce, and I’ll make you a star!” Bay has always been a Republican (or at worst the kind of Democrat Trump used to be) he helped grow the American Machismo memes from the ground up. I mean how could you not tell?
Nothing says America like blowing up a piece of it for show.
 
Back