US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Britain was not the largest superpower in the world at the time. France and Spain were each stronger than Britain back in the 1700s, and BOTH OF THEM helped the USA.

In 1776, the Spanish Empire was officially in the "Shit My Pants And Die" phase.

A backwater country like Russia could give the British enough resistance that the Brits would need the French to help them keep Moscow away from gobbling up the Ottomans.

Aside from your history of the Crimean War being wrong, the world of 1845 has much in common politically and militarily with the world of 1776 as the world of 1985 does to the world of 1914.
 
In 1776, the Spanish Empire was officially in the "Shit My Pants And Die" phase.
To wit, the French being anything more than a bankroller during the American Revolution is a stretch. They were on the cusp of all-out revolution on their own soil, which would come to pass shortly after our own. Britain, on the other hand, would remain powerful enough to bankroll the majority of the entire European continent (including those very same Spaniards) across several devastating losses to Napoleon's French Empire, the strength of which wouldn't be realized until much later, after our own revolution and collapse of their nation.

To suggest Britain was anything less than the most powerful nation on the planet at the time is foolish. Not even Napoleon could conquer them, and that was when he controlled the majority of the continent while Britain bled its own purse dry.
 
this is just what happened to the boomers with the hippies, and we had to spend our entire lives nodding our heads to their kumbuya bullshit in kindergarden which basically fully indoctrinated every subsequent generation against them. imagine how fucking bad it's going to be for trannies
You're telling me there's a possible future where "Okay, tranny" is both a publicly accepted meme and a way to shut up annoying old faggots?

I better put this fruit juice down, I have my health to look out for! Here's to the future, everyone!
 
About ten years ago, while in line at the local Walmart, I stood behind a horrifically fat black woman wearing the tightest pink yoga pants ever spray painted onto a 4ft wide ass, as she spent 20 straight minutes screaming bloody murder at the cashier, insisting that her SNAP card could in fact pay for her liquor and cigarettes.

Finally, when the bewildered teenager called her manager over to deal with the land cow, the woman finally got fed up, yanked a literal roll of about $200 from her purse, and paid for her liquor and cigs separately. I learned everything I need to know about food stamps that day.

If it were up to me, food stamps would cover rice, flour, and potatoes. Basic staples, nothing else.

Hell, I'll even be nice and toss in some Vienna sausages as a meat dish. You can live on those things.

b25d22a5-e4e1-4e13-a46f-f08cc03d1fe7_screenshot.jpg
 
It's not good enough for the Dems to simply shut up about trannies. Not after all of the laws they've installed to protect them. No, they need to right the ship and actively work to walk that shit out of the books. Not having the conversation doesn't move things in that direction, and in fact we've been seeing a handful of libshit holdouts making a big scene out of trying to litigate for them.

If it's going to move anywhere and be legitimized, some Dem old guards are going to need to give detransers a platform to bring to light how they were groomed by men in skirts, then mutilated by back alley surgeons, all for the sexual gratification and monetary gain of the parties involved.
The left would rather see this country completely collapse than to take out even one troon they installed to groom these kids, politically and literally.
I agree with the sentiment but I don't believe that will happen. Libs generally don't admit being wrong about things because they are the side of moral goodness as opposed to moral practicality. Progress is an arrow, it can't turn around. I don't believe they're constitutionally capable of realizing that their impulse to help the weak can be parasitized to enable the sick and violent. Has a progressive ever said "we were wrong on that one?"
The sick and violent ARE their main core supporter base. Have you not seen the recent DNC or watched the news lately? Any sane democrat left the plantation a long time ago.
 
To follow up on this, Elon pretty much confirmed the chat was business as usual, and there is unlikely to be any reprisal from the executive branch outside of maybe canning Waltz for being a retard.
View attachment 7133622
Source | Archive
I think people don't care so much that Signal was used for office communication, or slack, or microsoft teams. I think people find it odd that it was used to talk about an ongoing bombing campaign. Is there evidence that this happened before this year?

In addition to the more obvious problem that some random person was added to it.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
The sick and violent ARE their main core supporter base. Have you not seen the recent DNC or watched the news lately? Any sane democrat left the plantation a long time ago.
What you say is true inside major cities, but it's not true in every other part of the country. There are many normal people who are middle-class, live in suburbs, have rarely interacted with minorities or troons or foreigners, and thus have a much more optimistic view of them than reality would demand. These are dyed-in-the-wool Democrats. Just go to any state in the Northeast and talk to like 5 people, you'll find one.
 
I think people don't care so much that Signal was used for office communication, or slack, or microsoft teams. I think people find it odd that it was used to talk about an ongoing bombing campaign. Is there evidence that this happened before this year?
I mean, what else would office stuff be if not if we need to bomb things and how? And how do you think people talk about these things?

Remember Clinton and her emails?

And considering every Gov uses WhatsApp or Signal already it was obviousluy used in the past. No one leaked stuff while stuff was happening. Even here this stuff was leaked after the Raiid.
In addition to the more obvious problem that some random person was added to it.
A random person was not added. This was very obviously deliberate.
 
Last edited:
I reccomend Michael Malice's book The New Right.
I can't recommend that book highly enough, even though it is probably dated at this point as a number of people he talked about as relevant in the "new right" are really not anymore (i.e., Gavin McInnes, Ann Coulter, etc). It's a great read and a good window into that unique 2016-18 period.
 
What you say is true inside major cities, but it's not true in every other part of the country. There are many normal people who are middle-class, live in suburbs, have rarely interacted with minorities or troons or foreigners, and thus have a much more optimistic view of them than reality would demand. These are dyed-in-the-wool Democrats. Just go to any state in the Northeast and talk to like 5 people, you'll find one.
Outliers, Democratic Party is now an asylum run by the inmates. These people simply didn't get the memo, or don't care, either way says a lot about them.
Alright I've been fucked up cus of some health issues. What's this "Top Secret" leaks that I've been hearing about?
Our politicians have gay chatrooms where they shit on Europe and plan out their sandnigger bombing campaigns. A journo was "accidentally" invited there and leaked some conversations.
 
I honestly hate American commercials. For one thing, the fucking fine print lying and the speed talking bullshit. Then the ads are always the most basic bitch shit ever.
When I'm with family and sports happens to be on (the only time I watch TV) I like to see whether there are any commercials that only feature white people. I can't remember the last time I saw one that wasn't for life insurance or depression meds.
 
Amazing that Trump's administration can do something like use unsecured chat to plan a military strike and you will still defend him. And if they're using Signal for this, they're using it for EVERYTHING
I don't think it terribly matters since it seems like kayfabe and bullshitting at a round table anyway, if it were tippy top secret it would be secret. Also assuming the use of signal for everything is a pretty big leap to make based on a sample size of "1"

Though I will say, the optics of it does bring to mind The hood classic of THE GRYEYYT COUNTYER OFFENSYIVE which might as well had a movie trailer, a billboard and a netflix ad as it was openly talked about for months ahead of time then people were genuinely baffled why the hell there was no shock and a distinct lack of awe. :story:
 
I agree with the sentiment but I don't believe that will happen. Libs generally don't admit being wrong about things because they are the side of moral goodness as opposed to moral practicality. Progress is an arrow, it can't turn around. I don't believe they're constitutionally capable of realizing that their impulse to help the weak can be parasitized to enable the sick and violent. Has a progressive ever said "we were wrong on that one?"
At its very heart progressives are politically opportunistic. Ever since Obama went on TV and said some violent nog teenager could have been his very son it's been downhill.

Its the politics of opportunity and a bastardized understanding of two things. The ends justifies the means and once we have power we will do things the right way. Creating an endless spiral.
 
I don't think it terribly matters since it seems like kayfabe and bullshitting at a round table anyway, if it were tippy top secret it would be secret. Also assuming the use of signal for everything is a pretty big leap to make based on a sample size of "1"

Though I will say, the optics of it does bring to mind The hood classic of THE GRYEYYT COUNTYER OFFENSYIVE which might as well had a movie trailer, a billboard and a netflix ad as it was openly talked about for months ahead of time then people were genuinely baffled why the hell there was no shock and a distinct lack of awe. :story:
Libtards are the least credulous people on the planet, I could see Vance and Hegseth discovering the Biden admin was using Signal, sitting down and trying to figure out how to use it for media control and shit talking the parasitic Eurofags, and then laughing that the dumb fucks on Team Blue think this was an accident. The tell will be if someone actually gets in real trouble or not. It's like someone in the admin read the memetic_sisyphus tweet about how libs believe fiction is reality and decided to run with it.

Trump has spent most of his life jerking the media along on a leash like the small, yappy dog they are and the fucking retarded subhumans just go along with it.

Edit:
LibsDon'tKnowThings.jpg
 
Mate, here in Canada, they run adverts for mobile gaming apps. Not gacha games. Actual slot machines in the palm of your hand.
Maybe it's just a LiveTV thing, but every single one of them is constantly running adverts for straight up casino gambling apps.
Hey, you need to gamble your money away to chase that dopamine high before MAIDing yourself in the totally Not dystopia of modern Canada!

A fellow will remember a lot of things you wouldn't think he'd remember. You take me. One day, back in 1896, I was crossing over to Jersey on the ferry, and as we pulled out, there was another ferry pulling in, and on it there was a horrifically fat black woman wearing the tightest pink yoga pants ever spray painted onto a 4ft wide ass, as she spent 20 straight minutes screaming bloody murder at the cashier, insisting that her SNAP card could in fact pay for her liquor and cigarettes. She didn't see me at all, but I'll bet a month hasn't gone by since that I haven't thought of that girl. I learned everything I need to know about food stamps that day.
That's one of my favorite scenes from Citizen Kane.
019c65ea-6844-450e-b7ae-565908aeb231_text.gif
 
Amazing that Trump's administration can do something like use unsecured chat to plan a military strike and you will still defend him. And if they're using Signal for this, they're using it for EVERYTHING
Nah I won't lie, I'm half with you. However the other side of that coin means if Trump's admin was doing it, everyone was. I think we just vastly overestimated our government.
 
Back