Manosphere Andrew Tate / Top G / Cobratate - Egotistical MRA "influencer", arrested for trafficking in Romania, lied about having lung cancer

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Because it's a huge industry that has no shortage of girls signing up.
Is that why needs to lovebomb girls from poor countries, move them to the armpit of Europe, isolate them from friends and family and variously control or threaten them so they don't leave?
I mean, welcome to realities of employment.
Were you born naturally this retarded or did your momma fancy a stiff drink when she carried you?
Per various docs and vids: The girls are on "allowances" that are a fraction of their earnings, they get around moved from flat to flat according to their performance, the Tates make up bullshit taxes to cut into payouts. They also have little to no overhead, given that they operate on sites like OF and MFC exclusively.
 
Last edited:
Another day another Tater Tot pops up to say
"WOMEN CAN'T BE ABUSED BECAUSE THEY'RE ADULTS!!! ARE YOU SOME SORT OF MISOGYNIST THAT YOU DON'T SUPPORT A PEDOPHILE PIMP?"
"WHAT CRIME DID THEY COMMIT WHAT CRIME DID THEY COMMIT! ME TOO STUPID TO KNOW WHAT CRIME THEY COMITTED! WHERE'S THE EVIDENCE WHERE'S THE EVIDENCE ME TOO STUPID TO KNOW WHAT THE EVIDENCE IS! WHAT'S THAT EVIDENCE OF ME TOO STUPID FOR ME TO KNOW WHAT IT'S EVIDENCE OF! EXPLAIN TO ME WHY THAT'S WRONG/EXPLAIN TO ME HOW THAT'S A CRIME"
Over and over and over again just like the last 57!
 
I'm such an alpha pimp, the MATRIX is attacking me WTF I have done nothing wrong.

Gm68Up3bYAIqXTh.jpg
 
Yeah but Tate boasting about being "Top G" and a "Pimp" and being a slaver, are two very different things. Also the impact of being a sex slaver is lost the further it moves away from the most brutal and obvious forms that come to mind for most people (which is a factor here because this IS about reputational destruction). It's comparable to statutory rape vs actual violent physical rape. In the UK, spreading rumours about people in their social circles actually falls under the definition of "stalking", which means that the Tates could be victims of "stalking" despite this not being what comes to mind for most people.

Based on these definitions, what precisely is the legal way to recruit porn actors or glamour models? or even cam models tbh? Also.. there's a lot of female cam models that will film themselves having sex with fans or perhaps more frequently, will coerce their boyfriends into performing with them, which could result in a surprising number of sex-trafficked males at the hands of female sex terrorists.
Take a close look at the means section. I mean it should be obvious to a blind man the difference. For the record, these are legal definitions.

1000029120.png


Tate, by his own free admission, has set out to find girls, make them fall in love with him (deception), for the express purpose of getting them to work webcam (sexual exploitation), where he then doesn't let them keep their own logins(abuse of power, coercion), pretends to hold back 50% for taxes(deception, fraud), which he then doesn't pay.

By his own words, he doesn't let his girls out by themselves, seeks to isolate them from their families. He has made extensive videos on this when teaching others how to do it.

Because Tate has also been so good to keep an extensive WhatsApp history, like a real Top G, we also know that he uses violence and threats of violence in order for compliance.

So, you take an Act (Recruit, Transport, Transfer (to România). You then take the Means (Violence, Theeats of Violence, Fraud, Deception, Coercion, Abuse of Power. Then you take the Purpose Sexual Exploitation).

It's a premeditated decision, practiced over and over again. Because the doofus literally confessed all this on video, there isn't even any ambiguity.
 
It's comparable to statutory rape vs actual violent physical rape.
Are you seriously going so far to say that raping children isn't that bad compared to "actual violent rape"? Are you retarded? Why do you have to power scale rape in order to make Tate look better?

I mean, keep in mind their fame really skyrocketed during Covid19 lockdowns when Joe Biden was president. The same people calling them traffickers were the same people deeply involved in mass trafficking operations via illegal immigration channels. A lot of that stuff is being dug up and dumped into public view now and with the JFK thing coming out, is there any point in pretending the "Matrix" (gay movie btw) thing wasn't true?
"The government has been hiding fucked up shit and then revealing it later, there's finally proof! There was no way anyone could've known this before Joe Biden's presidency, what an innovator Tate is! We all live in a simulation and everyone's out to get me! Daddy Tate was right, so I have to give him 50 bucks a month to break freee!!"

The fuck has Tate done to educate you about the corruption in the government or da matrix beyond just saying buzzwords and chimping out at people on Twitter? His method of "escaping" involves you paying him 50 USD a month to enter his shitty online courses and promote it to other people like an MLM scheme. The corruption you're talking about has been present in the government for longer than any of us has been alive and has been getting pointed out by people for longer than you've been able to read. Tate isn't your friend, he isn't trying to help you or let you learn more about it, he's trying to get money out of you by pointing out real things like governmental corruption and male social issues in the most shallow way possible (literally by comparing it to a movie in the most Redditfag way possible) just to get you listening and then get you to give him money, or spread his content to some other retard who will pay up.

You clearly know little to nothing about Tate or the accusations being levied against him, and it sounds to me like you've only been paying attention to politics within the last 4 years. Please spend less time fagging out for a mulatto who just wants to squeeze money out of you and more time reading. History goes back beyond the Covid-19 pandemic and Biden's presidency.
 
Inb4 yet another fag comes in, and still tries to say there's no proof of Tate being a rapist sex-trafficker.
What are the keywords I need to search in this thread to get some definitive proof to show to other people? I remember KF has the video of him fucking one of his camgirls, but that doesnt really incriminate him, he's just doing an obvious pimp thing to me. There was also the video of him beating a camgirl, but people dismiss it as she later said it was a consensual fetish play thing (which I dont believe, the women he acquires arent the smartest bunch and she was probably given money to change her story).

Honestly, after writing this I realize that if those two things, along with some of the dumb shit he's said dont change your opinion on Tate, then you're groyper levels of beyond salvation. The pimp life was never something to flaunt, there was even a book about that, how black pimps knew they were bottom of the barrel criminals and werent respected in the underworld. Rules of the pimp game or something.

Edit: I had forgotten about the war room trafficking tutorial. Honestly the pages from the quoted comment up to mine is enough proof that Tate is an iredeemable POS. I do sort of agree with @Astral Dragoon that there are a lot of whores working for Tate willingly, and some of these whores are responsible for their own fate and deserve the accountability. But even if they were 100% going with the program, Tate still used despicable and manipulative tactics to keep them there.
 
Last edited:
That thing is rape. Pimps rape.
He has confessed to everything on video ITT.
View attachment 7136873
I mean, one could say its consensual, since as far as I remember, the girl wasn't struggling or anything. But you can also say that Tate has systematically raped her in the past and now she's simply... "googles female for buck"... Doe broken (sorry) and just lets him dominate her, be it out of fear or need for resources. Yeah, I'm willing to agree it's both mental and physical rape, sadly the pimp MO.
 
Looking at Viva Frei I see this tweet from Dick Masterson:

You know you are down bad, when you get corrected by fucking Dick out of all people.
View attachment 7125662

I also stumbled over this image, showing Barnes, Cernovich, Raheem Kassam and Ali fucking Alexander.

View attachment 7125667

Edit: Forgot to add, JACOB WOHL also seems to be in the picture. The one sitting in front of Ali "pedo" Alexander.

I survived the 80s and 90s with no AIDS but then I had to see this picture
 
You didn't read what I wrote.
I'll try and simplify for you:
The reputational damage requires substantiated impact. Legal definitions that would classify the boyfriends of cam girls bullied into "putting on a show" as being the trafficked sex slave victims of their cam girl girlfriends will not cause the same reputational damage as physical, forced sex slavery of adults and children such as the kind found operating in and around Americas Southern Border or in the Manors and offices of BBC employees or Conservative or Labour party MPs, Lords and/or Royals.
The latter provokes a genuine aggressive and murderous response (unironic IRA assassination of Lord Mountbatten territory), the former by contrast provokes laughter, especially when the accusers are involved in the latter in the cases where they aren't also flat out Left wing paedophilia activists.
To be honest you seem a few sandwiches short of a picnic.

Let me simplify it for you. Sex trafficking by the lover boy method is actually a crime and is recognised as such by more than 175 countries, including every country in Europe and the US. This isn't some fringe crime never prosecuted. It is the vastly most committed and prosecuted form of human trafficking, including in România.

Tate has admitted all of this on his own videos. That's before you even look at his WhatsApp history and witness statements. He is guilty as sin.

If you want me to say that the sex trafficking in a movie like Taken is worse, sure, I agree, but I don't see what that has to do with anything. Tate is accused of trafficking and grooming 15 year olds, anally raping them, physical and sexual violence. He is a piece of shit. He isn't being prosecuted because of politics. He is being prosecuted because Tristan messed up and picked a victim with concerned patents, whom was also a US citizen and when that call came in, Tate's local corruption was worthless.
 
There's very real sex predators, rapists and slavers out there, many with big ties to big governments, big business, big religion and big political/ideological media campaigns. When one is aware of this and opposed to it, shit like this provokes a response of "why are you wasting my fucking time with this shit?"
You're making it sound like Tate is just some guy and not a public figure with a significant level of influence who should be scrutinized. It's also not like people criticizing Tate are saying ALL resources should be diverted from more serious crimes towards stopping the Tates.
 
Like the US Democrats or the UK Conservative party.
Then there's the Judeo-Christian Conservatives and Groypists. In fact the three main Jewish religions all believe in daughter selling and paedophilia. By trying to suppress information about these joke cults and joke populations, this puts women in physical danger whenever they wander too close to the jungle, unaware of the monkey madness risk.

There's just such a blatant skill and mentality difference between the genuine anti sex slavery/anti paedophilia speculatores/delatores counter-nonce guys you find on the right and ... the confused and pathetic mess you find on the left when it comes to the tates. With the former you get this strong sense of "I don't fucking care if it's legal I want them destroyed" as in, they have decided it's wrong, and if the world says it's legal, they will attack the world. The left however struggle to pretend that they care while desperately trying to find some kind of legal loophole to lynch them with, oblivious to the fact you never needed broken rules to begin with if you truly cared (which you don't).
Ok so you are outraged over the 14 year old there, but not the 15 year olds the Tates targeted. Make it make sense.

Or is it just as simple as you quite like the Tates, wish people wouldn't scrutinse their crimes, so point to some vague matrix of worse crimes?
 
Back