- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
they do not like this and are building to get you to pay a nominal fee to view their dirty picturesimages I download
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
they do not like this and are building to get you to pay a nominal fee to view their dirty picturesimages I download
Apparently it is compresses to a smaller size than JPEG (when lossy) or PNG (when lossless). The difference is supposed to be around 25% - which is a lot for companies like google that have a shitton of images on their servers.I’d love to know why images on the modern web are being converted from JPEG to WebP. Over half the images I download are WebP and I have to convert them back to JPEG or PNG to even be able to functionally view/use them. Such a goddamn pain in the ass.
I’d love to know why images on the modern web are being converted from JPEG to WebP. Over half the images I download are WebP and I have to convert them back to JPEG or PNG to even be able to functionally view/use them. Such a goddamn pain in the ass.
Google’s whole C-suite should be hanged for dropping support for the superior JPEG XL (.jxl) in Chrome in favor of their proprietary WebP (.webp) - all while parading around with their so-called green initiatives, yet killing off the one format that could’ve slashed global bandwidth, storage, and energy use, and done it with better quality. Sustainability scam my ass.Apparently it is compresses to a smaller size than JPEG (when lossy) or PNG (when lossless).
This can quite literally be applied to every single "sustainable" initiative out there. LED bulbs, 'smart' devices, electric cars, etc. It's all a lie when you take a look at the larger picture rather than the cherry picked datapoints companies use to make you consoom their new product.Sustainability scam my ass
I really do miss the FLIF image format, imagine animated GIFs, accurate PNGs and lossy JPGs all in one format. They did use the FLIF tech for JXL but JXL doesn't support animation.Google’s whole C-suite should be hanged for dropping support for the superior JPEG XL (.jxl)
Too bad nobody will face accountability for it either. Just like all the government fraud and waste that has been going on for decades.Green Enegry/Sustainability is going to be remembered as the biggest con in human history. Just another example of too big to fail companies colluding with the government to FUCK you and I over.
Sidenote: Most people don't know that reduce and reuse comes before recycle.
Google ranks sites higher for using WebP. That WebP is a Google format is a coincidence, move along.I’d love to know why images on the modern web are being converted from JPEG to WebP. Over half the images I download are WebP and I have to convert them back to JPEG or PNG to even be able to functionally view/use them. Such a goddamn pain in the ass.
Tell me about it. Recycling is the consumer's palliative.Sidenote: Most people don't know that reduce and reuse comes before recycle.
I am convinced this shit is astroturfed as fuck. I see it pushed everywhere, even though the site still requires javascript to do anything.I just learned about the McMaster-Carr website.
God, if it's astroturfed and there's even better sites out there that makes the comparison worse! Even a less-than-perfect site mogs the entire mainstream web, so imagine how much better a hypothetical ideal website would be!I am convinced this shit is astroturfed as fuck. I see it pushed everywhere, even though the site still requires javascript to do anything.
View attachment 7126153
They also reward you with higher search results if your site uses infinite scroll instead of pages. And will basically threaten to de-list your site if you don't have a mobile version. Meaning your site gets buried at the bottom even on a desktop search if you don't have mobile support.Google ranks sites higher for using WebP. That WebP is a Google format is a coincidence, move along.
they do not like this and are building to get you to pay a nominal fee to view their dirty pictures
Maybe I've gotten use to this, or just find the way to scrap things I want anyways. But -Modern Internet really doesn't want you downloading anything.
What angers me more now, is how everything is relative. This post is from 2 days ago. This video is from 4 years ago. Cool - can you just give me an actual date? I'm big a boy - can read a calendar you know!For modern web woes, it's the fact that few places (from blogs to sites of actual organizations) have a usable sitemap to direct you to the rest of the site or the archives.
Sometimes they graciously allow you to glance at the actual timestamp when you hover over it. I can't find the site for the life of me, but I swear I've seen "posted a decade ago" before. Because fuck you, year resolution is still clearly too fine-grained.What angers me more now, is how everything is relative. This post is from 2 days ago. This video is from 4 years ago. Cool - can you just give me an actual date? I'm big a boy - can read a calendar you know!
It's not a dating program, but Soulseekqt has a load of stuff and is my go to for music.Which sites do you use for your music torrents? I may just try that and getting a microSD card to hold all the downloads.
I miss when people were allowed to civilly disagree with each other without some kill team of trannyjannies swooping in to kill any discussion.
Now its all about controlling narratives to an insane degree to where online discourse is all but dead and all they care about is e-begging and giving nothing but lipservice about community. Really puts into perspective just how out of control astroturfing and marketing firms are today.
It's even more irritating when the URL says it's not WEBP, but it downloads as WEBP.I’d love to know why images on the modern web are being converted from JPEG to WebP.