Opinion As a Girl Mom, I’m Glad the New ‘Snow White’ Exists (Despite All Its Flaws)

Link (Archive)

As a Girl Mom, I’m Glad the New ‘Snow White’ Exists (Despite All Its Flaws)​

I’m a huge Sondheim fan, so I waited basically my entire life to introduce my daughter to my favorite childhood play, Into the Woods. But as we sat down to watch (in this case the Disney version, though my heart will always lie with Bernadette Peters), I had a stunning realization: she had no familiarity with the source material. Cinderella? Never heard of her. Rapunzel? Lived in a what with no stairs now? Little Red Riding Hood? Was she the one who slept in Papa Bear’s bed?

The reason my 8-year-old had such a gaping blind spot was entirely my own doing: I had never read her these books or shown her these movies because the plots are overwhelmingly sexist, predatory and otherwise problematic. Sleeping Beauty getting nonconsensually kissed while she’s drugged? No, thank you. I was caught between a rock and a hard place: I didn’t want to teach my daughter that you need a prince to come and save you, but I also didn’t want her going into the world thinking Rumpelstiltskin was a wrinkle releaser.

Enter Snow White, Disney’s most recent attempt to correct and newly monetize the original IP.

Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you know the new live action film, starring Rachel Zegler and Gal Gadot, is steeped in controversy, from accusations of being “too woke,” to criticisms of its handling of the dwarfs, who are now creepy CGI gnomes with beads of sweat glistening on their bulbous noses. The drama has been embarrassing (with the top stars reportedly snubbing each other) and the reviews have been middling. But I recently took my daughter to see it…and I’m not mad I did.

Is Snow White a great film? Absolutely not. The new songs are forgettable, the added characters are confusing and Gal Gadot is borderline terrible in the role of the evil queen. But it’s serviceable. And more to the point, it eliminates the most egregiously offensive plot points while still retaining the heart of the original Snow White.

For starters, Zegler’s White is no longer named for having “skin as white as snow.” Instead, she’s named after the winter storm in which she was born. Additionally, we’ve now done away with the young-girl-as-domestic-servant-for-a-bunch-of-old-men subplot; Snow White does encourage the dwarfs to clean (whistling while they work), but she doesn’t do all the sweeping and dusting for them. Finally, the love interest is no longer a prince come to save Snow White, but a Robinhood-type revolutionary who works, alongside her, to take back the kingdom from the grip of tyranny. The song “Some Day My Prince Will Come” has been, appropriately, excised.

In short, we lose the sexism and racism (if not entirely the dwarfism), but retain the romance, magic and beauty-inside-is-more-important-than-beauty-outside lesson.

Perhaps I’m mostly reacting to the other children’s movies on the horizon. Before Snow White, we saw the coming attraction for The Minecraft Movie, yet another frenetic, laugh-a-minute flick starring Jack Black and based on a video game. My daughter and I looked at each other. “No,” we both mouthed. I’m happy there are still sweet alternatives to that type of kids’ drivel, and I’m glad my daughter can know the basics of a fairytale in a way that empowers her to save herself. To me, that feels like happily ever after.
 
Last edited:
How do you grow up without fairy tales? Like, forget about parents, what about the rest of society?
What is the utility of fictional stories? I would rather read historical fiction if I simply have to deviate from dry biographies and memoirs BEEP BEEP BOOP

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to diagram the resulting data from the birthday gangbang #cameinthefluffer
 
It’s a woman with only daughters. Women with only sons do the same thing where they call themselves boy moms.
That's still retarded (never once heard my MIL call herself a "boy mom"), albeit fitting for dumbass moms like this chick.
jillian-quint-editor-in-chief-purewow.jpeg
Some man thought this woman was hot enough to marry.
 
Additionally, we’ve now done away with the young-girl-as-domestic-servant-for-a-bunch-of-old-men subplot; Snow White does encourage the dwarfs to clean (whistling while they work), but she doesn’t do all the sweeping and dusting for them.
"Honey, you don't need to get a job when you grow up to avoid homelessness and starvation. You can just commit home invasion on a bunch of old men and then force them to clean while you do absolutely nothing."

"Also, any woman who chooses to take a job cleaning houses is a worthless slave."
That poor kid is going to be so socially maladjusted.
Hopefully her daughter will rebel against mom by learning to cook, marrying a nice man and then becoming a homemaking mother of seven adoring children.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rusty shackleford 1
Enter Snow White, Disney’s most recent attempt to correct and newly monetize the original IP.
And there it is. It's not about telling a good story, or having a bit of fun and whimsy, no it must be corrected to suit the modern audience's* exceedingly fickle sensibilities. A woman can never be shown in distress, a woman must never be rescued, all characters must capitulate to the whims of the girlboss heroine lest they be deemed sexist and/or racist depending on where she falls on the paper bag test. Heterosexual romance is verboten. Men are useless at best and rapist oppressors at worst. The heroine is always the most desirable woman in the cast, especially if she's way less conventionally attractive than everyone else. She will always be the smartest, she will always be correct, she will never be afraid, she will never lose, and it will be predicatable safe and boring.

*The tubby dangerhairs in HR and on Tumblr demanding a Mary Sue that "represents" them
 
How do you grow up without fairy tales? Like, forget about parents, what about the rest of society?
I don't know if my school was just an outlier doing this or if it was just commonplace back in the 90s, but in kindergarten/1st grade a big part of our reading was reading old fairy tales, along with watching the classic Disney movie versions as well. And it wasn't traumatizing or weird, I found it pretty interesting and in a way was my first experience with horror since a lot of the "real" versions of fairy tales are from late antiquity and deal with demons, imps, witches, etc with Rumpelstiltskin, Faust, Hansel & Gretel. Everyone thought it was cool, we liked the Disney movies and we liked the kinda fucked up fairy tales equally. I'm sure now if a public school teacher tried to teach that they would get in trouble for not following the cookie cutter curriculum handed down by the state or would get complaints from concerned parents though.
 
Snow White does encourage the dwarfs to clean (whistling while they work), but she doesn’t do all the sweeping and dusting for them.
Fuck this. First of all in the original movie Snow white hardly does the cleaning by herself, she has an adorable army of helpful critters (perfect for slapstick humor). So even that doesn't hold water but importantly, it's ment to show Snow white's positive personality traits and what she can do to survive in her new dangerous situation. That's important story telling.

She cleaned the very dirty house because he felt sorry for the children she thought lived there. She did it out kindness of her heart and in hopes that she could show what she could offer in exchange for a place to stay. So she is sweet, hardworking and making opportunities to herself. That's a way better role model than a pushy bitch and I don't even really like OG Snow white.
 
These Disney live-action remakes have no artistic vision. They're made strictly to make money using the safest formula possible. The closest thing the film industry has ever come to paint-by-numbers.

The fact that you're liking these movies because they're deliberately designed to be as bland and inoffensive as possible should be a fairly damning indictment of your artistic tastes, and how little respect you have for your own children's intelligence if you think it's all they're worth feeding.
 
Additionally, we’ve now done away with the young-girl-as-domestic-servant-for-a-bunch-of-old-men subplot; Snow White does encourage the dwarfs to clean (whistling while they work), but she doesn’t do all the sweeping and dusting for them.
Snow White cleans the house because she initially thinks orphan children are living there. Afterwards she and the dwarfs clean up. This author clearly hasn’t watched the original movie for years.
 
Wrong, they’re women or womenchildren. They stop being a girl the moment they get to live through the pain of birth. You know this, calling them girls is infantilizing after passing a cranium.
So mothers who had C-sections for their baby are still called "girls"?
:thinking:
 
What the Fuck is a "Girl Mom" ?

Actually, don't tell me - I don't need this term in my lexicon.
The mother of one or more girl children. The more commonly used variant is 'boy mom'. You can figure that one out.
Anyway as a girl mom this looks like a massive turd and we are not going to see it, we are going to see the Minecraft movie instead.
 
Girl mom and boy mom are interesting concepts because the women that espouse those titles generally believe in girlboss equal everything opportunity power She-ro fantasies, but they acknowledge through the titles themselves that there’s a difference between the sexes. that raising boys and girls will bring different challenges.

Interesting that she doesn’t seem to mention the importance of boy moms watching the film for the girl power equality message. Girls are equal but also to be given special consideration for living their equalness, somehow, in a fantasy where all else is equal.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
I won't be the least bit surprised if it turns out she's more of a 'girl' mom than a 'girl mom'
 
Back