UK Schools to give boys anti-misogyny lessons to stop toxic masculinity in wake of Netflix hit Adolescence

1742736328168.png

Schools are set to give students anti-misogyny lessons in the wake of hit Netflix TV show Adolescence about a teen boy who murders a female classmate.

The classes form part of the government's new relationships, health and sex education (RHSE) guidance, which will be introduced before the end of the academic year.

It comes after Sir Keir Starmer revealed at Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday that he was watching the mini-series with his two teenagers - and that he backs the show creators' calls for it to be shown in parliament and schools.

The four-episode programme follows the Miller family, whose lives are torn apart when their 13-year-old son Jamie is arrested for stabbing a female classmate to death after being influenced by online misogyny.

The drama, released ten days ago, was the most-watched show on Netflix worldwide last weekend, gripping audiences with its sobering portrayal of how social media and misogynistic influencers can impact young boys.

Though Labour's classroom guidance is still being developed, it is understood to include content to 'support healthy relationships', to 'enable schools to tackle harmful behaviour and ensure that misogyny is stamped out and not allowed to proliferate', an insider source said, the Times reported.

From as early as primary school, children will be encouraged to 'express and understand boundaries, handle disappointment and pay attention to the needs and preferences of oneself and others', with content modified for older children to reflect the 'real-life complexities of romantic and sexual relationships', the source added.

The development comes as a win for the Netflix show's co-writers, Jack Thorne and actor Stephen Graham - who stars as the teen boy's father - who have said they wanted Adolescence to be a programme that 'causes discussion and makes change'.

The new guidance will encourage students to 'think about what healthy sexual relationships involve' - including 'consent', along with 'kindness, attention and care'.

As children progress to secondary school, classroom content will start to include the 'communication and ethics' needed for healthy romantic and sexual relationships.

Topics covered will range from dynamics of power and vulnerability, to tools to manage 'difficult emotions', like disappointment and anger, that can affect relationships.

The effects of misogynistic online content and pornography on both young people's sexual behaviour and their views of relationship norms will also be discussed.

Education secretary Bridget Phillipson has faced pressure to overturn RSHE guidance drafted by the previous Conservative government - which included bans on sex education for children under nine and discussions of gender identity.

Adolescence was praised last week by the parents of a survivor of the Southport stabbings for drawing attention to the 'terrifying' impacts of online misogynistic content on young men.

Axel Rudakubana, then 17, stabbed their daughter - known as Child A - more than 30 times during his brutal attack on a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in July last year. He killed three young girls - and was jailed for life in January.

The parents, in a statement read out by their MP during a debate on knife crime in the House of Commons on Thursday, said influencers like Andrew Tate are having a 'terrifying' impact on teen boys, who needed to be protected from this content.

Rudakubana cleared most of his online search history before the murders - so it is not known whether he viewed any content associated with Tate.

Triple murderer Kyle Clifford - who shot his ex-girlfriend Louise Hunt and her sister Hannah with a crossbow and stabbed their mother Carol - is known to have viewed Tate's videos before making his ferocious attacks.

Teachers were told in government guidance released last year to look out for signs of misogyny and 'incel culture' in students aged 14 and over, which could lead to sexual abuse, violence and suicide.

The education secretary warned teachers to watch out for teen boys who had been indoctrinated by 'manosphere' influencers into 'hating women'.

Last week, former England football manager Sir Gareth Southgate blasted 'callous, manipulative and toxic influencers' for leading young men towards misogyny.

At the BBC's annual Richard Dimbleby lecture, he said the 'sole drive' of these pernicious online creators is their 'own gain': 'They willingly trick young men into believing that success is measured by money or dominance, that strength means never showing emotion, and that the world, including women, is against them.'

MailOnline
Archive [March 23 2025]
 
Last edited:
I believe the interests of young men should come before women always, forever and without exception. A man's dignity, self respect and sense of self regard is worth more than the life of every woman who has ever lived.

And yes I know you are a radfem.
@Ishtar loves trannies and 3rd world rape ape scrotes.
 
Just for everyone who doesn't know, radfems otherwise known as radical feminists are a specious breed of hyper online feminists that emulate a great deal of racist rhetoric used by the alt right, a seething resentment against men, and often comical degrees of frustrated bitterness-leading to inane fantasies about "killing all men' and "why FDS makes you a Kween!!"

Take the worst feminist stereotypes, add a dozen dozes of online vitriol, and a clear mirroring of the manosphere, and you get an online movement that has be seen to be believed.

I have studied them(meaning I read them on twitter), and they are about as bad as trannies, sometimes worse depending on the individual.

Seems they found this thread to engage in counter signaling.
 
Where is the lie tho? Teenage boys are inherently evil and they should be more like women (aka not rape and murder people).
What's coming next? Asking them to die on foreign shores for your benefit, especially after you've beaten the capacity for lethal force out of them? Who's going to protect you in case of a disaster? I don't think asking Abdul and Rajeet nicely to participate in WW3 against [insert cleptocratic shithole globohomo deems as the enemy this week] is going to work for you lot.

What I find in particular hilarious, especially from you, is your lust after men who hone the potential for lethality. What do you think hitting the gym accomplishes, inherently?
 
What's coming next? Asking them to die on foreign shores for your benefit, especially after you've beaten the capacity for lethal force out of them? Who's going to protect you in case of a disaster? I don't think asking Abdul and Rajeet nicely to participate in WW3 against [insert cleptocratic shithole globohomo deems as the enemy this week] is going to work for you lot.

What I find in particular hilarious, especially from you, is your lust after men who hone the potential for lethality. What do you think hitting the gym accomplishes, inherently?
She basically would prefer a world where men don't exist or have been mindbroken into being docile beasts of burden(and even that might be too scary). You aren't talking to a generic feminist, you are talking to a super duper feminist that genuinely does hate "all" men.
 
She basically would prefer a world where men don't exist or have been mindbroken into being docile beasts of burden(and even that might be too scary). You aren't talking to a generic feminist, you are talking to a super duper feminist that genuinely does hate "all" men.
That delusion will not make it past the 2150s. Demographics is destiny, also for political ideologies.
 
It's very disheartening to see how public opinion has reduced young men's issues to misogyny alone. What's worse is that they've made enormous faggots like Andrew Tate the heads of the problem. Seriously, i had never even heard of the guy before, and the only times i see his name typed out is through outrage articles like these.

The hatred of women is a symptom, not the cause. But this is what these people focus on. I've said it before, but the reason they will never get the support they want is because they can't even begin to pretend they actually care about males.

"It's okay to be angry, just don't be angry at women and bipoc! It's not their fault you're mediocre!"

Never any talk about depression, about suicide rates, hopelessness about the future, isolation... And on the rare chance any of those are acknowledged, it's prefaced with "First of all, you have to admit that as a man, you are privileged, okay?" Aka "Your problems come second, maybe third."

It doesn't take a genius to see how that approach will push these kids towards the exact opposite of what you represent. It's shocking how they can't see this.
 
She basically would prefer a world where men don't exist or have been mindbroken into being docile beasts of burden(and even that might be too scary). You aren't talking to a generic feminist, you are talking to a super duper feminist that genuinely does hate "all" men.
That's you with the sexes swapped, you fucking weirdo.
 
Sounds good on paper but doesn't work with current state.
Define a women - impossible.

Teach rape apes from 3rd world not to be rape apes from 3rd world.

Atomized white boy sees rape apes having short term success with misogynist strategies. Moids brained soldiers mentality is too afraid to speak up to the leader and fight back when leader is considered stronger or 'the alpha' even if he's an IQ85 illiterate monkey. Men feel entitled and robbed off their sex, lose the temper and don't understand how anti-misogyny can improve their lives, so they will go wild and copy the ape shit from the rape apes.
 
I sort of assumed the point of that show was demonstrating how the breakdown of society is failing our children. Yes, it makes an observation about the manosphere, but it also touches on things like social media bullying, parents not parenting their children, schools having gone to shit, some teachers just being there for the paycheck and not caring about their students, other teachers just yelling at kids (because the kids are feral), the other teachers being caring but unable to control their students or are loving mumsy types that the boys don't respect etc etc.

I'm still finishing it so I don't know the denoument. But while Andrew Tate is namechecked, that's only one tiny aspect that's mostly brought up to explain why he was getting bullied for being an incel. If you watch this show and think "if only Andrew Tate didn't make videos", you've missed the point. The issue isn't how we convince kids who watch Andrew Tate that he's wrong, the issue is why are they turning to Andrew Tate in the first place? Failing to address that and hectoring them is only going to make them more into the manosphere

That's before unpacking the number of kids whose parents come from highly misogynistic cultures and are actively embedding those values into their children.
SPOILER: There is no fucking denoument, it just kinda peters out, making the time you spent watching it a total fucking waste.
 
I'm quite amazed, maybe it is a cultural thing and I don't pick up on the nuances but where is the threshold for this countries citizens to actually start going French Revolution? I'm starting to think they have no threshold.
The British modus vivendi is to always do the opposite of whatever the French would do
 
Back