US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The tone of this thread seems much more negative than last I checked. How's that Lindsey Graham endorsement going by the way?


Shit has never looked more dire for the right. Democrats are about to make the comeback of a lifetime in 2026 and the GOP will blame everyone but themselves.


This is why non-Marxist thought will never succeed by the way. Say what you will about the left, at least they're proactive and actually give a shit about their cause.
Phew, was worried for a second there.
 
New U.S. Department of Homeland Security report finds that tens of housands of unaccompanied minors have gone completely unaccounted for during the Biden admin.

Between 2019-2023, over 31,000 unaccompanied minors were released to addresses that were blank, undeliverable, or missing apartment numbers.

Additionally, more than 43,000 of them failed to appear for scheduled court dates.

View attachment 7144099

The report is archived as an attachment to this post.
We've known this for a while now.

 
The Colorado Legislature passed a law that would require the state to add an option for “nonbinary” and “transgender” on death certificates.

"It is important that their memory, their identity continues to be affirmed in death as it was in life," Democratic Representative Kyle Brown

1.png

The law in particular is House Bill 25-1109.

Archive in attachments.
 

Attachments

Wanted to go check on reddit, see if they were crying about the white house anime and I just havent checked on them in a while
1743103422583.png
Im not even sure THEY know what they are trying to say with this one, poor guys have lost the plot badly
This is projection of the highest level. They're trying to say, "the Right's opinions are completely dictated by whatever Trump says."
That's pretty rich from them, given the absolute clusterfuck that was their messaging when shifting from Biden to Harris in the election. Going from "Joe Biden is my only candidate" to "yaaas queen slay" in less than 24-hours will never not be hilarious.
 
Hmmmmmmm some news it starting to leak out of DC

You know that Non-Profit group American Oversight. The ones who claim to be fighting for transparency and oversight in Washington, the ones pushing FOIA's on every Trump department and DODGE? The ones who are funding all these lawsuits against Trump all over the US? Who are paying for $500/hr lawyers for gangbangers and drug dealers so they can be brought back to the US?

Well surprise surprise the directors of AO have been linked to the DNC and it turns out 90% of their funding is coming from Democratic "donors" to the tune of 8 million dollars in the last 5 days.

Hmmmmm

oh wait there's more!

Judge Boasberg is a familiar face at AO being invited to give "talks" paid for of course about "American Judiciary Policy in DC". How often and how much was he paid? Well I'm afraid that confidential friend. You want a FOIA? Oh sorry we don't respond to FOIA's as we are not a government agency! These "talks" are purely internal training and thus not open to the public nor will we disclose any details about who attends.

Sorry friendo! You will just have to live in uncertainty. It's not a crime to invited judges to give speeches and pay them now is it?

Why are all our directors members of DC law firms who work for Democratic NGO's and members of the Democrat Party? Well there is no law against that is there? People are free to work and donate to whomever they like here in America. Just because we have tonnes of members spread thought the whole DC judiciary doesn't mean anything at all.

Mighty sus....might mighty sus.

Hell this stinks of Washington insiders doing a silent coupe by lawfaring everything Trump does to death and getting paid very very well to do it. The CEO of AO gets 300K a year plus she employed by the largest DC law firm as a full partner. Mighty nice gig if you can get it.

I hope Senator Cruz keeps digging and actually does something for once in his life.
 
This is why non-Marxist thought will never succeed by the way. Say what you will about the left, at least they're proactive and actually give a shit about their cause.
It's too bad the only thing the left in general is good at is self immolation, purity testing and political / social Halal. Otherwise they might be useful for something.

Hmmmmmmm some news it starting to leak out of DC

You know that Non-Profit group American Oversight. The ones who claim to be fighting for transparency and oversight in Washington, the ones pushing FOIA's on every Trump department and DODGE? The ones who are funding all these lawsuits against Trump all over the US? Who are paying for $500/hr lawyers for gangbangers and drug dealers so they can be brought back to the US?

Well surprise surprise the directors of AO have been linked to the DNC and it turns out 90% of their funding is coming from Democratic "donors" to the tune of 8 million dollars in the last 5 days.

Hmmmmm

oh wait there's more!

Judge Boasberg is a familiar face at AO being invited to give "talks" paid for of course about "American Judiciary Policy in DC". How often and how much was he paid? Well I'm afraid that confidential friend. You want a FOIA? Oh sorry we don't respond to FOIA's as we are not a government agency! These "talks" are purely internal training and thus not open to the public nor will we disclose any details about who attends.

Sorry friendo! You will just have to live in uncertainty. It's not a crime to invited judges to give speeches and pay them now is it?

Why are all our directors members of DC law firms who work for Democratic NGO's and members of the Democrat Party? Well there is no law against that is there? People are free to work and donate to whomever they like here in America. Just because we have tonnes of members spread thought the whole DC judiciary doesn't mean anything at all.

Mighty sus....might mighty sus.

Hell this stinks of Washington insiders doing a silent coupe by lawfaring everything Trump does to death and getting paid very very well to do it. The CEO of AO gets 300K a year plus she employed by the largest DC law firm as a full partner. Mighty nice gig if you can get it.

I hope Senator Cruz keeps digging and actually does something for once in his life.

Nigga you got anything to back this up other than some random ass Xitter posts?
 
Hmmmmmmm some news it starting to leak out of DC

You know that Non-Profit group American Oversight. The ones who claim to be fighting for transparency and oversight in Washington, the ones pushing FOIA's on every Trump department and DODGE? The ones who are funding all these lawsuits against Trump all over the US? Who are paying for $500/hr lawyers for gangbangers and drug dealers so they can be brought back to the US?

Well surprise surprise the directors of AO have been linked to the DNC and it turns out 90% of their funding is coming from Democratic "donors" to the tune of 8 million dollars in the last 5 days.

Hmmmmm

oh wait there's more!

Judge Boasberg is a familiar face at AO being invited to give "talks" paid for of course about "American Judiciary Policy in DC". How often and how much was he paid? Well I'm afraid that confidential friend. You want a FOIA? Oh sorry we don't respond to FOIA's as we are not a government agency! These "talks" are purely internal training and thus not open to the public nor will we disclose any details about who attends.

Sorry friendo! You will just have to live in uncertainty. It's not a crime to invited judges to give speeches and pay them now is it?

Why are all our directors members of DC law firms who work for Democratic NGO's and members of the Democrat Party? Well there is no law against that is there? People are free to work and donate to whomever they like here in America. Just because we have tonnes of members spread thought the whole DC judiciary doesn't mean anything at all.

Mighty sus....might mighty sus.

Hell this stinks of Washington insiders doing a silent coupe by lawfaring everything Trump does to death and getting paid very very well to do it. The CEO of AO gets 300K a year plus she employed by the largest DC law firm as a full partner. Mighty nice gig if you can get it.

I hope Senator Cruz keeps digging and actually does something for once in his life.
DC is hella incestuous. Its a big party and you ain't in it.
 
I just LOVE seeing my tax dollars pissed away on idiocy.

Still better than paying for 5-star hotels for "migrants", though.

Fuck Canada, Free Alberta NOW!!!
Hang in there! This might be the start of your best chance to shake off a lot of the bullshit you've endured for the past decade.

The people in those red states are just going to roll their eyes anyway. Gas prices are down too so it makes no fucking sense in the first place.
 
Trump lost his appeal in DC for the Judge Boasberg case vs Gangersters

Judge Boasberg issued a order that all deported people must be returned and each and everyone be given a separate chance to appeal their deportation as Trump doesn't have the power to just do mass deportations.

Of course the DC court of appeals found no grounds and that Boasberg is 100% in the right here (shock and surprise!!) so off it goes to the SCOTUS for a final ruling.,

Will Roberts and ACB cuck? Probably. I bet they will find and excuse to rule in the gangsters favor on some obscure legal grounds. Roberts would see America filled to the brim with criminals and drug dealers then have the power of the judiciary diminished in any way.

Imagine ruling that you have to re-import illegal aliens back into your country then give then room and board until you have processed them "properly" and gotten the courts permission to deport them again.

Fuck these Dem judges, fuck them with a rusty stick.
Judges exist to justly interpret governance with the consent of the governed. I don't think they're aware of or would like how close we are to that consent fading.
 
@CaliforniaRaisin

bitch if I had anything more I would put it out there. It's all just insider talk at the moment and Cruz said he was going to investigate it.

The real issue is that cunt of a lawyer is right, AO is doing nothing illegal at all and that's the truth.

And that's the crux of the issue, these fuckers can conspire all they want and it is legal. You can pay a judge to come talk at your event. You can have members in the DC courts and you can issue lawsuits anytime you have grounds.

That the piss off, these cunts are just using the system as intended, they're just trying to subvert the US Federal Executive that's all.

No biggie right?
 
Some news regarding synthetic food dye in the United States.

States move to ban or restrict use of synthetic dyes used in candies and cereal​

Synthetic dyes used to make brightly colored cereals, drinks and candies are coming under scrutiny in states across the country, where lawmakers say the federal government has stalled in taking action despite evidence of harmful effects.

West Virginia, which ranks at the bottom in the U.S. for many health metrics, became the first to sign a sweeping statewide ban on seven such dyes this week. Lawmakers in more than 20 states — from deep red West Virginia to heavily Democratic California — are making a bipartisan push to restrict access to the dyes, which have been tied to neurobehavioral problems in some children and of which U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been an outspoken critic.

“We should not be forced to police our own foods,” said Republican Sen. Laura Wakim Chapman, who heads the Senate’s health committee and told lawmakers the vote might be the most important of their political careers. “No more toxic colors, no more poisoning ourselves and our children. No more unnecessary risks. Our health is not for sale.”

In signing the bill, Republican Gov. Patrick Morrisey referenced Kennedy’s slogan in saying, “There’s no better place to lead the Make America Healthy Again mission.”

The prohibition on certain preservatives and red, blue, green and yellow dyes takes effect for school food in August, and across the state in 2028. It follows narrower bills approved in California last year and Virginia last week that would ban six artificial dyes from being served in public schools beginning in 2027

Why do lawmakers want to see the dyes die?​

Thirty-six color additives are approved by the Federal Drug Administration for use in food and drinks in the U.S. Nine petroleum-based chemical dyes, including Red 3, have been allowed in U.S. food.

Public health advocates have been lobbying for state and federal action for years, pointing to research that links food dyes and other chemical additives to health risks, including exacerbating symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in some children and animal research linking certain additives to cancers.

The European Union and some countries, including Australia and Japan, have banned or restricted the use of certain food dyes because of potential health risks.

In October, dozens of protesters outside the Michigan headquarters of WK Kellogg Co. demanded that the company remove artificial dyes from cereals such as Apple Jacks and Froot Loops. Kellogg announced that it would remove artificial colors and ingredients from its U.S. products by 2018, but never did so, despite making the change in other countries, such as Canada, where Froot Loops are colored with concentrated carrot juice, watermelon juice and blueberry juice.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration banned Red 3 from the nation’s food supply in January, setting a 2027 deadline for manufacturers to eliminate it from their products. Makers of ingested drugs like cough syrups have until January 2028.

Food industry warns of cost increases​

The National Confectioners Association, a trade group for chocolate, candy, gum and mints sellers, said the new regulations will make food more expensive, less accessible and lead to less variety on grocery store shelves. It said states such as West Virginia, where 1 in 4 children live in poverty and many neighborhoods are “food deserts” with limited access to affordable, nutritious food, will be disproportionately impacted.

Charles Leftwich, vice president of food safety and quality assurance for Sysco Corp., the world’s largest food service distributor, said food safety policies should be supported by science and “be consistently applied across all geographies.”

“We shouldn’t have a fragmented approach when it comes to food safety, because it breeds a lack of trust and confidence with within consumers,” Leftwich said in an interview with The Associated Press.

Changes underway​

School districts in West Virginia have begun phasing out breakfast cereals, strawberry milk or other products in anticipation of the new law’s August deadline.
Chris Derico, who runs Harrison County’s school nutrition program, expects the new regulation to increase costs but said he’s not “in panic mode about it” because none of the products containing the artificial dyes are used in main dishes served to students.

Travis Austin, who leads food service in the Cabell County Schools system, called the policy “a step in the right direction” and said it will be up to manufacturers to rework their formulas to remain competitive.

“It’s all about money,” he said. “If Froot Loops and Lucky Charms aren’t going to change their formulations, then we’re not going to buy them. We’ll buy ones that do.”

Lawmakers in West Virginia, which leads the nation in chronic diseases such as obesity, noted that the dyes are often found in sugary foods.

When the bill passed the state Senate, sponsor Jason Barrett said West Virginia was the first state to approve such a sweeping law but won’t be the last. He cited a bill advancing in Oklahoma that would ban 21 synthetic food dyes and additives.

He said companies prey on low-income consumers and children.

“With passage of this bill, we are saying to big food corporations that the health of our people comes first,” he said.
 
Back