US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Colorado Legislature passed a law that would require the state to add an option for “nonbinary” and “transgender” on death certificates.

"It is important that their memory, their identity continues to be affirmed in death as it was in life," Democratic Representative Kyle Brown

View attachment 7144193

The law in particular is House Bill 25-1109.

Archive in attachments.
Doesn't that still just say "This person is a fucking tranny" just explicitly now?
 
Bluegrass rabbi is a rabbi in Kentucky that is on the human rights board and has attempted to meet with Massie to discuss state bills that would affect his constituents. Massie denied the meeting and accused the rabbi of being a foreign agent. A few months later, the rabbi was in DC and came across Massie. When he tried to speak to Massie, Massie fled and hit the perfect virgin pose.
Why should Massie meet with him?

He's not a constituent (as he lives in Lexington, which is not in Massie's district) and he is obviously hunting for a statement that he can take out of context to attack Massie.

1743121300410.png
 
It goes back to the idea that if the system can't guarantee people decent jobs that they can afford to live on, own a home, support a family, what's the point in supporting the system?

No system can guarantee that. You can't force people to pay for someone else's survival if the work that they do isn't valuable enough. Not every job is going to allow an individual to buy a house and support a family and not every individual is capable enough to work a job that can. No one expects that the cognitively impaired person bagging groceries to do that though, and no one faults that person for being unable to do much more. Entry level jobs are there for people who are gaining experience on how to hold down a job, work with other people, and develop other life skills that they'll need throughout life in their future careers. Yes there are some burnouts who get stuck their for their entire lives, but the vast majority of people who work those positions move up out of them.

It just doesn't sit right with me, there should be a push for workers to be paid what they're owed and worth instead of the continuing exploitation that the US loves because god forbid we talk about class.

Feel free to start a business and pay all of those people what they're owed and worth. No doubt you'll have many people lining up to work for you with such promises, but I think you'll quickly realize that some of them are getting perhaps more than that or aren't worth terribly much. The truth is that US has some of the greatest economic mobility on the planet which is why so many immigrants want to come here. They might not be able to move into the "old money" circles that some useless twats swim in, but they can still become millionaires and have a greater deal of prosperity than would have even been possible for them back in their home countries. The system gives you the opportunity to succeed on your own merits and to be a winner, but that doesn't mean everyone will get there. Some people are losers, have loser mentalities, or find any number of other ways to fuck it up for themselves.
 
‘Hate speech is everywhere on X.’ California Assembly Democrats leave Elon Musk’s platform en masse
Los Angeles Times (archive.ph)
By Laura J. Nelson
2025-03-27 22:28:30GMT
At the urging of Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas (D-Hollister), most of the Democrats in the California Assembly are leaving the social media platform of billionaire Elon Musk, a loyalist of President Trump.

Rivas said Thursday that 58 of the Assembly’s 60 Democrats will stop, or have already stopped, sharing information and interacting with constituents through their official government accounts on X, formerly known as Twitter.

Rivas said the exodus was driven by concerns over the company’s failure to address a surge of misinformation, fake accounts, and racist, sexist and antisemitic posts.

“Hate speech is everywhere on X, the company has no accountability, and the flood of misinformation from fake accounts is just that — fake,” Rivas said in a statement. “I don’t think taxpayer resources should go to X.”

Rivas’ office characterized the exodus as one of the single largest departures of elected officials from X.

The Democrats’ decision follows Musk’s embrace of Trump and recent work to gut the federal workforce through his Department of Government Efficiency.

Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher of Yuba City said in an interview that Democrats were making a mistake by backing away from an “important part of the public square.”

Democrats have criticized Republican members of Congress for not holding in-person town halls, which have become forums for venting against Musk, Trump and cuts to the federal workforce. Leveling that criticism “at the same time that you’re vacating the space where a lot of conversations are happening — I think that’s a bit hypocritical,” Gallagher said.

When Democrats complain about misinformation and hate speech, Gallagher said, they often mean that “they don’t like the opinions that are being expressed.” Where there is hate speech on X, he said, “I think it gets called out.”

A Rivas spokesman said the departure was not a retreat from disagreement, but rather a decision to stop supporting a platform “overtaken by harmful disinformation, hate speech, antisemitism and racism, and that’s run by someone who is promoting this hateful rhetoric.”

His office said Democrats will continue to share information on other social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn and TikTok.

“Democracy depends on impartial information, not the shifting whims of one billionaire,” Rivas said.

Assembly Majority Leader Cecilia Aguiar-Curry (D-Winters), Rivas’ top lieutenant, said Musk is not investing in content moderation, leading to “rampant misinformation” that “endangers our friends and neighbors during emergencies.”

“It is irresponsible to continue to encourage our constituents to seek reliable public safety info on X,” Aguiar-Curry said.

Assemblymember Marc Berman (D-Menlo Park) left X more than a year ago. He said at the time that he took a short break after Musk reactivated the account of Sandy Hook conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, then discovered that he didn’t miss the platform “at all.”

Assemblymember Tina McKinnor (D-Hawthorne) told her followers in a video in February that she was leaving the platform because it had grown “very hateful, very mean” and was rife with misinformation.

In California’s other chamber, state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) left X last month, citing “escalating negative changes,” including an uptick in extremist content, spam posts and “bizarre changes to the algorithm,” which he said had affected engagement with posts about his work. San Diego-area Sen. Akilah Weber Pierson (D-La Mesa) left X in December.

California’s lawmakers are not deleting their accounts, so their old posts will remain available.

Rivas’ office said that’s due in part to prevent people from impersonating elected officials: If a user deletes their X account, the username can be claimed by someone else 30 days later.
 
What the fuck is this? What is this gay "warning" you see on the forum?
It shows up when an ignored user is quoted. If not quoted it doesn't show anything and it doesn't clog the thread with his posts every 3-4 minutes like when I set him to ignore.

It's what the weak people who use the "ignore user" feature see, instead of a triggering pfp, and words on a screen.
But this is also right lmao

I really only use it to de-clutter threads I like reading.
 
What exactly is the Signal Lawsuit?
Transparency nonprofit American Oversight filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday afternoon in Washington, D.C., alleging that the use of Signal violates the federal law that governs the preservation of government records, asking a federal judge to order the cabinet members to preserve the messages.
 
hahahaha

"Judge Boasberg's office confirms that the case was assigned to him randomly"

yah right that's something completely believable right that is.

You know what? Good, show off the corruption of the judiciary, be as blatant and ego driven as you can Dems let the hubris flow because the plebs will never do anything right? In the end your hubris will only make it easier to root out your agents and and burn the corrupted parts to the ground.
 
Transparency nonprofit American Oversight filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday afternoon in Washington, D.C., alleging that the use of Signal violates the federal law that governs the preservation of government records, asking a federal judge to order the cabinet members to preserve the messages.
As opposed to the shit Hunter and his dad pulled? They do know what Signal actually does, right?
 
Back