US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Between Quebec and Haiti, why is it impossible for France to ever run a successful colony?
The French aren't entirely retarded when it comes to colonies, but the French are genetically contrarian, they just cannot do anything anyone else does, they have to do things their own way. This is usually stupid, but it's how they operate. Like having a military service rifle that fires three round bursts and giving it a 25-round magazine. I'm pretty sure it's genetic and cultural.

Anyways, funny you should mention colonies, because they still have one in North America.
 
I'm not entirely sure. I know that Canadian provinces actually have different conditions if they want to join, so it may be easier for them. It's why we can't divide California into saner blocks, like cutting off the insane coastal counties, and why Greater Idaho won't happen, those do need a 2/3s majority to approve it.

For the record the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that a province that wishes to leave the Federation must have a "clear majority" in a plebiscite done under certain rules.

Now you might ask why in the blue hell would a Court made up of 90% Liberal appointee's ever make a rule for a province to leave?

Well the kicker is the statement "a clear majority" which they left to the Federal Government to define and guess what the Federal government has failed to do for 30 years? Is a "clear majority" 50%? 55% 60%? More? 75% maybe? Well we don't know and won't know until it actually happens and the drones in the House are forced to come up with a number. My guess would be in the 75% range but the Court said "clear majority" so maybe 90% have to agree?

Like always the Court serves the Federal government in every way possible. Like when Trudeau suspended Parliament for no reason but to protect his Party what did the SC say? Why nothing of course! They deliberated on it until Trudeau told them he was going to restart the Government then they ruled it as moot. How about when Trudeau used the War Measures act to attack some citizens protesting his government? Nope, not a peep! Much much later on they issued a "he probably shouldn't have done that" ruling that carried no weight what so ever.

I bet Trump would give his golden toilet for a SCOTUS that licks his taint like the Canadian SC lick the Liberals. When a judge is appointed he is a slavish toady for life and would never dare even dream of ruling in a way his boss wouldn't want.

Yet another reason Canada isn't a real country.

Here's a link incase anyone cares about Canada's Civic Law Dumb Ass Canadian Laws no one takes seriously
 
They kinda have a case.

They're suing for a TRO (of course) to "prevent the deletion of any governmental related records contained within these apps" and using the FOIA and their pet Judge to get it.

Edit: sorry for those not in the know a TRO is a temporary restraining order and is critical to the Dems plans because it is non-appealable meaning the pet judge can order what he wants and it takes effect immediately and there isn't Jack shit you can do to challenge it.

My opinion would be that AO will then want these messages handed over to them via a FOIA so they can scour them for anything useful to the Democrats before accidentally leaking them to friendly press just like that rat bastard Jew did. Pretty straight forward IMHO.

American Oversight is nothing more then another DNC funded arm of the party being used to tie up Trump's hands with as much lawfare as possible. As the election cost the Dem's all their institutional power they have to resort to other ways to slow the Rape Train until they can get their shit together.

Rich Democrats are pumping millions into NGO's like AO in a desperate attempt at damage control that's all this is unless you believe that those gangbangers in El Salvador can suddenly afford Washington DC based lawyers that cost $500 bucks an hour.
Is it even possible to stop NGOs at all? Can you force them to be non-partisan? I'm not trying to doom. I'm asking legit questions.
 
work needs to be grueling and miserable and dehumanizing so some boomer retard can afford a second condo to rent out and that's just how the system has to work.
I also hate how American work is grueling and miserable from the getgo. We are Americans, let some other slave in a shithole do the work. The citizen should be getting easier jobs, not harder ones as we advance our technology.
Probably ⏰ but Bondi has pretty much said the whole Signal nonsense is done and dusted, regardless of what Judge Jewenstein says.
The Signal crap blew over in 2 days. I'll never understand why Anthony Weiner or Al Franken didn't stick around.
The media is like a cat chasing a laser.
 
Is it even possible to stop NGOs at all? Can you force them to be non-partisan? I'm not trying to doom. I'm asking legit questions.

I don't think so.

A NGO is a private organization so it's not governed by the same laws that cover a government agency or body. In fact that's why they were created in the first place. To get around those pesky rules that a Government Agency has to obey so they can do the dirty stuff their founders wants. Now there are not only Lefty NGO's but they do seem to be a lot more common and far more active in politics then the Right leaning ones.

Legally AO is doing nothing wrong. It's when you look at how they're doing it things get hazy. But again they have some of the best Lefty lawyers in the US working for them so I would say they are 100% legit.

They are pure unfiltered scum and should all be fed into a wood chipper feet first but...legal.
 
I don't think so.

A NGO is a private organization so it's not governed by the same laws that cover a government agency or body. In fact that's why they were created in the first place. To get around those pesky rules that a Government Agency has to obey so they can do the dirty stuff their founders wants. Now there are not only Lefty NGO's but they do seem to be a lot more common and far more active in politics then the Right leaning ones.

Legally AO is doing nothing wrong. It's when you look at how they're doing it things get hazy. But again they have some of the best Lefty lawyers in the US working for them so I would say they are 100% legit.

They are pure unfiltered scum and should all be fed into a wood chipper feet first but...legal.
The only think you can do is expose them for being duplicitous.
 
He's on the state human rights board.


View attachment 7145012
View attachment 7145013
View attachment 7145015
View attachment 7145017

Massie is refusing to meet this rabbi to discuss a bill that affects his constituents.
Who cares, kike? Massie doesn’t owe this obvious bad actor anything no matter how much kvetching and crying about antisemitism he does.

As has been pointed out, he’s not even one of Massie’s constituents. Any “””lobbying””” this faggot does on behalf of Massie’s ACTUAL constituents is nakedly insincere and a means to smear him.

The best thing Massie can do is what he’s already doing: ignore the obvious bad actor and let him piss and moan til his lungs give out.

Fuck “human rights” councils which serve no one but their board members and spiteful mutants.

Fuck insincere political actors whose entire existence is a performative act of faggotry.

Fuck kikes like you who whine endlessly when your stupid ass opinions are not entertained and instead are ignored or outright laughed at.

Once people are wise to the tactics of your people, it becomes obvious how supremely pathetic and cynical those tactics, and in turn the people who created and use them, really are.
 
These little summer jobs and flipping burgers are fine, but it's offloading all the menial grueling slave labor that Mexicans were paid nothing for off to the American youth and reinforced the idea that some jobs just have to be slave labor. The idea that it's okay to have jobs with shit hours, shit pay, no benefits is retarded. I'm not saying teenagers need perfect jobs, but it's creating that expectation that work needs to be grueling and miserable and dehumanizing so some boomer retard can afford a second condo to rent out and that's just how the system has to work. It goes back to the idea that if the system can't guarantee people decent jobs that they can afford to live on, own a home, support a family, what's the point in supporting the system?

It just doesn't sit right with me, there should be a push for workers to be paid what they're owed and worth instead of the continuing exploitation that the US loves because god forbid we talk about class.
Teenage pothead sweeping floors for $15/hr: "gRuElInG"

Shut up already. I don't know what weird alternate reality you dumb faggots think boomers and gen x grew up in, but I assure you, you're wrong. We all started with those jobs because teenagers are too stupid to do much else. Give me a fucking break with this dumb shit.
 
Like having a military service rifle that fires three round bursts and giving it a 25-round magazine
The FAMAS works like that is because when you fire only two bullets, you know that the clip is empty (iirc it makes a distinct clicking sound when this happens.) The real design crime is having it being bullpupped.
 
The Democrats are also not used to their cultural opponents coming from a perspective other than christian conservatism,
exactly, it really should have gone more viral how Tim started using bible quotes as "gotchas" aganist JD in the VP debate and JD just gave the camera the jim face. because democrats really are that out of touch, they genuinely think the GOP is like it was when they where in high school where Reagan and God were the main pillars and they couldn't argue the other issues.

JD ran circles around Tim because of how unprepared Tim was to debate someone who wasn't some Bush-type jesus freak with no knowledge of the details, JD knowing the exact status and bureaucratic name of various government things should have been a 5 alarm bell for the democrats, that haiti shit caught them off guard super hard.
More people need to be talking about this. Watch Rich Baris' show from yesterday. It's bad. GOP are asleep at the wheel and even Scott Presler is on the verge of giving up.
turns out maybe all those people wearing burger suits now were right on the money. thats the problem with the GOP, as Murdoch murdoch pointed out after election day 2016, most GOP retards stop caring once election day finishes, even Trump had his entire team that dominated the RNC disperse once he won the election. the concept of downballot races or doing anything to get people to vote for you just doesn't enter their minds.

I was thinking about this earlier, think about how gay quickly gay rights were normalized in between 1992 and 2020, when the democrats lost the popular vote only once, now think about how the gop lost on every social issue despite winning the popular vote in ever election except 3 between 1952 and 1992. we're currently near the 100 day mark and outside of some symbolic crap about trannies, every single thing has been struck down by the courts and its business as usual in the trump admin. can't even get the epstein files released.
Let me tell you how bad it is in Virginia for the 2025 election.
i'm actually impressed how "purple" the state government is in virginia, the senate has mostly been a 18/22 levels since the early 90s and the house has been blood red, even with all of NOVA voting blue up until trump got in office in 2016, like the fact that democrats never got more than 55 seats out of 100 in the last 30 years is fucking insane. especially with how they've been holding up weed in virginia for years.
 
The FAMAS works like that is because when you fire only two bullets, you know that the clip is empty (iirc it makes a distinct clicking sound when this happens.) The real design crime is having it being bullpupped.
That's fair, but everyone else manages, it's just not good enough for the French. They have to be contrarian, they have to do it their own way, even if that way is dumb. With anything military, pick an era. Machineguns with holes in the magazines, their damned floating hotel warship era, etc. Being too good to eat potatoes and suffering famines. The French are just special. Tumblehome ships, bullpups, at least the FAMAS mostly works, while everyone else is just moving to M-16 or M-18 style rifles. The Richelieu-class battleships with two foreward quad turrets because fuck you, we're French! Design attractive cars? Non, fuck you! Cheese that doesn't smell like feet? Fuck off.

Same with Quebec. Do something that would benefit both Quebec and Anglo-Canadians? No, fuck you.

It's almost quant.
 
New Executive Order to remove woke ideology from the Smithosians:

RESTORING TRUTH AND SANITY TO AMERICAN HISTORY​

Executive Orders
March 27, 2025

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1. Purpose and Policy. Over the past decade, Americans have witnessed a concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history, replacing objective facts with a distorted narrative driven by ideology rather than truth. This revisionist movement seeks to undermine the remarkable achievements of the United States by casting its founding principles and historical milestones in a negative light. Under this historical revision, our Nation’s unparalleled legacy of advancing liberty, individual rights, and human happiness is reconstructed as inherently racist, sexist, oppressive, or otherwise irredeemably flawed. Rather than fostering unity and a deeper understanding of our shared past, the widespread effort to rewrite history deepens societal divides and fosters a sense of national shame, disregarding the progress America has made and the ideals that continue to inspire millions around the globe.

The prior administration advanced this corrosive ideology. At Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania — where our Nation declared that all men are created equal — the prior administration sponsored training by an organization that advocates dismantling “Western foundations” and “interrogating institutional racism” and pressured National Historical Park rangers that their racial identity should dictate how they convey history to visiting Americans because America is purportedly racist.

Once widely respected as a symbol of American excellence and a global icon of cultural achievement, the Smithsonian Institution has, in recent years, come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology. This shift has promoted narratives that portray American and Western values as inherently harmful and oppressive. For example, the Smithsonian American Art Museum today features “The Shape of Power: Stories of Race and American Sculpture,” an exhibit representing that “[S]ocieties including the United States have used race to establish and maintain systems of power, privilege, and disenfranchisement.” The exhibit further claims that “sculpture has been a powerful tool in promoting scientific racism” and promotes the view that race is not a biological reality but a social construct, stating “Race is a human invention.”

The National Museum of African American History and Culture has proclaimed that “hard work,” “individualism,” and “the nuclear family” are aspects of “White culture.” The forthcoming Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum plans on celebrating the exploits of male athletes participating in women’s sports. These are just a few examples.

It is the policy of my Administration to restore Federal sites dedicated to history, including parks and museums, to solemn and uplifting public monuments that remind Americans of our extraordinary heritage, consistent progress toward becoming a more perfect Union, and unmatched record of advancing liberty, prosperity, and human flourishing. Museums in our Nation’s capital should be places where individuals go to learn — not to be subjected to ideological indoctrination or divisive narratives that distort our shared history.

To advance this policy, we will restore the Smithsonian Institution to its rightful place as a symbol of inspiration and American greatness –- igniting the imagination of young minds, honoring the richness of American history and innovation, and instilling pride in the hearts of all Americans.

Sec. 2. Saving Our Smithsonian. (a) The Vice President, in consultation with the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and the Special Assistant to the President and Senior Associate Staff Secretary, Lindsey Halligan, Esq., shall work to effectuate the policies of this order through his role on the Smithsonian Board of Regents with respect to the Smithsonian Institution and its museums, education and research centers, and the National Zoo, including by seeking to remove improper ideology from such properties, and shall recommend to the President any additional actions necessary to fully effectuate such policies.

(b) The Vice President and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall work with the Congress to ensure that future appropriations to the Smithsonian Institution:

(i) prohibit expenditure on exhibits or programs that degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race, or promote programs or ideologies inconsistent with Federal law and policy; and

(ii) celebrate the achievements of women in the American Women’s History Museum and do not recognize men as women in any respect in the Museum.

(c) The Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the Secretary of the Interior shall take any other measures within their authority to promote the policy of this order.

(d) As appropriate, the Vice President shall, in consultation with the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and Special Assistant to the President and Senior Associate Staff Secretary, Lindsey Halligan, Esq., work with the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Senate Majority Leader, to seek the appointment of citizen members to the Smithsonian Board of Regents committed to advancing the policy of this order.

Sec. 3. Restoring Independence Hall. The Secretary of the Interior shall provide sufficient funding, as available, to improve the infrastructure of Independence National Historical Park, which shall be complete by July 4, 2026, the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.

Sec. 4. Restoring Truth in American History.

(a) The Secretary of the Interior shall:

(i) determine whether, since January 1, 2020, public monuments, memorials, statues, markers, or similar properties within the Department of the Interior’s jurisdiction have been removed or changed to perpetuate a false reconstruction of American history, inappropriately minimize the value of certain historical events or figures, or include any other improper partisan ideology;

(ii) take action to reinstate the pre-existing monuments, memorials, statues, markers, or similar properties, as appropriate and consistent with 43 U.S.C. 1451 et seq., 54 U.S.C. 100101 et seq.,and other applicable law; and

(iii) take action, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to ensure that all public monuments, memorials, statues, markers, or similar properties within the Department of the Interior’s jurisdiction do not contain descriptions, depictions, or other content that inappropriately disparage Americans past or living (including persons living in colonial times), and instead focus on the greatness of the achievements and progress of the American people or, with respect to natural features, the beauty, abundance, and grandeur of the American landscape.

Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,

March 27, 2025.
Source (Archive)
 
I'm not 100% sure, but I think this order gets rid of a bunch of public sector unions:

EXCLUSIONS FROM FEDERAL LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS PROGRAMS​

Executive Orders
March 27, 2025

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including sections 7103(b)(1) of title 5 and 4103(b) of title 22, United States Code, to enhance the national security of the United States, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1. Determinations. (a) The agencies and agency subdivisions set forth in section 2 of this order are hereby determined to have as a primary function intelligence, counterintelligence, investigative, or national security work. It is also hereby determined that Chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code, cannot be applied to these agencies and agency subdivisions in a manner consistent with national security requirements and considerations.

(b) The agency subdivisions set forth in section 3 of this order are hereby determined to have as a primary function intelligence, counterintelligence, investigative, or national security work. It is also hereby determined that Subchapter X of Chapter 52 of title 22, United States Code, cannot be applied to these subdivisions in a manner consistent with national security requirements and considerations.

Sec. 2. Additional National Security Exclusions. Executive Order 12171 of November 19, 1979, as amended, is further amended by:

(a) In section 1-101, adding “and Section 1-4” after “Section 1-2” in both places that term appears.

(b) Adding after section 1-3 a new section 1-4 that reads:

“1-4. Additional Exclusions.

1-401. The Department of State.

1-402. The Department of Defense, except for any subdivisions excluded pursuant to section 4 of the Executive Order of March 27, 2025, entitled ‘Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs.’

1-403. The Department of the Treasury, except the Bureau of Engraving and Printing.

1-404. The Department of Veterans Affairs.

1-405. The Department of Justice.

1-406. Agencies or subdivisions of the Department of Health and Human Services:

(a) Office of the Secretary.

(b) Food and Drug Administration.

(c) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

(d) Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response.

(e) Office of the General Counsel.

(f) Office of Refugee Resettlement, Administration for Children and Families.

(g) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health.

1-407. Agencies or subdivisions of the Department of Homeland Security:

(a) Office of the Secretary.

(b) Office of the General Counsel.

(c) Office of Strategy, Policy, and Plans.

(d) Management Directorate.

(e) Science and Technology Directorate.

(f) Office of Health Security.

(g) Office of Homeland Security Situational Awareness.

(h) U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

(i) United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

(j) United States Coast Guard.

(k) Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

(l) Federal Emergency Management Agency.

1-408. Agencies or subdivisions of the Department of the Interior:

(a) Office of the Secretary.

(b) Bureau of Land Management.

(c) Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement.

(d) Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.

1-409. The Department of Energy, except for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

1-410. The following agencies or subdivisions of the Department of Agriculture:

(a) Food Safety and Inspection Service.

(b) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.

1-411. The International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

1-412. The Environmental Protection Agency.

1-413. The United States Agency for International Development.

1-414. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

1-415. The National Science Foundation.

1-416. The United States International Trade Commission.

1-417. The Federal Communications Commission.

1-418. The General Services Administration.

1-419. The following agencies or subdivisions of each Executive department listed in section 101 of title 5, United States Code, the Social Security Administration, and the Office of Personnel Management:

(a) Office of the Chief Information Officer.

(b) any other agency or subdivision that has information resources management duties as the agency or subdivision’s primary duty.

1-499. Notwithstanding the forgoing, nothing in this section shall exempt from the coverage of Chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code:

(a) the immediate, local employing offices of any agency police officers, security guards, or firefighters, provided that this exclusion does not apply to the Bureau of Prisons;

(b) subdivisions of the United States Marshals Service not listed in section 1-209 of this order; or

(c) any subdivisions of the Departments of Defense or Veterans Affairs for which the applicable Secretary has issued an order suspending the application of this section pursuant to section 4 of the Executive Order of March 27, 2025, entitled ‘Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs.’”

Sec. 3. Foreign Service Exclusions. Executive Order 12171, as amended, is further amended by:

(a) In the first paragraph:

(i) adding “and Section 4103(b) of Title 22,” after “Title 5”; and

(ii) adding “and Subchapter X of Chapter 52 of Title 22” after “Relations Program.”.

(b) Adding after section 1-102 a new section 1-103 that reads:

“1-103. The Department subdivisions set forth in section 1-5 of this order are hereby determined to have as a primary function intelligence, counterintelligence, investigative, or national security work. It is also hereby determined that Subchapter X of Chapter 52 of title 22, United States Code, cannot be applied to those subdivisions in a manner consistent with national security requirements and considerations. The subdivisions set forth in section 1-5 of this order are hereby excluded from coverage under Subchapter X of Chapter 52 of title 22, United States Code.”

(c) Adding after the new section 1-4 added by section 2(b) of this order a new section 1-5 that reads:

“1-5. Subdivisions of Departments Employing Foreign Service Officers.

1-501. Subdivisions of the Department of State:

(a) Each subdivision reporting directly to the Secretary of State.

(b) Each subdivision reporting to the Deputy Secretary of State.

(c) Each subdivision reporting to the Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.

(d) Each subdivision reporting to the Under Secretary for Management.

(e) Each subdivision reporting to the Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security.

(f) Each subdivision reporting to the Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights.

(g) Each subdivision reporting to the Under Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and Environment.

(h) Each subdivision reporting to the Under Secretary for Political Affairs.

(i) Each subdivision reporting to the Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy.

(j) Each United States embassy, consulate, diplomatic mission, or office providing consular services.

1-502. Subdivisions of the United States Agency for International Development:

(a) All Overseas Missions and Field Offices.

(b) Each subdivision reporting directly to the Administrator.

(c) Each subdivision reporting to the Deputy Administrator for Policy and Programming.

(d) Each subdivision reporting to the Deputy Administrator for Management and Resources.”.

Sec. 4. Delegation of Authority to the Secretaries of Defense and Veterans Affairs. (a) Subject to the requirements of subsection (b) of this section, the Secretaries of Defense and Veterans Affairs are delegated authority under 5 U.S.C. 7103(b)(1) to issue orders suspending the application of section 1-402 or 1-404 of Executive Order 12171, as amended, to any subdivisions of the departments they supervise, thereby bringing such subdivisions under the coverage of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.

(b) An order described in subsection (a) of this section shall only be effective if:

(i) the applicable Secretary certifies to the President that the provisions of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute can be applied to such subdivision in a manner consistent with national security requirements and considerations; and

(ii) such certification is submitted for publication in the Federal Register within 15 days of the date of this order.

Sec. 5. Delegation of Authority to the Secretary of Transportation. (a) The national security interests of the United States in ensuring the safety and integrity of the national transportation system require that the Secretary of Transportation have maximum flexibility to cultivate an efficient workforce at the Department of Transportation that is adaptive to new technologies and innovation. Where collective bargaining is incompatible with that mission, the Department of Transportation should not be forced to seek relief through grievances, arbitrations, or administrative proceedings.

(b) The Secretary of Transportation is therefore delegated authority under section 7103(b) of title 5, United States Code, to issue orders excluding any subdivision of the Department of Transportation, including the Federal Aviation Administration, from Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute coverage or suspending any provision of that law with respect to any Department of Transportation installation or activity located outside the 50 States and the District of Columbia. This authority may not be further delegated. When making the determination required by 5 U.S.C. 7103(b)(1) or 7103(b)(2), the Secretary of Transportation shall publish his determination in the Federal Register.

Sec. 6. Implementation. With respect to employees in agencies or subdivisions thereof that were previously part of a bargaining unit but have been excepted under this order, each applicable agency head shall, upon termination of the applicable collective bargaining agreement:

(a) reassign any such employees who performed non-agency business pursuant to section 7131 of title 5 or section 4116 of title 22, United States Code, to performing solely agency business; and

(b) terminate agency participation in any pending grievance proceedings under section 7121 of title 5, United States Code, exceptions to arbitral awards under section 7122 of title 5, United States Code, or unfair labor practice proceedings under section 7118 of title 5 or section 4116 of title 22, United States Code, that involve such employees.

Sec. 7. Additional Review. Within 30 days of the date of this order, the head of each agency with employees covered by Chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code, shall submit a report to the President that identifies any agency subdivisions not covered by Executive Order 12171, as amended:

(a) that have as a primary function intelligence, counterintelligence, investigative, or national security work, applying the definition of “national security” set forth by the Federal Labor Relations Authority in Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Operations, and National Association of Government Employees Local R5-181, 4 FLRA 644 (1980); and

(b) for which the agency head believes the provisions of Chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code, cannot be applied to such subdivision in a manner consistent with national security requirements and considerations, and the reasons therefore.

Sec. 8. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,

March 27, 2025.
Source (Archive)
 
Trump also pardoned Devon Archer, the Biden whistleblower who spoke to Tucker (Part 1, Part 2):

Executive Grant of Clemency for Devon Archer​

Executive Orders
March 26, 2025

TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME, GREETING:

BE IT KNOWN, THAT THIS DAY, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PURSUANT TO MY POWERS UNDER ARTICLE II, SECTION 2, CLAUSE 1, OF THE CONSTITUTION, HAVE GRANTED UNTO THE INDIVIDUAL NAMED BELOW

A FULL AND UNCONDITIONAL PARDON​

For those offenses against the United States individually enumerated and set before me for my consideration and remission of any and all fines, penalties, forfeitures, and restitution ordered by the court:

United States v. Archer, l:16-cr-371
DEVON ARCHER​

I HEREBY DESIGNATE, direct, and empower the Attorney General, as my representative, to immediately sign the grant of clemency to the person named herein. The Attorney General shall declare that her action is the act of the President, being performed at my direction.


IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto signed my name and caused the seal of the Department of Justice to be affixed.


Done at the City of Washington in the District of Columbia this 25th day of March in the year of our Lord Two Thousand Twenty-five and of the Independence of the United States the Two Hundred and Forty-ninth.

DONALD J. TRUMP PRESIDENT
Source (Archive)
 
These little summer jobs and flipping burgers are fine, but it's offloading all the menial grueling slave labor that Mexicans were paid nothing for off to the American youth and reinforced the idea that some jobs just have to be slave labor. The idea that it's okay to have jobs with shit hours, shit pay, no benefits is retarded. I'm not saying teenagers need perfect jobs, but it's creating that expectation that work needs to be grueling and miserable and dehumanizing so some boomer retard can afford a second condo to rent out and that's just how the system has to work. It goes back to the idea that if the system can't guarantee people decent jobs that they can afford to live on, own a home, support a family, what's the point in supporting the system?

It just doesn't sit right with me, there should be a push for workers to be paid what they're owed and worth instead of the continuing exploitation that the US loves because god forbid we talk about class.
Counter point: my little teenage jobs weren’t about the work, but rather let me have agency in the world. I had unlimited energy, but nowhere good to direct it. I had a rough home life.

I learned that I could get along with people I wouldn’t normally meet, and we could get stuff done together. I could get attention and positive reinforcement for showing up on time and trying hard. Smiling and being friendly is a superpower. My efforts would be rewarded with actual money, which let me have nicer clothes and be normal in high school.

While I don’t exactly miss washing dishes or waitressing or whatever else I got paid for, those lessons allowed me to overperform when I got to grownup jobs, and I started ahead of the curve on situational awareness, politics, and just getting shit done with almost no direction. I have had a great life, work-wise.

My negligent, stressed out boomer parents had their own problems and weren’t exactly shuttling me to enriching activities lol. I didn’t have an easy childhood, but I will never regret my crappy jobs.
 
Sounds like you’ve never competed in sports. It feels good to do something that pushes toward a win. Different sports/ activities have different rules as to what is allowed. But even tennis players do a “yes!” when they win a set or a particularly tough point.

I'm admittedly biased when it comes to professional athletes. I don't even know what celebration the original question was referencing. I just dislike overpaid sports niggers in general. I just imagined it was a case of someone flaunting the fact they hit the career lottery and are getting an obscenely high amount of money to play football. My bitterness might be rooted in jealousy towards their wealth, but people getting paid ridiculous amounts of money for shit like this, whether they're in sports or staring in Hollywood slop or grifting politicians or "influencers", is just something I've had to learn to accept as a constant in this world.

Sorry for the derail.
 
Back