Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Useful_Mistake]

Russ filed his motion for sanctions against Mr. Hardin
View attachment 7147324

One problem is that this wasn't served on Mr. Hardin prior. See (from ECF 262):

Without having read the entire motion, it appears facially invalid from the get go

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

Please sanction this man for doing his job (getting in my way).

 

[Kosher Dill]

it appears facially invalid

It has Mobius syndrome?

 

[obsdj]

One problem is that this wasn't served on Mr. Hardin prior. See (from ECF 262)

I was just coming here to screech this. So what is the likely outcome -- will the judge tell the Clerk to strike it since it was improperly filed? Does Hardin need to make a motion (thereby racking up more fees) for it to be stricken? What's the protocol here for people to whom the rules actually apply?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

WELL IT'S ALLL GOOD THEN! Sorry to bother you with things like EVIDENCE

will the judge tell the Clerk to strike it since it was improperly filed? Does Hardin need to make a motion (thereby racking up more fees) for it to be stricken? What's the protocol here for people to whom the rules actually apply?

The Magistrate could order the Clerk to strike it on his own, but really Mr. Hardin will probably have to make a motion out of it.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Russ filed his motion for sanctions against Mr. Hardin

Pack it in boys, it's NEVER BEEN SO OVER!



Oh my God, Russ and I nitpicked on the same thing. We're retards on the same wavelength. It's Joever for me as well.

There are two SPOs listed on the website... The link in the docket text goes to the first one, for cases filed on or after 12-1-2023. But this case was filed back in 2020, which means the older version of the SPO is the one that applies.

Except Russ is being Russtarded, because the link actually did work. And he could have arrived at both SPOs by searching on his own, which he clearly had to do if he claims the court-provided link doesn't work. My helpful picture of Hitler only had the older SPO encoded.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Russell Greer brings up Patrick in court documents and asserts that it's Kiwi Farms swatting Patrick

(the exhibit is just a news story about Patrick getting swatted)

 

[obsdj]

I cannot help but notice that Greer at no point acknowledges in this filing that both the Magistrate AND the District judges have clearly indicated, in so many words, that no violation of the SPO took place. But this fact is inconvenient, so Greer just ignores it as per usual.

 

[TractorGirl]

Isn’t his only witness dead seeing as he removed his brother and father?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

A lesson in why you should have someone look over your legal writing:

Greer says that he should not be "sanctioned over every mistake". Mistake implies an accident - lack of wilful behavior. Let's call that, oh, lets say inadvertent. What does Greer also say? That "inadvertent" actions should nevertheless be subject to sanctions. Well, thank you, Russ for admiting you should be sanctioned.

I cannot help but notice that Greer at no point acknowledges in this filing that both the Magistrate AND the District judges have clearly indicated, in so many words, that no violation of the SPO took place. But this fact is inconvenient, so Greer just ignores it as per usual.

I think this might be in itself sanctionable, and if I remember correctly, Mr. Hardin made a point of it.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Has Greer seen the light? Is he now abandoning his "Defense is posting everything to KF" theory?

 

[But I Digress]

Russ asking for $2,000 so he can drop that money on a night with a whore is next level.

The fact that the judges have repeatedly told him the Protective Order was not violated and he's filing sanction telling them they're wrong is probably going to go very very well.

 

[Welfare Bum]

Hardin should begin patposting in his correspondence with Greer.

"You have been instructed, many thousands of times, to stop saying I violated the SPO. I am not liable for sanctions, child. It is YOU violated who the rules of the court. Enjoy prison."

 

[Magnificent Penis]

1. I didn't read the SPO
2. I assumed I didn't have to do anything
3. Kiwi Farms bad
4. I can't provide any proof of anything because my email sucks :^)
5. no u
6. Please sanction opposing counsel because I am retarded and can't do anything right
I am really looking forward to how the court bends itself over AGAIN to ignore this absolute wealth of retardation and straight up contemptuous behavior. I am dying to see the transcript of how fucking Bennett will cope with having to explain for the third time to this tard that the SPO was not violated and still let him get away with this shit.

 

[Exit fullscreen button]

Russ, in his SPO sperging, reminds of the sweatlord (although in his case it should be droollord) waacfag warhammer players that try to argue what a rule intends to say, rather than what it actually says. what they want to make you believe the rule says is invariably advantageous to them.
I hope that Hardin finally says "enough is enough" and slaps him in the face with a motion so hard, it uninstalls his moebius.exe. Excited for his reply to this.

 

[obsdj]

I think this might be in itself sanctionable, and if I remember correctly, Mr. Hardin made a point of it.

Indeed, in ECF 234 (Hardin's currently-open motion for sanctions that will be addressed in the upcoming Zoom meeting) and 252, Hardin's response to one of Greer's spittle-flecked replies to same.

 

[Hoi Polloi]

I'm predicting at least one more filing from Russ that insists Hardin violated the SPO before the zoom call.

Ding ding ding!



Surely this renders his entire argument moot? He doesn't have a leg to stand on as no matter what he insists, this falls under inadvertent failure to designate. Hardin cannot face any liability for disclosing the information, even after it becomes correctly designated. He's clearly now read the SPO yet seems to only be reading the parts he wants to.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

He's clearly now read the SPO yet seems to only be reading the parts he wants to.

No version of the SPO lists witnesses as "protected" or "confidential", and that by itself makes it all pointless. The motion is also made in violation of the appropriate rules, as Greer has been informed by Mr. Hardin.

 

[Magnificent Penis]

No version of the SPO lists witnesses as "protected" or "confidential", and that by itself makes it all pointless. The motion is also made in violation of the appropriate rules, as Greer has been informed by Mr. Hardin.

And he obviously read the email, he is just seething so hard that he literally does not want to talk to Hardin at all for any reason, rules be damned. He's a fucking child. I don't know what the magistrate will try to do if he insists on going through discovery to the end because Greer simply hates Hardin and will never cooperate.

 

[Debbie Macomber]

Once again, Russ argues his whole family should be put in witness protection from the kiwifarms mafia!