US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The fun thing is European countries (and Canada and the UK) are importing something similar -- It won't be long until aspects of Sharia law are implemented in certain areas of the UK because the Muslims simply will vote in a bloc and overrule everyone else -- I'm guessing mandated dress codes in public areas will be the first crack that appears, but who knows? Jeets are infamous for taking over companies and turning them into Jeet nests -- they're going to do the same thing to the Canadian government.

But I've seen some people have some success explaining to Eurocucks the American Nigger problem thusly: Imagine if 15% of your country were Gypsies, and they always voted for one specific political party, enough to sway the national vote every single time. That political party would do whatever they could to keep the Gypsies happy, even if it meant everyone else could go eat shit, because they don't need anyone else, they just need to keep the Gypsies happy. That's American politics, except our Gypsies are Niggers and instead of just being stupid worthless criminals, they're also violent, have sub-75 IQ, and have no impulse control at all -- while also having our entire education system talk about how oppressed and victimized they were by the rest of the country.
Also imagine that, rather than it being socially acceptable to talk about Gypsies in terms that would make Hitler blanche, everyone danced around them and pretended that their problems were your moral failing, and you had slogans like "German women, silent! A Gypsy woman is speaking."
 
Some fun facts about her:


Already was saved earlier but here’s the archive link for the brownstone article

 
What the fuck? Why is a literal fraudster getting a pardon?
This is the really ugly and indefensible side of trump, of outright corruption. It does go hand in hand of not giving a fuck about the literal deep state actors that should be guillotined but it’s definitely a bad look.

Someone more principled and less chaotic definitely would be preferable.

Trump is a weapon and is being used to reset a marxist captured US federal government
 
WWIII or are they just trying to get more money from the US? Also Jimmy Carter was the biggest retard president ever.

whomever controls the canal has the biggest stick stick to swing in international commerce so of course the Chinks don't want the US to control it.

I'm sure Chairman Meow would give his left testicle to have control of the canal but that shit ain't going to happen, no way the US allows a hostile power to get control of such a vital asset.

Really it should have never been given away in the first place, it was built with US money, US know how and US drive all the locals did was carry dirt and follow directions.
 
I think that calf kicks ruined MMA, as they are just so effective and so boring. They are used generously as well. It's just like a broken move in a fighting game, you expect it but it isn't fun to watch. Combat sports always get solved over time, but I crave something exciting and unpredictable. The UFC should have different rule sets for different matches that would highlight the fighter's styles.

Not to discount the gayness of F1, but they regularly change rules in arbitrary ways specifically to keep the game from getting solved. Imagine if in major league baseball, every 3 years, they changed the regulations on bat length and weight, ball size, and diamond layout. Perhaps the number of bases (including home) even vary between three and six.
 
I don't know if people are still talking about EBT but I have interesting things to say that are valuable and you should pay attention to them

most EBT goes to working families.

I get that if you work at the grocery store and/or shop at walmart you are regularly annoyed by polybabydaddic sheboons and pwt who you can tell by looking don't have jobs. they're probably on SSDI.

First of all, it's a massive social benefit to structure benefits in such a way that the children of these people are not malnourished. You can get all evolian about it and act like those children shouldn't be here in the first place but that's not a functional political position.

Second of all, again, *most EBT goes to working families.* These people aren't bugging the shit out of you, you don't notice them. Look up the income limits for various family sizes in your state, and also in different states.

For example a family of 4 in CA qualifies at a yearly income of $62,400. That's a breadwinner, a SAHM, and two kids.

I want you people who are angry about fatty fatty twobyfours schlurping up your tax dollars and turning them into more fatassery to stop and think that you don't spend time with a large cross section of young families. I don't think you'd have the same attitude towards the gibs if your basic impression was formed by the actual normal user of them. I'm too anxious to have had kids not at a high income, so I never qualified. But easily half *at least* of my mom social groups over two decades have gotten EBT. It's how people afford to start businesses, it's how they afford to have a SAHM, it's how they afford to save a down payment. You also automagically get them if you take in a kinship foster placement.

Childhood malnutrition is actually quite a lot worse than obesity but the optics of fat people buying soda and chips with EBT is a big enough problem at this point that if I were the boss I would do a nice bipartisan deal - lose soda, gain cooked food. Obviously something has to give and protecting the program is important to enough that people should be willing to lose soda, I agree.
 
For example a family of 4 in CA qualifies at a yearly income of $62,400. That's a breadwinner, a SAHM, and two kids.
As someone who lives in California, you can go fuck yourself. Food isn't that expensive here. Everyone is just retarded with their financials, so somewhere that is a pain to live in turns into an impossibility. The only ones who benefit from this system are the retarded, the niggers, and the goddamn insufferable fucking wetbacks. Learn basic math to budget or starve to death as you so rightly deserve if you cannot do basic addition and subtraction without a calculator.
 
Betting on yes. Will be happy to be wrong, though.
Then what? Will Robert enforce the order as well?

Trump should do the funny thing and dump the criminals straight into Boasberg's home. I'm sure the good judge will be most happy to receive the true and honest astronauts, doctors and engineers he just rescued.
 
most EBT goes to working families.
The main problem with this is that the job isn't paying enough. (edit: compared to asset prices i.e. homes, stocks) I feel like it's better to have the government make sure businesses can support workers with liveable wages. As opposed to a government redistribution program, which creates bad incentives and is full of abuse without any kind of market force stemming that issue.

I do think redistribution systems are necessary for the people who slip through the cracks. But we should make sure that the jobs (and the pay) are there first.
 
Last edited:
Back