Off-Topic Transgender Legislation and Litigation

In what context are intersex people being denied accurate passports? Is it all people with intersex conditions (or who claim to have intersex conditions) and are also trans? I don’t think they’re refusing to allow CAIS males change their sex to male, and I bet they aren’t even making them change it when the condition is discovered.
Of all the forced teaming that trannies do, I think the latching onto the DSD community is the most repulsive since they outnumber them 100 to 1
It's a deliberate effort on their part to conflate intersex with "trans" by lying about being intersex. They need "trans" and all that comes with it (violating boundaries and societal upheaval), they need it to be seen as a medical condition. They'll continue inflating the numbers of intersex as they've been, all the while simultaneously claiming intersex instead of "trans."
 
I don’t understand how troonery doesn’t count as its own religion. Asking me to call a dude in a dress a certified ladywomans is just as ridiculous as a dude collecting thousands of animals and insects to take a ride on an ark. At least with biblical stories, you can blame any inconsistencies on a thousand-year-old game of telephone or symbolism. This troon shit was invented like three seconds ago and we’re supposed to take it as complete fact and it gets to outrank literally everything else?
The part which gets me about the troon religion is that there is no payoff - most religions promise a reward to true believers in one or both of this life and the afterlife. The only 'reward' for believing in troonery is support from other believers and I'm just fine without that.
 
The part which gets me about the troon religion is that there is no payoff - most religions promise a reward to true believers in one or both of this life and the afterlife. The only 'reward' for believing in troonery is support from other believers and I'm just fine without that.
You’re not even allowed to feel good about being an ally! You have to UNLEARN YOUR BIAS and PUT IN THE WORK. And it’s never enough!
 
Ana Reyes should be removed from the bench for this insane nonsense.

She is the new high priestess of the troon religion.

gov.uscourts.dcd.276845.100.0_Page_01.jpg
gov.uscourts.dcd.276845.100.0_Page_02.jpg
gov.uscourts.dcd.276845.100.0_Page_03.jpg
gov.uscourts.dcd.276845.100.0_Page_04.jpg
gov.uscourts.dcd.276845.100.0_Page_05.jpg

Talbot v. United States
 
The part which gets me about the troon religion is that there is no payoff - most religions promise a reward to true believers in one or both of this life and the afterlife. The only 'reward' for believing in troonery is support from other believers and I'm just fine without that.
The payoff will be the kids, man. They legitimately are trying to fuck kids.
 
She is the new high priestess of the troon religion.
hoping this is appealed holy shit. the judge declares that suffering from gender dysphoria (as in being fucked in the head and depressed because you think youre the wrong sex) is the exact same thing as simply identifying as a tranny and there is no difference between the two, so in her opinion rejecting individuals from the military over gender dysphoria is per se discrimination against muh heckin queers.

the judge also accuses the military of trying to "obfuscate" that they really just want to get rid of trannies specifically which is funny because the judge herself is obfuscating the fact that gender dysphoria is a mental illness and its common fucking sense that mentally ill people should not be allowed to serve in any armed services and psych evals exist for the purpose of keeping them out, especially if the "treatment" the trannies themselves consider best consists of self-mutilation and a regime of self-poisoning with experimental chemicals

this is bongistan level insanity lol. making me side with the feds in a litigation
 
The part which gets me about the troon religion is that there is no payoff - most religions promise a reward to true believers in one or both of this life and the afterlife. The only 'reward' for believing in troonery is support from other believers and I'm just fine without that.
if you're a narc or a pervert, you have tons to gain from the troon religion. It offers attention, gratification of your fucked up fetishes, access to women without worrying about normal social conventions/separate spaces and an excuse to abuse complete strangers. Trooning out gives you the soft power of being an oppressed minority too. It's a narcissist's promised land in the here and now.
 
if you're a narc or a pervert, you have tons to gain from the troon religion. It offers attention, gratification of your fucked up fetishes, access to women without worrying about normal social conventions/separate spaces and an excuse to abuse complete strangers. Trooning out gives you the soft power of being an oppressed minority too. It's a narcissist's promised land in the here and now.
Fair, and what do allies get out of it? Is it just the ego boost that comes with supporting an oppressed group/being on the 'right side of history'?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CuntessMaximus
Holy fucknuggets, you can tell none of these dipshits served.

They (our mentally ill little cockwaffles pretending to be women) can't be deployed, you intellectual midgets. They can't be without their medications. Underway, accommodations can't be assured for them.

The hell is so hard to understand - the military is not the realm for social experimentation and wokeism. Take your desires to suck off girl-cock and stuff those desires up your ample asses, apologists who want to fight the military on this.
 
Fair, and what do allies get out of it? Is it just the ego boost that comes with supporting an oppressed group/being on the 'right side of history'?
Rationally speaking, there is little to gain from supporting a group of violent, narcissistic perverts apart from that ego boost. I think that the support is either born from ignorance of troons or there are other factors at play. The LGBT movement is treated as a monolithic entity and going against any vested group's interests is seen as a betrayal of the movement as a whole. Troons exploit that and use social coercion to get what they want. If you're a lesbian and your entire support network is from the LGBT community, a troon can cut you off from that if you upset them.

So, if you're an ally and you feel uncomfortable about Lilith's advances on you, you can't speak out without being labeled a TERF. You wouldn't want to be a bad person, would you? Even as your senses are screaming at you that the person in front of you is a man, and a dangerous one at that? Only good people support the LGBT movement and if you don't support Lilith, that means you're a bad person.
 
I’ve never really read a federal legal opinion before. Do they usually use such emotional and manipulative language? This seems incredibly unprofessional.
View attachment 7142001
it reads exactly like alyssa mercuntes lolsuit which exists only so she can complain about gamergate in front of a judge to satisfy her attention fetish. except in this case its a federal judge behaving like a histrionic plaintiff
 
This is a fairly stupid argument from the AP.

"On the campaign trail, Donald Trump used contentiousness around transgender people’s access to sports and bathrooms to fire up conservative voters and sway undecideds. And in his first months back in office, Trump has pushed the issue further, erasing mention of transgender people on government websites and passports and trying to remove them from the military.

It’s a contradiction of numbers that reveals a deep cultural divide: Transgender people make up less than 1% of the U.S. population, but they have become a major piece on the political chess board — particularly Trump’s."

Under the new Trump administration, this year’s Transgender Day of Visibility has a different tenor

Let me rewrite this to illustrate why it is so dumb.

"It’s a contradiction of numbers that reveals a deep cultural divide: SERIAL KILLERS make up less than 1% of the U.S. population, but they have become a major piece on the political chess board — particularly Trump’s."

Just because there is a numerically small population doesn't mean whe shouldn't respond to it forefully and decisively.
 
This is a fairly stupid argument from the AP.

"On the campaign trail, Donald Trump used contentiousness around transgender people’s access to sports and bathrooms to fire up conservative voters and sway undecideds. And in his first months back in office, Trump has pushed the issue further, erasing mention of transgender people on government websites and passports and trying to remove them from the military.

It’s a contradiction of numbers that reveals a deep cultural divide: Transgender people make up less than 1% of the U.S. population, but they have become a major piece on the political chess board — particularly Trump’s."

Under the new Trump administration, this year’s Transgender Day of Visibility has a different tenor

Let me rewrite this to illustrate why it is so dumb.

"It’s a contradiction of numbers that reveals a deep cultural divide: SERIAL KILLERS make up less than 1% of the U.S. population, but they have become a major piece on the political chess board — particularly Trump’s."

Just because there is a numerically small population doesn't mean whe shouldn't respond to it forefully and decisively.
If this is their argument then once again it's something that can be fired back at them. Why are liberals dying on this hill and giving this extremely tiny minority so much media time? Biden literally hired like 5 different trans people into his administration despite being an extremely tiny minority. How many T.V shows, movies, games, etc now have to have trans rep on it when they're such an extremely tiny minority? Why are leftists kicking out toddlers for "Transphobia"?

Toddler kicked out of nursery for being transphobic​

 
Back