Crime Attorney General Pam Bondi directs federal prosecutors to seek death penalty for Luigi Mangione - Mangione, 26, was charged with fatally shooting UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York City last year.

Attorney General Pamela Bondi on Tuesday directed federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty for Luigi Mangione, the man accused of gunning down UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York City last year.

Mangione, 26, was federally charged in December with stalking and murdering Thompson after the CEO was fatally shot on the streets of midtown Manhattan. He was also charged with first-degree murder in furtherance of terrorism by state prosecutors.

Bondi said that she was directing prosecutors to seek the death penalty as part of "President Trump’s agenda to stop violent crime and Make America Safe Again."

"Luigi Mangione’s murder of Brian Thompson — an innocent man and father of two young children — was a premeditated, cold-blooded assassination that shocked America," Bondi said in a statement.

Mangione has pled not guilty to all charges. His lawyer did not immediately return a request for comment about the attorney general's request.

Thompson's Dec. 4 killing and subsequent colossal manhunt for his masked assassin captivated the nation for weeks.

The gunman fled on a bike outside the New York Hilton Midtown, where Thompson was staying for the health care company's annual investors' meeting, police said. City surveillance footage showed the gunman riding into Central Park before disappearing.

Five days later, on Dec. 9, Mangione was recognized in a McDonald’s in Altoona, Pennsylvania, and arrested that day.

Article Link

Archive
 
Last edited:
A question for the Free Luigi people: Hypothetically let's say Luigi gets off without prison time or he does 25 years and is released. If one of Brian Thompson's two sons, now fatherless, grew up and shot Luigi dead in the streets for making them grow up without a dad, would you support that?
Making kids grow up without a dad isn't a crime or women the world over would be brought up on charges.
So OJ was never a murderer because a Jury found him not guilty. Cool.
The jury cannot be wrong, by definition.
Not illegally so therefore killing him wasn't in response to murder but because Magione didn't like the guys job?
The "guy's job" resulted in deaths, and manslaughter is an offense.
Half of which most are too stupid to be jury selected.
Says you.
I haven't anything about our legislators. I'm going off the literal definition of murder. Then one anyone with an ounce of common sense knows.
Lobbyists write legislation. Unless the official law enforcement channels wise up and start prosecuting people "just doing their job" we're going to see more vigilante justice.
"I don't have a rebuttal so uhhh STRAWMAN!" thank you for your concession.
Your example was so off base that it wasn't right and wasn't even wrong; it was just retarded.
A win means something was done. Nothing was accomplished besides making someone else the CEO who is going to do the exact same shit Thompson did. So congrats, you got another guy promoted to the same position to do the exact same job, REALLY doing your part to change the world
By this logic we shouldn't prosecute spic gang members because there's always another one anyway. You're pretty stupid.
 
It's not about achieving economic success, that's looking at it like a leftist. It's about being part of the Big Pharma conspiracy. The "victim" was a knowing participant in the Covid/Vaccine/Death pipeline.
Yea I'm sure Brian Thompson woke up every morning cackling evilly about about all the death and horror he planned to inflict on innocent people that particular day.

I say this as an anime fan but people need to lay off the anime and fiction in general. It's starting to warp people's views on human behavior.

Life isn't a stupid ass Marvel movie and Luigi Mangione isn't Iron Man.
 
Yea I'm sure Brian Thompson woke up every morning cackling evilly about about all the death and horror he planned to inflict on innocent people that day.

I say this as an anime fan but people need to lay off the anime and fiction in general. It's starting to warp people's views on human behavior.
Honestly, most people who are as far removed from the deaths as Mr. Thompson was don't think like that. It's easier to deny people, or in his case I suppose, be indifferent about what your company does, when you never need to look them in the face.
 
It always amazes how people will simp for a good-looking white man from an Ivy-league university (UPenn).

Is the healthcare system a racketeering operation? Yes! Is big business exploitative and causing damage? Yes! Do things such as arbitration agreements undermine the law, and make the corporation, both in healthcare and other industries, have unequal footing to actual citizens? FUCKING YES!

However, Mangione did nothing to aid in stopping that system. He shot a man - albeit a very sketchy one - in broad daylight. That's fucking it. If you read his manifesto, or least what is available, it incoherent, rambling, nonsensical rant. He just yelling what far smarter people have been pointing about the system, except they have tried to search and advocate for permanent solutions.

It really is a symptom and concern that so many people are getting wet and wanting ride this man's dick, make him a cult of personality, and have it lost on them that they are more concerned about this man, than actually have a genuine discussion on a very broken system. Very ironic as well.

IDK, just my two cents...
 
It always amazes how people will simp for a good-looking white man from an Ivy-league university (UPenn).

Is the healthcare system a racketeering operation? Yes! Is big business exploitative and causing damage? Yes! Do things such as arbitration agreements undermine the law, and make the corporation, both in healthcare and other industries, have unequal footing to actual citizens? FUCKING YES!

However, Mangione did nothing to aid in stopping that system. He shot a man - albeit a very sketchy one - in broad daylight. That's fucking it. If you read his manifesto, or least what is available, it incoherent, rambling, nonsensical rant. He just yelling what far smarter people have been pointing about the system, except they have tried to search and advocate for permanent solutions.

It really is a symptom and concern that so many people are getting wet and wanting ride this man's dick, make him a cult of personality, and have it lost on them that they are more concerned about this man, than actually have a genuine discussion on a very broken system. Very ironic as well.
I feel like people just kind of gave up on solutions because none of them will ever be implemented. Luigi did what people fantasize about, and that's why they fellate him.

They're not wrong, either. I can complain about the issues you mentioned until I'm blue in the face, but since the insurance industry is practically untouchable, nothing I say matters.
 
Yea I'm sure Brian Thompson woke up every morning cackling evilly about about all the death and horror he planned to inflict on innocent people that particular day.
No, but he:
  1. Denied more claims per capita than any other major health insurance company in the industry.
  2. Was in the process of developing an AI-based system to effectively deny more claims.
  3. Corruption via engaging in bribery of elected officials (There's a video clip of Brian Thompson bragging that Nancy Pelosi works for him)
  4. Supported and enabling the Obamacare act that raised the price of health insurance for millions of Americans.
  5. Supported a faulty and untested COVID-19 vaccine and distributing it to millions of Americans, many of which died or developed permanent health conditions as a result.
  6. Supported and enabled Big Pharma in general.
  7. Received billions in donations and investments from Blackrock and other globalist invest firms.
  8. Under his leadership, started a policy of paying for female employees to travel out of state to get abortions after Roe vs. Wade was overturned.
  9. Provided insurance coverage for transgender gender mutilation of children.
Regardless of how he felt, he was a leftist scumbag and I don't feel very sympathetic towards him, and I don't know know why the most openly far-right administration in the 21st century feels the need to go to bat for this guy's legacy.
 
The jury cannot be wrong, by definition.
So OJ was absolutely innocent and there's no argument whatsoever
The "guy's job" resulted in deaths, and manslaughter is an offense.
The guys job wasn't to save people. Why the fuck is that so difficult to understand?
Your example was so off base that it wasn't right and wasn't even wrong; it was just retarded.
Yet you can't even respond to it because you know you know what dumb fucking hypocrite you are.
By this logic we shouldn't prosecute spic gang members because there's always another one anyway. You're pretty stupid.
Those spics actually go out of their way to kill and harm people, the CEO of a company does not. The CEO of Remington isn't responsible when a retarded kid picks up their product and kills themselves or other people, the CEO is even less responsible from some random sad sack dying of disease. It's quite literally not his fucking problem.
Why don't you go after board members of these companies?
Oh because that would require the slightest amount of effort and that's too tall of an order for you, you just want to point fingers at who's the most convenient.
 
If one of Brian Thompson's two sons, now fatherless, grew up and shot Luigi dead in the streets for making them grow up without a dad, would you support that?
I figure that's what you sign up for when you kill someone. Ancient royalty and warlords would resolve this by just killing/exiling all of them, but we live in a wonderful time with this thing called "the court of public opinion" so I have to direct you to this image:
1743535598185.png

Without condoning or condemning, this is what it boils down to, and the children of a monster CEO are really hard for most people under 40 to empathize with.

Dude cold blooded planned and murdered a dude for personal reasons. I don't give a shit that the average Redditard thinks Lugi is some sort of hero for shooting a rich dude.

Kill someone in something other then self-defence you forfeit your own life it's that simple and needs to be that simple. If we good back to the good ole day of honor killing and vendetta's things will get nasty quickly
You missed the point of the argument. A single man plans a killing and it warrants the death penalty, but an important man plans to implement policy that leaves thousands to die for his own profit and it's considered good business. A politician plans to kill thousands in another country for oil and resources and it's a necessary measure for national security. The latter two never see any legal action. Just because you don't pull a trigger doesn't mean you aren't a murderer. Hiring a hitman is illegal for this reason.
 
No, but he:
  1. Denied more claims per capita than any other major health insurance company in the industry.
  2. Was in the process of developing an AI-based system to effectively deny more claims.
  3. Corruption via engaging in bribery of elected officials (There's a video clip of Brian Thompson bragging that Nancy Pelosi works for him)
  4. Supported and enabling the Obamacare act that raised the price of health insurance for millions of Americans.
  5. Supported a faulty and untested COVID-19 vaccine and distributing it to millions of Americans, many of which died or developed permanent health conditions as a result.
  6. Supported and enabled Big Pharma in general.
  7. Received billions in donations and investments from Blackrock and other globalist invest firms.
  8. Under his leadership, started a policy of paying for female employees to travel out of state to get abortions after Roe vs. Wade was overturned.
  9. Provided insurance coverage for transgender gender mutilation of children.
Regardless of how he felt, he was a leftist scumbag and I don't feel very sympathetic towards him, and I don't know know why the most openly far-right administration in the 21st century feels the need to go to bat for this guy's legacy.
I knew of a few of those, but the bribery and troon shit is new to me. Dig the fucker up and shoot him again.
 
Imagine seeing a large group of people championing the death of your father.

Like the CEO’s and employees of these companies that refused my father his medical procedure? But hey, just following orders, I understand, gotta meet the yearly quota of exponential monetary growth of shareholders and corporate bigwigs, instead of providing the care they contractually promised and we paid for. Fuck saving people’s lives.

Yea I'm sure Brian Thompson woke up every morning cackling evilly about about all the death and horror he planned to inflict on innocent people that particular day.
I’m sure Brian Thompson woke up every morning, gleefully counted his shekels all the while knowing exactly what the corporation, and by extension he was doing in wrongfully and illegally denying care to people that had paid for their services, that led to deaths and suffering of his customers
 
Last edited:
Those spics actually go out of their way to kill and harm people, the CEO of a company does not. The CEO of Remington isn't responsible when a retarded kid picks up their product and kills themselves or other people, the CEO is even less responsible from some random sad sack dying of disease. It's quite literally not his fucking problem.
... Do you know what the intended purpose of health insurance is?
 
I feel like people just kind of gave up on solutions because none of them will ever be implemented. Luigi did what people fantasize about, and that's why they fellate him.

They're not wrong, either. I can complain about the issues you mentioned until I'm blue in the face, but since the insurance industry is practically untouchable, nothing I say matters.
So basically we, as a larger society, are accepting nihilism and meaningless violence as the new status quo? That is what concerns me here.

Also, I get where you are coming from with frustration with sketchy execs, but I can't think of a single I know who ever, EVER, even thought about going into broad daylight and shooting someone. At least not a law-abiding citizen, though laws are not always just, and "law-abiding citizens" are not always good people.
 
So basically we, as a larger society, are accepting nihilism and meaningless violence as the new status quo? That is what concerns me here.

Also, I get where you are coming from with frustration with sketchy execs, but I can't think of a single I know who ever, EVER, even thought about going into broad daylight and shooting someone. At least not a law-abiding citizen, though laws are not always just, and "law-abiding citizens" are not always good people.
Yeah, unfortunately. I don't see the system changing any time soon, and the division people have over party lines - especially what constitutes a "leftist" - is a notable problem. Whatever the two parties claim to be, neither of them actually give a shit about the average person.

It's not something well-adjusted people think about, that's for sure.
 
Last edited:
... Do you know what the intended purpose of health insurance is?
Do you think the CEO of a health insurance company comes and approves or denies every single claim? Or even sets the rules?
I'm all for being angry at these companies, but at least be angry at the right people instead of the literal face of the company there to draw all the attention away from those making the actual decision making.
It's like killing a tyrants body double.
 
I don't know know why the most openly far-right administration in the 21st century feels the need to go to bat for this guy's legacy.
Simple: donny is the "law and order" president and he needs his simps to understand that murder is bad unless you are one of his buddies and you do it by denying claims for life saving care. Then it's okay
 
Simple: donny is the "law and order" president and he needs his simps to understand that murder is bad unless you are one of his buddies and you do it by denying claims for life saving care. Then it's okay
Do you really want antifa, journos, and fat women deciding via court of public opinion which extrajudicial killings are ok and which ones aren't?
 
... Do you know what the intended purpose of health insurance is?

It’s clear he thinks it’s to make its shareholders more money. Surely health insurance employees shouldn’t be concerned with providing health insurance to its customers. Their actual job is to employ every tactic to not provide coverage.
 
Last edited:
Back