Very true, but it's a very useful one.
PDOs only apply to labeling afaik, if anything its akin to trademarks (which we have in America). An American could make something the exact same as Champagne and sell it in Europe, they would just have to call it sparkling wine or something.
That’s because the chips act didn’t fucking work because at the end of the day they didn’t have to open factories for real to get any fucking benefits because as it turns out the only thing companies really care about is actual loss and incentives don’t do jack shit retard.
you're a moron and there's no helping you. you cannot conceive that physical items have a value beyond the monetary for some reason. do you think people stockpile ammo and canned food to sell them? no, of course not, they stockpile it to have it ready in case of them needing to use it. my point was and continues to be that it is retarded to compare physical commodities which have value other than money to stock trading, which is always done to avoid the direct analogy to gambling, which is you put money into a system that may or may not give you a return, and you hope. if you go with the safe best you'll win very low amounts, but its still technically a gamble because as far as you know, there may be new legislation that fucked up something you bet on.
Hate to break it to you, but they don't. Especially when it comes to investing - a very necessary human activity.
These aren't investments, moron - they're insurance policies.
Then why even compare it to the stock market?
bullets don't have value beyond the monetary? okay, you're just a fucking idiot.
gamestop never had a chance at hurting globohomo mega firms and unironically robin hood shutting it down probably stopped a bunch of retarded retail investors from losing money buying the top of a pump and dump.
i didn't, the other guy did by bringing up that "physical investments", aka fucking buying a thing in real life, were identical to stock investments, as if your items magically vanish when the value goes down the way your money vanished when stock values drop. i just pointed out that it was a bad comparison. you guys are really bad at this, please consider moving to canada and applying for MAID.
Which illustrates yet again, for approximately the millionth time, that absent insider knowledge investing in individual stocks is a loser's game and that long-term passive investing in index funds is the way to go.
Trump could accidentally drop a nuke on Miami and you retards would claim its actually 150iq 5d chess
You are genuinely retarded. Buying Gold as an investment is Identical to buying stocks as an investment, just with generally lower liquidity and lower volatility. Your ownership position in the company doesn't magically vanish either when the value goes down.
I'm sincerely, sincerely sorry that you're a poorfag. Once you have some $$$ saved up you'll understand.
its honestly baffling
The point is that unlike a nuke, things like the penguin tariff cost no time or resources and have no consequences, yet retards still obsess over it as a serious blunder
