Disaster Founding WPATH Academic Defended NAMBLA Leader, Child Porn, and Worked with Pro-Pedophile Academic Journal - inb4 "erm, we already knew they were pedos"

(https://reduxx.info/exclusive-found...d-worked-with-pro-pedophile-academic-journal/)
(https://archive.ph/wip/4PUb1)

Vern-L.-Bullough-wpath-1392x783.jpg

Reduxx can reveal that a founding member of the organization now known as the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) was in correspondence with and defended a leading figure behind a notorious pro-pedophile lobby group. American sexologist Vern L. Bullough was a founding academic involved with the US-based Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association, later renamed to WPATH, and served on the editorial team for a pro-pedophile academic publication which advocated for the normalization of adult-child sexual relations.

Bullough was a prominent sexologist. He was Dean of the Faculty of Natural and Social Science at the state university college of Buffalo, New York, in addition to acting as a professor of history at the San Fernando Valley State college. He was also professor emeritus at the State University of New York (SUNY), as well as Faculty President at California State University Northridge, and a president of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, founded in 1957.

Bullough was the founding director of the Center for Sex Research at Cal State, Northridge, where he organized international conferences on prostitution, pornography, and gender identity. The university now has a “gender-affirming care” clinic.

4BFA09FB-4D17-4ECF-B5A9-0172F641F941.png

Bullough published and spoke on the topics of transvestitism, transsexualism, gender identity, and child sexuality. In 1973, he was the first speaker to present at a conference organized by World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), when it was still known as the Erickson Educational Foundation. His lecture on “Transsexualism in the Past” came directly after an introduction by sexologist John Money, his colleague, who pioneered the development of the concept of “gender identity” and medical “transition.”

His most well-known books include “Sexual Variance in Society and History” (1976), “Homosexuality: A History” (1979), and “Cross-Dressing, Sex and Gender” (1993), which is still used as a textbook in some university gender studies programs.

In addition to his role in the early formation of WPATH, Bullough was a member of the editorial board of Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia, which advocated for sexual relationships between adults and children.

vlb.jpg

In 1996, Bullough was interviewed for Paidika by editor Joseph Geraci — with whom he maintained a close working relationship, as Bullough’s position on the editorial board lent academic credence to the pro-pedophile journal.

Despite repeatedly arguing that his interest in the topic of pedophilia, or “intergenerational sex,” as he referred to it, was purely academic, Bullough revealed during the Paidika interview that he believed there was a “hysteria” surrounding the topic of child sexual abuse, and blamed “feminists” for the widespread opposition to pedophilia.

“The feminist influence also most certainly is a factor in the hysteria,” Bullough said. “Some radical feminists, though thankfully a minority, have gone so far as to claim that every female child was probably sexually abused in some way by a male member of their family, and can even define sexual abuse as show-and-tell and other childhood activities.” Bullough did not provide a reference for his claims in regards to his argument.

“I do not subscribe to their version. Unfortunately, many of these most militant feminists are involved in the child-abuse industry,” he added. Bullough defined the term “child-abuse industry” as involving individuals he saw as profiting from the “hysteria” over childhood sexual abuse.

“Paedophiles have become the scapegoat for everything that seems to be wrong with American society and the family,” Bullough continued. “We have institutionalized the hysteria… Paedophiles are so excluded from mainstream American society that they cannot really say what they do or what they believe in.”

But perhaps most disturbingly, Bullough kept regular correspondences with a top member of the North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), a lobby group that advocates for the normalization of sexual relationships between adult men and young boys.

Attorney Lawrence Stanley was a member of the steering committee for NAMBLA, which advocated for relaxing laws regarding sexual activity between men and boys. Stanley also published a newsletter titled “Uncommon Desires,” which focused on pedophilic relationships between adult men and young girls.

stanley-letter87-1392x696.png

In July 1987, Stanley wrote to Bullough imploring him to read and consider his article “The Hysteria over Child Pornography and Pedophilia,” which was soon published in Paidika and Playboy. In an introductory letter, Stanley told Bullough: “With respect to sizeable collections of child pornography, it is my impression that the Kinsey Institute’s is larger than the Institute for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality.”

Stanley’s article, “The Hysteria over Child Pornography and Pedophilia,” argued that law enforcement officers engage in deliberate entrapment schemes. “Under the guise of ‘protecting children,’ millions of taxpayer dollars have been spent to investigate and prosecute would-be consumers of child pornography, many of them individuals who do not pose any immediate danger to children.”

Stanley went on to describe at length various international publications specializing in pedophilic content to the sexologist, and stated that the “largest source for erotic depictions of young girls is Japan.” The NAMBLA attorney added: “I hope this information has been both interesting and helpful to you.”

letter-cp-1.png

Bullough replied in a letter dated January 1988, congratulating Stanley on the publication of his article.

“As far as collections of movies of child porn, the San Francisco Institute is much larger, simply because the major distributors of porn films in the United States, particularly child porn, got rid of incriminating evidence by donating it to the Institute in San Francisco.”

In a follow-up letter the next month, Bullough suggested: “If you get good duplicates of material and don’t know where to send them, I would like to add to my collection, most of which is now in the California State University, Northridge, library.”

In September 1989, Stanley was found in possession of hundreds of child pornography publications, as well as five videotapes, which he had kept locked in a safe under his bed. Various titles of the magazines included Bambina Sex, Children Love, Lolita Color Special, Loving Children, Masturbating Lolita and Schoolgirls.

Most of the photographs depicted very young girls with their genitalia exposed. In certain instances, children were seen to be masturbating or urinating, and other photographs depicted prepubescent girls engaged in oral sex with adult men.

In his defense, Stanley claimed to be a sex researcher acting on behalf of The Institute for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality, and claimed that that as an academic researcher, he was entitled to possess the child pornography under the First Amendment.

Stanley testified in court that the pornography was acquired in connection to research he was conducting on the topic of “The Child Pornography Myth,” an article he authored which was published in the Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal. The magazines were obtained in the Netherlands, where the journal Paidika was published — and where Bullough had himself just visited.

letter-cp.png

As the court proceedings were underway in 1991, Bullough submitted a character testimonial in favor of Stanley, calling him a “knowledgeable professional in the field of human sexuality,” and that he would “strongly vouch for his character and integrity.”

Bullough wrote: “I have known Lawrence Stanley for four or five years and worked closely with him for part of that time in publishing a newsletter for the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex.”

E813549A-89DC-49C2-8FB7-7C047347AA4F-1-1024x538.png

In 1993, federal authorities accused Stanley of conspiring with photographer Don Marcus to import child pornography. Marcus fled to France to escape prosecution, and asked Stanley to retrieve a suitcase that was found to contain child pornography. His attorney argued that Stanley did not know what was in the suitcase, and a jury acquitted him in 1993.

It was during this time that Bullough again argued in his defense and sent him multiple letters of reference. The academic leveraged his credentials in universities and as an expert in the area of modern sex research.

“I can speak with some expertise on the subject of child pornography. I know of few topics more deserving of intense, scholarly investigation than child porn, a topic about which there is both a great deal of hysteria couple with a lack of information,” Bullough prefaced.

The professor then pleaded for the release of the “seized material,” referring to the child pornography magazines that were confiscated by authorities. He requested that Stanley “and others” should be permitted to “examine” the pornographic content, and that it might be “deemed suitable for widespread publication.”

stanley-letter1.png

“In the past we used to cover up child abuse, now we exploit it and exaggerate it,” Bullough said. “What we need is to do some serious investigation. Lawrence has an effective methodology to study the materials, and should be allowed to continue the studies he started.”

In 1998, a Dutch court convicted Stanley in absentia for the sexual abuse of three children ages 7 to 10. As Stanley’s legal troubles worsened, he fled the United States for Brazil. In 2002, he was arrested on charges of child exploitation. Stanley had built an international business photographing Brazilian girls and selling their photos online. Stanley’s “MiniModels” web site featured photos of girls ages 8 to 14 in what authorities described as “sensual poses.” Police said Stanley paid the girls $20 to $40 for each photo session.

Bullough was also a main organizer of the World Pornography Conference, with the first event taking place in 1998 at the Center for Sex Research at Cal State Northridge, with the financial backing of the pornography industry’s lobby group, the Free Speech Coalition.

One journalist, Matt Balash, who attended the 1998 conference took note of a presentation on child pornography, which included photos of a boy holding the photographer’s penis.

“Dr. Bullough thought it was OK as long as the photographer was a professional and had obtained permission from the parents. Dr. Bullough related how his kids used to pull on his schwong in the shower. Matt asked if Dr. Bullough invited other children into the shower to pull on his schwong. A conference organizer and hospitality lawyer stepped in to reprove Matt for asking inappropriate questions.”

BULLOUGH-HBIGDA-1024x717.png

When Bullough passed away in 2006, his obituary, published by the Los Angeles Times, was penned by former WPATH president, and former president of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, Eli Coleman.

“It would be very hard to find somebody that had so extensively studied so many areas within sexuality,” Coleman said. “Vern was all over the field — not in a superficial way but in a very deep way.”
 
It amuses me greatly that the TRAs still hold WPATH up as their defacto scientific reference point, despite the fact it was instigated by a pedo, is full of nothing and has been populated by child rapists and perverts wanting to castrate kids ever since.
That's why they like it.
 
“The feminist influence also most certainly is a factor in the hysteria,” Bullough said. “Some radical feminists, though thankfully a minority, have gone so far as to claim that every female child was probably sexually abused in some way by a male member of their family, and can even define sexual abuse as show-and-tell and other childhood activities.” Bullough did not provide a reference for his claims in regards to his argument.
Lmao even back then they hated "terfs" It goes very deep for these freaks.
 
Lmao even back then they hated "terfs" It goes very deep for these freaks.
I don't know if you've seen the documentary chickenhawk (It's on YouTube) But it's about nambla in the '90s. lesbians and some women can be seen in it briefly fighting off the nambla representatives trying to join a pride parade.
 
Lmao even back then they hated "terfs" It goes very deep for these freaks.
They do. They hate all people who protect children. That’s why there is a campaign to remove parental rights
-named person legislation in scotland
-laws on surrogacy set precedents for simply removing a child at birth and buying it
-social services removing children who the parents won’t allow to troon out.
The parents are the primary protectors of any child, so they must be removed. Teachers act in loco parentis so they must be subverted for access. The state is last resort backup so they too must be subverted.
I will say this for the radfems - they are absolutely spot on when they point out that part of the hatred comes from women saying no to sexual access to children. Think on the Karen meme. Yes it’s funny, but that tiger mom stuff also protects children. Women ARE gatekeepers, and men are the ones physically able to punch back, and they will try their hardest to subvert that any way they can
WPATH are demons straight from hell.
 
Despite repeatedly arguing that his interest in the topic of pedophilia, or “intergenerational sex,” as he referred to it, was purely academic
The 'I buy it for the articles' defence. 'Intergenerational sex' is a new one for me, surprised it didn't catch on in favour of the much more explicit MAP.
No one who is doing research into child porn needs actual images of child porn.
How can I know heroin is bad if I don't shoot up once or twice to make sure? Eating shit is disgusting? Have you even tried it?
Now pedos hide what they are
[Cunny Groypers have entered the chat]
 
I m gonna add based on my interactions with liberal idoits or normies.

You make honest head way talking about "grooming" as a process, a good segway or concern is roblox online shit. Then onto real life and what proper and safe boundaries kids should have.

Then you weave in how alot of the trans movement in relation to kids resembles "grooming" now you cant make the direct trans=grooming.

But after you get people to agree encouraging kids to keep secrets from their parents, talking about genitalia, the slow but steady process of breaking down barriers, etc is bad they will have a moment of reflection about this bullshit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Otterly and Hojicha
The 'I buy it for the articles' defence. 'Intergenerational sex' is a new one for me, surprised it didn't catch on in favour of the much more explicit MAP.
The word-salad factory runs at full speed finding new ways to hide their degenaracy. Or tries to lessen the impact on what they want. Like how George Carlyn described how "Shell-shock" became "post traumatic stress disorder"

After all "intergenerational sex" can also mean a young adult man / woman with an older adult man / woman
 
After all "intergenerational sex" can also mean a young adult man / woman with an older adult man / woman
Exactly, it's much better PR because of its ambiguity, but I am rapidly coming around to the idea these guys get off on being open about what they are.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Terfmaster9000
uhhhhhhhhhhh
>Stanley’s article, “The Hysteria over Child Pornography and Pedophilia,” argued that law enforcement officers engage in deliberate entrapment schemes. “Under the guise of ‘protecting children,’ millions of taxpayer dollars have been spent to investigate and prosecute would-be consumers of child pornography, many of them individuals who do not pose any immediate danger to children.”

He's right lol

>“The feminist influence also most certainly is a factor in the hysteria,” Bullough said. “Some radical feminists, though thankfully a minority, have gone so far as to claim that every female child was probably sexually abused in some way by a male member of their family, and can even define sexual abuse as show-and-tell and other childhood activities.” Bullough did not provide a reference for his claims in regards to his argument.

>“I do not subscribe to their version. Unfortunately, many of these most militant feminists are involved in the child-abuse industry,” he added. Bullough defined the term “child-abuse industry” as involving individuals he saw as profiting from the “hysteria” over childhood sexual abuse.

He was right

>Stanley went on to describe at length various international publications specializing in pedophilic content to the sexologist, and stated that the “largest source for erotic depictions of young girls is Japan.” The NAMBLA attorney added: “I hope this information has been both interesting and helpful to you.”

The harpies at Reduxx are coming for your anime.
 
This is undeniable proof that troon surgeries for kids was a way to push the Overton Window towards pedo shit. Fuck these “people,” hell isn’t hot enough for them.
It took me far too long to realize this. I've always despised troon shit being pushed on kids, but I figured it was mostly just a side effect of a subculture gaining power. It's become increasingly clear how much of this movement is being very deliberately spearheaded by the absolute lowest of the low with the absolute worst intentions.

When this movement is finally beaten back, I hope people are reminded of 1 Kings 18:40. There is no other way to solve the problem.
 
Of fucking course they called it that

I've told the story once or twice before on the Farms about my friend who was this committed libertarian and wanted very badly to work in First Amendment law because he believed passionately in defending people's right to speech.

Until he started actually working in that field and attending conferences, and found out the entire thing was just porn pushers including bestiality/pedo porn pushers trying to redraw the line just a little bit further every year. He ended up leaving the whole field in disgust and does some normal, boring area of law now because at least he doesn't have to go to events full of child pornographers.
 
Back