Celebrity Meghan Markle / Rachel Meghan Markle / Meghan, Duchess of Sussex / Meghan Sussex / The Alliterate One - Markle Snarkle

lol Charles telling Harry that there isn't enough money to go around and that he "can't pay for everyone" is a classic technique to flush out a gold digger.
You tell a family member that the money is drying up. Family member then mentions it to their potentially greedy partner, who then packs it in and leaves if they were just after cash.
Unfortunately for the royal family Meghan stayed, probably thinking she was playing the long game and would somehow be queen of the whole world eventually. Somehow.
 
It’s also one-of-a-kind. Haute Couture clothing is made only once and the client has exclusive lifelong access to the design. There’s some hilarious petty drama in the fashion world when designers make a second design too close to the first. I’m not arguing the price is justified, just giving additional context.
That is interesting. It seems like it would be hard to enforce for something generic like this. (I actually kind of like the cape and the ruching (?) on the top. It's not the ugliest thing she's ever worn by a long shot.)
 
That is interesting. It seems like it would be hard to enforce for something generic like this. (I actually kind of like the cape and the ruching (?) on the top. It's not the ugliest thing she's ever worn by a long shot.)
My biggest peeve with her style right now is her wearing expensive white wool to cook in. I get it’s for her sad beige aesthetic, but most people that actually cook regularly don’t wear expensive white wool to cook in, because things splatter occasionally. Additionally, it just looks boring. She can still look sophisticated in bright reds too, but she can’t pull away from her usual beige, white, off white, navy blue, and black wardrobe.
 
She and Charles were both inexcusably neglectful parents. Wharfe talks about a time when Charles saw his children three days out of two months
Meh… Charles came from a pretty screwy family where that kind of stuff is normal. I’d personally blame Diana more since she came from a background where she SHOULD know right from wrong when it comes to child rearing.
If somebody knows the most expensive thing Catherine, wife to the heir to the throne, has worn ever aside from her Alexander McQueen Wedding dress ($332,000) please share. As far as I am aware it is her AQ dress at her sisters wedding at ~$14,000 or the blue Philippa Lepley dress at ~14.5.
That’s because Catherine is the real deal.

She shows up in 100£ off the rack dress and LOOKS like the queen she is.

Meghan usually looks terrible in million dollar wardrobe. Likely because she’s a brandsnob who’ll buy a Dior no matter how bad it looks on her because it’s a Dior.

And somehow she hasn’t learned to dress for her weird ass body/frame.

Notice how relatively good she looked on Suits when she had professionals dressing her, and she didn’t have the star power yet to tell them to go F themselves and they have no idea what they’re doing and she NEEEDS the Dior!
 
Notice how relatively good she looked on Suits when she had professionals dressing her, and she didn’t have the star power yet to tell them to go F themselves and they have no idea what they’re doing and she NEEEDS the Dior!
After the first few seasons, the wardrobe department was putting Meghan and the others in Chanel, Tom Ford, and the like.

After she married Harry, instead of buying British designer's items, she went with French brands instead of British designers, which irritated the other RF members. Catherine almost exclusively wears British clothing.
 
Speaking of which, she’s writing her own shitty marketing copy. She writes about pantry staples like they’re family heirlooms she’s parting with for the world’s benefit. Imagine taking yourself this seriously.
I couldn't make it through the first paragraph without laughing at the bit about sticking love notes in there. Love the implication of "when you're thinking of your special someone, think about spreading m- I mean me and my spread"

as if people are gagging to get their hands on her crap.
A pretty accurate assessment of how Meg thinks the world sees her.

"Two Buck Chuck"
Didn't expect Meghan to be connected to Feed & Seed lore. Alternatively, in the timeline where she didn't bag a royal this is her nickname among the johns of LA.

It is now. Move aside moonbump, there's a new penis in town.
Jesus Christ that's horrifying. If you ever wanted to start a "Meghan is a man" rumor without an alleged bulge pic, this is a good photo.
I swear, it's like I have ESPN
 
I’d personally blame Diana more since she came from a background where she SHOULD know right from wrong when it comes to child rearing
Diana came from a very important and fucked up aristocratic family. I’m pretty sure her mom ran off when she was a kid. Her answer to that was to keep the boys away from their dad and be a BPD nightmare.
 
Diana came from a very important and fucked up aristocratic family. I’m pretty sure her mom ran off when she was a kid. Her answer to that was to keep the boys away from their dad and be a BPD nightmare.
I faintly recall coverage of Diana around when she died in the US tried to make it out like she was a commoner. Isn't she related to Churchill?
 
I faintly recall coverage of Diana around when she died in the US tried to make it out like she was a commoner. Isn't she related to Churchill?
Well the commoner part is a big fat lie. She wore her family’s heirloom tiara - the Spencer tiara - on her wedding day. They’ve been titled aristocrats since the 16th century.
 
Well the commoner part is a big fat lie. She wore her family’s heirloom tiara - the Spencer tiara - on her wedding day. They’ve been titled aristocrats since the 16th century.
From our point of view they're all useless toffs, but actual royals (Duke level or higher) consider mere aristos (barons, earls, etc.) just filthy commoners as they are not of the royal blood.
 
I’d personally blame Diana more since she came from a background where she SHOULD know right from wrong when it comes to child rearing.
Wow, I completely disagree. Diana was an aristocrat with a capital A. The daughter of an Earl. She and her siblings dined in the nursery while her father ate alone in the splendid Althorp dining room. They were all cared for by occasionally abusive nannies and shipped off to boarding school.
 
Diana came from a very important and fucked up aristocratic family. I’m pretty sure her mom ran off when she was a kid. Her answer to that was to keep the boys away from their dad and be a BPD nightmare.
Her mother left her father for another man and there was an extremely long and embittered court case that left her father with sole custody. They almost never saw their mother. When the kids were grown and Diana’s brother was getting married, her father and stepmother wouldn’t even look at her mother or be civil. Diana read them the riot act over it.

She talked about all this in the “Diana tapes,” videos shot by her public speaking coach wherein she spills the beans on a LOT, including how “odd” her sex life with Charles was (he only wanted it once every three weeks). Bear in mind she made these confessions and it was only the second time they had ever met. The childhood part starts at 30 seconds in:


I would bet Meghan has studied these tapes extensively.
 
Wow, I completely disagree. Diana was an aristocrat with a capital A. The daughter of an Earl. She and her siblings dined in the nursery while her father ate alone in the splendid Althorp dining room. They were all cared for by occasionally abusive nannies and shipped off to boarding school.
Meh, I could be slightly off. I just seem to recall that she has a more modern/middleclass background than Charles.

Btw: I just love how the Farms, infamous stalking and tranny suicide site, has a forum tucked away in the back where folks can gossip about royals, Pooh-pooh Meghan’s culinary skills and talk about dresses.
 
And another thing about the wedding reception dress:
Queen Elizabeth had reportedly lent Meghan a diamond bracelet and matching earrings from Cartier to wear at the reception. The earrings were returned, but Meghan claimed she lost the bracelet. Charles paid the bill for that, IIRC.
 
And another thing about the wedding reception dress:
Queen Elizabeth had reportedly lent Meghan a diamond bracelet and matching earrings from Cartier to wear at the reception. The earrings were returned, but Meghan claimed she lost the bracelet. Charles paid the bill for that, IIRC.

She doesn't seem to be wearing a bracelet in any of the reception photos I'm seeing. 🤷‍♂️
 
Earrings and bracelet.
She may have taken it off before the reception, but the talk is the bracelet was never returned.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250404_133426_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20250404_133426_Chrome.jpg
    75.4 KB · Views: 93
  • Screenshot_20250404_133410_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20250404_133410_Chrome.jpg
    114.4 KB · Views: 90
Daily Mail’s royal editor Rebecca English says she got confirmation from a trusted source that Harry did indeed rage text Sophie Chandauka after she declined to defend Meghan to media. She reported this for the DM the other day but it’s sort of unprecedented for a royal rota editor to put her neck out like this about an active investigation. She would not have done so if she thought King Charles would mind terribly.
 
Shouldn't that kind of thing be insured? Against loss or theft.
Not necessarily. When you own so many extravagantly expensive things, the insurance rates aren't even worth it.

For example, fine art museums don't carry insurance on priceless artworks. It's more cost effective to invest in cameras, security personnel, and fire safing to prevent damage or loss. If the museums had to carry art insurance, they'd go bankrupt in a year.

So for a family who essentially lives in museums (none of the stuff belongs to anyone but the monarch, they just get to use it), they probably use the same system: cameras, fire safety, and guards.

There was also a rumor that Meghan's wedding tiara was a well made fake, because they were getting extremely nervous about her having sticky fingers.
 
Back