Megathread SRS and GRS surgeons and associated horrors - the medical community of experimental surgeons, the secret community of home butchers

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I looked into his older posts. he had complications because of course he did.

IMG_1162.jpeg
 
I looked into his older posts. he had complications because of course he did.

Holy shit, that is one Sarlacc mouth looking stinkditch!

Farting through his vagina… Kinda sounds like he could be an exhibit in the circus of the grotesque or something. Right next to the pooner bearded lady.

Good on the surgeon though for not wasting more time. Fecal matter in the stinkditch is a health issue. A stinkditch farting isn’t and should be filed under: “Well WTF did you expect?!”

Despite being dicked around by doctors who clearly couldn't give less of a shit about the blood this poon's bleeding, she still feels guilty for not trusting them as they are the ones "with degrees"
Very masc attitude from the lil dood! Trannies start yelling if you call them “Ma’am”. Pooners? They get medical malpracticed but “don’t want to be a bother!”

That other pooner? Fuck me man… Her nipple is falling off, and with it most of the erotic sensation, but she sounds like she just spilled some milk. “Whoopsies! Knew it could happen but it kinda sucks!”

FFS man..

Btw: Anyone else sees these chopped off tits and automatically see little silly faces?

Kinda like so:
IMG_1285.jpeg

Maybe I just watched too many cartoons as a kid or something, but top surgery results always make me chuckle because of it.
 
This one has a classic case of Obvious Pooner Scarring - I'm sure she's the envy of all the little Instagram doodlers who slap crap like this on any anime character they can find for clout from their fellow TiFs.
caseyaprilmayLink | Archive
Don’t people with Ehlers Danlos Syndrome heal poorly? Especially with scars and stuff. Why tf would any surgeon perform a surgery like this on someone with EDS?
Despite being dicked around by doctors who clearly couldn't give less of a shit about the blood this poon's bleeding, she still feels guilty for not trusting them as they are the ones "with degrees" - but still worries that her scar is not gonna "look pretty." Couldn't find her age, but she seems either young or supremely stupid.
No drains??? wtf?
 
Don’t people with Ehlers Danlos Syndrome heal poorly? Especially with scars and stuff. Why tf would any surgeon perform a surgery like this on someone with EDS?
Ehlers Danlos Syndrome, especially the hypermobile kind, is insanely popular with munchies right now. I just assume anyone who makes a big deal of it is faking. I feel kind of bad, because I know it's a real disease, but it's so rare and everyone I see online with it claims to have a million other disorders and has multiple sets of pronouns.

And no gender surgeon is gonna have doubts about carving some attention whore up.
 
It actually makes sense. It's not about psychology or even biology, just physics. The womb takes up a lot of space in the female (human and non-human mammals alike) and limits the size and angle of what can be inserted. The male pelvis is narrower but also deeper, and there's a lot of room in the male pelvic cavity/abdomen to shift things around.
There was an article somewhere interviewing a man with a 13 inch penis, and I don't know if it was Jonah Falcon or not, but he did say he was able to pleasure some women as he took his time with the foreplay and was able to adequately penetrate them. This guy banged both men and women and was in gay circuit parties when he was young due to his size. I wish I could remember the article. It is possible for certain women, but it absolutely cannot be done in under five minutes.

Thread tax: speaking of sizes, here is a paper on how long metoidioplasties get. It might have been posted already, but here is a refresher.
Twenty-seven patients underwent metoidioplasty from 2017–2022. Sixteen had recorded stretched clitoral length (pre-operatively) and exposed neophallus length (post-operatively). The median length of time on testosterone therapy was 4.6 years. The median stretched clitoral length was 5.8 cm, and exposed neophallus length was 6 cm. There was a strong correlation between pre-operative length and post-operative length (ρ=0.9; P<0.0001). There were no correlations between pre-operative length or exposed neophallus length and BMI (ρ=−0.02, P=0.93; ρ=0.05, P=0.83, respectively). Time on testosterone does not correlate with stretched clitoral length nor exposed neophallus length (ρ=−0.28, P=0.15; ρ=−0.35, P=0.18, respectively).

Conclusions​

Patients considering metoidioplasty often wonder how large their neophallus will be. We found that patients can expect exposed neophallus length to be about 0.6 cm longer than their pre-operative stretched clitoral length. No evidence of association of time on testosterone nor BMI with exposed neophallus length was found. This information is crucial for gender diverse patients to make informed decisions about gGAS.
Here is another, with pictures, discussing urethroplasty.
Methods: During the period of 14 years (from February 2006 to April 2020), 813 transmen with mean age of 24.4 years and mean body mass index of 24.6, underwent one stage metoidioplasty. Hysterectomy was simultaneously performed in 156, and mastectomy in 58 cases. Hysterectomy, mastectomy and metoidioplasty were done as a one-stage procedure in 46 transmen. Patients are divided in 5 groups, depending on the type of urethroplasty. Postoperative questionnaires were used to evaluate cosmetic and functional outcomes, as well as patients’ satisfaction.

Results: Follow-up ranged from 16 to 180 months (mean 94 months). Mean surgery time was 170 minutes and mean hospital stay was 3 days. Length of the neophallus ranged from 4.8 cm to 10.2 cm (mean 5.6 cm). Urethroplasty was complication-free in 89.5% of cases, and ranged between 81% to 90.3% in different groups. Urethral fistula and stricture occured in 8.85% and 1.70% of cases, respectively. Other complications included testicular implant rejection in 2%, testicular displacement in 3.20% and vaginal remnant in 9.60% of cases. From 655 patients who answered the questionnaire, 79% were totally satisfied and 20% mainly satisfied with the result of surgery. All patients reported voiding in standing position and good sexual arousal of the neophallus, without possibility for penetrative intercourse due to small size of the neophallus.

Conclusion:
Metoidioplasty has good cosmetic and functional outcomes, with low complication rate and high level of patients’ satisfaction. In transmen who request total phalloplasty after metoidioplasty, all available phalloplasty techniques are feasable.
Pictures are found in Figure 2.
 
Farting through his vagina… Kinda sounds like he could be an exhibit in the circus of the grotesque or something. Right next to the pooner bearded lady.

Holy shit, just got reminded of another famous tourist attraction from the holy land of troons: a ping pong show. And even this is obviously off limits for stinkditch owners because a female crevice is a surprisingly complex system in terms of musculature and innervation and whatnot, making it impossible to replicate. No Johnny, you won’t be able to let a parakeet fly out of a whatever medical miracle your preferred butcher concocted between your legs, you’ll be lucky if you’ll be able to piss without a cath and shit by yourself (obligatory hi to Fistulissa).

AFAIK though even the OG Thai ladyboys opt out of bottom surgery and that’s in a country known for the most skilled SRS surgeons, I wonder what they know that their Western counterparts don’t.
 
Question for the folx who know:

Why can't they do the teat yeet through the armpit and then figure out a way to gather and minimally remove the loose skin?

My understanding is that cancer surgery is maximally invasive because they need to get in there and get everything and they don't want loose tumor cells floating around.

However, boob jobs are minimally scarring, liposuction is minimally scarring, and skin removal surgery does leave scarring but not in a horror movie way, like they get shit lined up.

Why the hatchet job?
 
Question for the folx who know:

Why can't they do the teat yeet through the armpit and then figure out a way to gather and minimally remove the loose skin?

My understanding is that cancer surgery is maximally invasive because they need to get in there and get everything and they don't want loose tumor cells floating around.

However, boob jobs are minimally scarring, liposuction is minimally scarring, and skin removal surgery does leave scarring but not in a horror movie way, like they get shit lined up.

Why the hatchet job?
I think I've only seen "good" results when done on women with minimal boobage
 
Question for the folx who know:

Why can't they do the teat yeet through the armpit and then figure out a way to gather and minimally remove the loose skin?
There are less invasive procedures that leave minimal scaring. One of them is keyhole. Not sure if it’s through the armpit or not.

The problem is that you need to qualify for it. As in, you need to be thins and have small breasts. (Basically.)

Since most pooners are fat and pear shaped, they need to lob off the whole thing.

Also, many of them fetishize the scars. Like if you ever read pooner-lit (“gay” romances between a pooner and another man), there are often descriptions of the non pooner partner kissing the scars and shit like that.

They’re deeply disturbed people who make deeply disturbed choices.

I think I've only seen "good" results when done on women with minimal boobage
Even then it tends to look weird and unnatural, since (surprise!) men also have breast tissue, and aren’t flat in that creepy way pooners are.
 
Question for the folx who know:

Why can't they do the teat yeet through the armpit and then figure out a way to gather and minimally remove the loose skin?

My understanding is that cancer surgery is maximally invasive because they need to get in there and get everything and they don't want loose tumor cells floating around.

However, boob jobs are minimally scarring, liposuction is minimally scarring, and skin removal surgery does leave scarring but not in a horror movie way, like they get shit lined up.

Why the hatchet job?
They do something not entirely dissimilar with some women, but the biggest answer is just that it doesn't work well with larger breasts because of nipple placement and the amount of loose skin left behind. The "ideal" top turgery uses a sort of keyhole design that basically cuts a small bit of skin out from the middle and then pulls the sides together, leaving the nipple fully attached--but it only works on A/B cup size breasts.
 
Question for the folx who know:

Why can't they do the teat yeet through the armpit and then figure out a way to gather and minimally remove the loose skin?

My understanding is that cancer surgery is maximally invasive because they need to get in there and get everything and they don't want loose tumor cells floating around.

However, boob jobs are minimally scarring, liposuction is minimally scarring, and skin removal surgery does leave scarring but not in a horror movie way, like they get shit lined up.

Why the hatchet job?
Not a folk who knows for real but everything in a breast is very connected. At the very least, to the nipple. And scars from loose skin removal wouldn't look much prettier. I doubt one can reach inside and pull out the titty meat like removing a foam pad from a bra.

I finally looked up a video of how mastectomy works. With cancer, they apparently have to check the muscle underneath as well. Cartoon starts at 1:37

edited multiple times. drunk
 
Back