US Trump announces sweeping new tariffs to promote US manufacturing, risking inflation and trade wars - President Donald Trump declared on Wednesday a 10% baseline tax on imports from all countries

1743629549137.png

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump declared on Wednesday a 10% baseline tax on imports from all countries and higher tariff rates on dozens of nations that run trade surpluses with the United States, threatening to upend much of the architecture of the global economy and trigger broader trade wars.

Trump held up a chart while speaking at the White House, showing the United States would charge a 34% tax on imports from China, a 20% tax on imports from the European Union, 25% on South Korea, 24% on Japan and 32% on Taiwan.

The president used aggressive rhetoric to describe a global trade system that the United States helped to build after World War II, saying “our country has been looted, pillaged, raped, plundered” by other nations.

Trump declared a national economic emergency to launch the tariffs, expected to produce hundreds of billions in annual revenues. He has promised that factory jobs will return back to the United States as a result of the taxes, but his policies risk a sudden economic slowdown as consumers and businesses could face sharp price hikes on autos, clothes and other goods.

“Taxpayers have been ripped off for more than 50 years,” Trump said in remarks at the White House. “But it is not going to happen anymore.”

Trump was fulfilling a key campaign promise as he imposed what he called “reciprocal” tariffs on trade partners, acting without Congress through the 1977 International Emergency Powers Act in an extraordinary attempt to both break and ultimately reshape America’s trading relationship with the world.

The president’s higher rates would hit foreign entities that sell more goods to the United States than they buy, meaning the tariffs could stay in place for some time as the administration expects other nations to lower their tariffs and other barriers to trade that it says have led to a $1.2 trillion trade imbalance last year.

The tariffs follow similar recent announcements of 25% taxes on auto imports; levies against China, Canada and Mexico; and expanded trade penalties on steel and aluminum. Trump has also imposed tariffs on countries that import oil from Venezuela and he plans separate import taxes on pharmaceutical drugs, lumber, copper and computer chips.

None of the warning signs about a falling stock market or consumer sentiment turning morose have caused the administration to publicly second-guess its strategy, despite the risk of political backlash as voters in last year’s election said they wanted Trump to combat inflation.

Senior administration officials, who insisted on anonymity to preview the new tariffs with reporters ahead of Trump’s speech, said the taxes would raise hundreds of billions of dollars annually in revenues. They said the 10% baseline rate existed to help ensure compliance, while the higher rates were based on the trade deficits run with other nations and then halved to reach the numbers that Trump presented in the Rose Garden.

In a follow-up series of questions by The Associated Press, the White House could not say whether the tariff exemptions on imports worth $800 or less would remain in place, possibly shielding some imports from the new taxes.

Based on the possibility of broad tariffs that have been floated by some White House aides, most outside analyses by banks and think tanks see an economy tarnished by higher prices and stagnating growth.

Trump would be applying these tariffs on his own; he has ways of doing so without congressional approval. That makes it easy for Democratic lawmakers and policymakers to criticize the administration if the uncertainty expressed by businesses and declining consumer sentiment are signs of trouble to come.

Heather Boushey, a member of the Biden White House’s Council of Economic Advisers, noted that the less aggressive tariffs Trump imposed during his first term failed to stir the manufacturing renaissance he promised voters.

“We are not seeing indications of the boom that the president promised,” Boushey said. “It’s a failed strategy.”

Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash., said the tariffs are “part of the chaos and dysfunction” being generated across the Trump administration. The chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee stressed that Trump should not have the sole authority to raise taxes as he intends without getting lawmakers’ approval, saying that Republicans so far have been “blindly loyal.”

“The president shouldn’t be able to do that,” DelBene said. “This is a massive tax increase on American families, and it’s without a vote in Congress ... President Trump promised on the campaign trail that he would lower costs on day one. Now he says he doesn’t care if prices go up — he’s broken his promise.”

Even Republicans who trust Trump’s instincts have acknowledged that the tariffs could disrupt an economy with an otherwise healthy 4.1 % unemployment rate.

“We’ll see how it all develops,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. “It may be rocky in the beginning. But I think that this will make sense for Americans and help all Americans.”

Longtime trading partners are preparing their own countermeasures. Canada has imposed some in response to the 25% tariffs that Trump tied to the trafficking of fentanyl. The European Union, in response to the steel and aluminum tariffs, put taxes on 26 billion euros’ worth ($28 billion) of U.S. goods, including on bourbon, which prompted Trump to threaten a 200% tariff on European alcohol.

Many allies feel they have been reluctantly drawn into a confrontation by Trump, who routinely says America’s friends and foes have essentially ripped off the United States with a mix of tariffs and other trade barriers.

The flip side is that Americans also have the incomes to choose to buy designer gowns by French fashion houses and autos from German manufacturers, whereas World Bank data show the EU has lower incomes per capita than the U.S.

“Europe has not started this confrontation,” said European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. “We do not necessarily want to retaliate but, if it is necessary, we have a strong plan to retaliate and we will use it.”

Italy’s premier, Giorgia Meloni, on Wednesday reiterated her call to avoid an EU-US trade war, saying it would harm both sides and would have “heavy” consequences for her country’s economy.

Because Trump had hyped his tariffs without providing specifics until Wednesday, he provided a deeper sense of uncertainty for the world, a sign that the economic slowdown could possibly extend beyond U.S. borders to other nations that would see one person to blame.

Ray Sparnaay, general manager of JE Fixture & Tool, a Canadian tool and die business that sits across the Detroit River, said the uncertainty has crushed his company’s ability to make plans.

“There’s going to be tariffs implemented. We just don’t know at this point,” he said Monday. “That’s one of the biggest problems we’ve had probably the last — well, since November — is the uncertainty. It’s basically slowed all of our quoting processes, business that we hope to secure has been stalled.”

https://apnews.com/article/trump-tariffs-liberation-day-2a031b3c16120a5672a6ddd01da09933 (Archive)
 
Realistically, how do you expect America to meet the demand that China & similar countries have been able to meet for raw materials and low-quality goods while producing quality jobs with decent benefits domestically when China, for example, has the equivalent of the US population working for pocket change and belly button lint? Do you think we’re gonna have 10,000 seamstresses earning $30 an hour making SHEIN dresses? Or are we expecting people to surrender their freedoms and serve as niggercattle, pulling 16 hour shifts?
We have a giant fucking landmass full of resources and hundreds of millions of people and a population not yet third-worlded out. Prices will go up, which will incentivize domestic manufacturing. Life will be briefly worse and then much better in the long term. You are arguing for sustaining a failing system by using third-world slave labor where you don't have to see it.

America is a service economy
That is the problem.
 
We have a giant fucking landmass full of resources and hundreds of millions of people and a population not yet third-worlded out. Prices will go up, which will incentivize domestic manufacturing. Life will be briefly worse and then much better in the long term. You are arguing for sustaining a failing system by using third-world slave labor where you don't have to see it.
You know, for a bunch of people complaining about the lifestyle of chinese bugmen all the time, you're really eager to replicate that.
 
We have a giant fucking landmass full of resources and hundreds of millions of people and a population not yet third-worlded out. Prices will go up, which will incentivize domestic manufacturing. Life will be briefly worse and then much better in the long term. You are arguing for sustaining a failing system by using third-world slave labor where you don't have to see it.


That is the problem.
You think factories will come back and they will NOT. For sure, to be certain some certainly will; but the overwhelming vast majority simply will not.

If you make nails for a living; you may open a factory here and sell to a pure USA market but you’ll never be able to export; and if other places globally have global scale of operations they may still beat you in price even with tariffs. So while the world builds their roads, houses and businesses for half the cost, we fall behind because it costs us twice as much to build.

I admire the desire; but the world we live in and the global economy we created to allow American companies to globally export is our creation and we’re trying to kill our own son
 
You think factories will come back and they will NOT. For sure, to be certain some certainly will; but the overwhelming vast majority simply will not.

If you make nails for a living; you may open a factory here and sell to a pure USA market but you’ll never be able to export; and if other places globally have global scale of operations they may still beat you in price even with tariffs. So while the world builds their roads, houses and businesses for half the cost, we fall behind because it costs us twice as much to build.

I admire the desire; but the world we live in and the global economy we created to allow American companies to globally export is our creation and we’re trying to kill our own son
India can build their roads out of whatever fortified shit they manage to come up with. Who cares what they do? We could do a lot worse as Americans than having everything our houses are made of be made in America by Americans. This is called "retaining value in your economy" rather than "subsidizing foreign economies." We are not a small island nation lacking for resources, nor a third-world backwater with too low an IQ and work ethic to do anything. Give people a profit incentive and cut the red tape, watch those factories spawn in. Fifty years of offshoring damage could be undone in another fifty years, rather than never. America could have actual careers again other than programmer, lobbyist, drill rapper.
 
@More AWS-8Q Than You , it’s not letting me reply for some reason.

Based off logic. Do you think that we’re going to be able to produce materials as effectively & cost-efficient as China when they have 10x the workforce as indentured servitude, living in actual fucking cages getting paid 4¢ for each SHEIN dress they put together, when their American counterparts are looking to make $25 an hour with medical for the same job? It’s not going to happen. Math isn’t going to stop existing and make the big number smaller than the small number.

The rust belters aren’t going to be saved by manufacturing refrigerator parts; they’re going to be mistreated and underpaid for greater profits by the same people backing your guy. You think these other billionaires are investing so much money because they just love America that much? No, they’re investing money because they know how this will play out and are hoping to cash out on their new crop of quasi-slaves.

You’re arguing completely based off emotion, and Trump’s done a very good job of playing into this jingoistic sentiment and fool you all into believing he’s your guy, when in fact, he would sell you to the Chinese in a heartbeat if it benefitted him. He’s a celebrity politician billionaire, literally the 0.1% of the 0.1% and you guys think he’s a midwestern folk hero because he called Hilary a retard nine years ago.
 
You’re arguing completely based off emotion, and Trump’s done a very good job of playing into this jingoistic sentiment and fool you all into believing he’s your guy, when in fact, he would sell you to the Chinese in a heartbeat if it benefitted him. He’s a celebrity politician billionaire, literally the 0.1% of the 0.1% and you guys think he’s a midwestern folk hero because he called Hilary a retard nine years ago.
No, smooth brain, I'm not arguing off emotion. Japan has a 778% tariff on American rice, to protect their own rice industry, because we can make quality rice on a far larger scale than they can. The point of tariffs is to even out those comparative advantages, if China games the system with slave labor, you increase the tariffs until you remove that advantage. Also, COVID demonstrated the incredible vulnerability of Just-In-Time logistics and putting all your eggs in one basket and there's been a move towards reshoring industry because of it. Did you know the Chinese produce 97% of the pharmaceuticals that the US uses? Beyond Green Line Goes Up, there's strategic and geopolitical reasons to get away from that and make sure critical industries are in America instead of in a geopolitical rival that never acts in good faith and is one bad rainy season or missile strike away from going back to a third world country. There's a reason Russia's weathered the sanctions put on as well as it has, and that's because they produce the strategic resources they need internally, like steel. Most nations subsidize their steel industries because it is a vital, strategic resource. Also it's not just the manufacturing industries coming back, it's all the other supporting industries too, down to the lunch truck guy. I work in manufacturing, bringing it back isn't just jobs for guys on the line, there's all the supporting staff too.

If the all the world did free trade, then maybe this wouldn't be so bad, but the problem is that America went hard into Free Trade and no one else did, so we got fucked. Would also probably help the Venn diagram of people hating on tariffs wasn't a circle with people who are always horribly wrong and the same people telling middle Americans to learn to code. All y'all have pissed off the Jacksonian Middle Americans who then elected a Jacksonian administration, should have just let them grill in peace, because Crashing the Plane With No Survivors is always an option on the table for us.
 
Chinese manufacturers pay their unskilled laborers $2 a day. A shitty toy car made in China that once cost $1 now costs $1.50.

America manufactures that same exact shitty toy car, but they pay their unskilled laborers $20 an hour. That same toy car in America is $5.

In this reality that you've somehow been sold on, the American consumer will 100% pay more for the same product because for some reason we believe that the factories will 'save the West'. Realistically, one of two things happens: the average American consumer cuts their spending in half, choosing to save up money to buy a lower quantity of American products (which will still have a chance of being the same quality as Chinese products) instead of foreign imports (which will probably still be cheaper than domestic, despite the tariffs), or you create a new class of serfs that are worked to the bone to supply demands. Hint: the first is not happening.
Or in the USA because we aren't dumb we invent a machine that lets that laborer churn out eleven cars for every car that Chinese laborer makes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_system_of_manufacturing
The USA got its start in manufacturing not because we had a surplus of unskilled workers but because we had an educated, trained workforce that could and did make extensive use of labor-saving devices to allow for massive per-worker outputs. There is zero reason we cannot return to that.
 
These tariffs have shown one thing for sure; there are two worlds, two schools of thought and two very opposing ideas in the west of how the world should be run. How long can the divide continue before we tear ourselves apart?
 
Or in the USA because we aren't dumb we invent a machine that lets that laborer churn out eleven cars for every car that Chinese laborer makes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_system_of_manufacturing
The USA got its start in manufacturing not because we had a surplus of unskilled workers but because we had an educated, trained workforce that could and did make extensive use of labor-saving devices to allow for massive per-worker outputs. There is zero reason we cannot return to that.
Replaced by bugmen or machine, wow what a choice
 
Realistically, how do you expect America to meet the demand that China & similar countries have been able to meet for raw materials and low-quality goods while producing quality jobs with decent benefits domestically when China, for example, has the equivalent of the US population working for pocket change and belly button lint? Do you think we’re gonna have 10,000 seamstresses earning $30 an hour making SHEIN dresses? Or are we expecting people to surrender their freedoms and serve as niggercattle, pulling 16 hour shifts?
I expect Americans to work for themselves and to own their own productive capital. Ours should be a nation of mostly small businesses that buy and sell locally. Better for the environment, better for the average American.

Perpetuating a state of affairs where the vast majority of the American people are employed by someone else is part of why our freedoms are being eroded. "Do what we say or we'll come for your job" is a lot harder to pull off when you own your own business that sells primarily to those around you.

America is a service economy
Remember kids. Service and Servant share an etymologic root
 
I expect Americans to work for themselves and to own their own productive capital. Ours should be a nation of mostly small businesses that buy and sell locally. Better for the environment, better for the average American.

Perpetuating a state of affairs where the vast majority of the American people are employed by someone else is part of why our freedoms are being eroded. "Do what we say or we'll come for your job" is a lot harder to pull off when you own your own business that sells primarily to those around you.
If you wanted to be entirely dependent on the government to keep you alive, just apply for welfare, less steps that way.
 
Golden age of America has begun.

Immediately every single idle factories are adding new shift and adding more employees. Potential for manufacturing job growth is upto a million by year end. Plus other attached jobs and industries.

This is just the beginning.View attachment 7177259
I find it hard to believe there are only around 30k part time workers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: babadook
If you wanted to be entirely dependent on the government to keep you alive, just apply for welfare, less steps that way.
You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding about what it is I want. I could further elaborate for your benefit but in this case I'd rather just call you a dumb faggot and move on with my day
 
You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding about what it is I want. I could further elaborate for your benefit but in this case I'd rather just call you a dumb faggot and move on with my day
I can translate smooth brain, sadly. He's like that one meme, he doesn't want solutions, he just wants to be mad. Eventually, he'll be right about something and he can say "see, I told you so." It's the only way he can feel anymore.
 
Back