claudiuspt0lemy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2021
Why does Josh consistently go after people who might be able to help him. Every time someone has a fuck up, regardless of how big or small of a story it is, you talk about it, which is your right and I am not even saying you shouldn't, but you always go so hard and don't keep you tongue under check, which pisses off these people's egos. You're constantly upset that nobody has your back and that people ignore you and that nobody is in your corner, that nobody will give you the benefit of the doubt, yet I have watched your podcast every week since COVID and I have watched you repeatedly give zero deference or even the smallest hint of mercy or even mention thinking about giving someone the benefit of the doubt. That's not even getting into the fact that a lot of the time when you talk about these people you usually don't even have the full story or you're half remembering it, so not only are you going full bore ready to verbally level people and harshly criticize them, but you also do it half cocked because you don't know the full story or mix up details so you just look like a complete ignorant retard and these people will see what you have to say because you are a prominent public figure. Basically you're a loud ignorant nigger most of the time and then decry why the world won't help you. This isn't even mentioning how you piss off the fans of these people in turn because it looks like you're either ignorant or deliberately misreporting and then never go back to correct yourself unless called out mid-stream.
This annoys me because I support your movement and have bought merch, donated, hell I am studying to be a network professional partly because of you, and desperately want USIPS to be a success and to make positive changes that I want to see enacted into the world and I think you have the knowledge, know how, and under dog qualities that make for a good story. Yet you constantly antagonize people for no reason. For example, Rick Scott is not doing what you want and yeah he could obviously be doing better on debanking, yet you effectively call him an ignorant nigger on twitter and imply that he's good for nothing. What the fuck does that solve? Is he magically going to want to do what you want now that you've said all of this to him? Wouldn't a better option have been to maintain a diplomatic approach, especially with the person that likely has the most influence by far in the government on the very issue you are fighting so hard to fix? I understand that it must be incredibly frustrating to scream at the world that this is unfair and is destroying yours and other's livelihoods, but bad mouthing people and trying to berate them into doing what you want isn't going to work for you. It works for LFJ and other trannies/leftists/boomers because they're already a part of the institution or have some power granted to them as a member of minority group, or, in the case of boomers and budlite, there are simply too many of them for a company to ignore, whereas you are persona non grata in most Internet circles and most people are looking for any excuse to dismiss you out of hand, so why give them the easy win of being able to dismiss you outright?
I know you might say something to the effect "They already call me a racist nazi etc, and have hundreds of hours of voice clips to show that I am one and will in fact say that I am one" which fine, so am I, but if you're trying to make waves in polite society, you have to be able to watch what you say. You yourself know and understand that the 'real world' is not the Internet, yet you seem to treat it as such anyway.
I would qualify everything I have said until now by saying that I was actually very shocked and surprised by how cordially and nuanced your opinion/coverage on theQuarterings recent coffee fuckup was, though I worry this was more because he helped you with locals more than it was a genuine attempt at change. Anyway, I love your work, and I want to see you succeed, but I think you have a serious character flaw that is constantly working against you and the movement your are spearheading. The golden rule cuts both ways.
Note: No, I am not talking about Rekeita, Ralph, Fuentes or any other retarded lolcow nigger, nor am I an anime or vtubuer fan in any type of stripe (though I think it would do you credit to not immediately shout that a vtuber is a pedophile and anyone that watches anime/vtubers are somehow pedophiles or pedophile adjacent), nor am I any variation or type of angloid and I am white, so you can't dismiss my opinion so easily!
This annoys me because I support your movement and have bought merch, donated, hell I am studying to be a network professional partly because of you, and desperately want USIPS to be a success and to make positive changes that I want to see enacted into the world and I think you have the knowledge, know how, and under dog qualities that make for a good story. Yet you constantly antagonize people for no reason. For example, Rick Scott is not doing what you want and yeah he could obviously be doing better on debanking, yet you effectively call him an ignorant nigger on twitter and imply that he's good for nothing. What the fuck does that solve? Is he magically going to want to do what you want now that you've said all of this to him? Wouldn't a better option have been to maintain a diplomatic approach, especially with the person that likely has the most influence by far in the government on the very issue you are fighting so hard to fix? I understand that it must be incredibly frustrating to scream at the world that this is unfair and is destroying yours and other's livelihoods, but bad mouthing people and trying to berate them into doing what you want isn't going to work for you. It works for LFJ and other trannies/leftists/boomers because they're already a part of the institution or have some power granted to them as a member of minority group, or, in the case of boomers and budlite, there are simply too many of them for a company to ignore, whereas you are persona non grata in most Internet circles and most people are looking for any excuse to dismiss you out of hand, so why give them the easy win of being able to dismiss you outright?
I know you might say something to the effect "They already call me a racist nazi etc, and have hundreds of hours of voice clips to show that I am one and will in fact say that I am one" which fine, so am I, but if you're trying to make waves in polite society, you have to be able to watch what you say. You yourself know and understand that the 'real world' is not the Internet, yet you seem to treat it as such anyway.
I would qualify everything I have said until now by saying that I was actually very shocked and surprised by how cordially and nuanced your opinion/coverage on theQuarterings recent coffee fuckup was, though I worry this was more because he helped you with locals more than it was a genuine attempt at change. Anyway, I love your work, and I want to see you succeed, but I think you have a serious character flaw that is constantly working against you and the movement your are spearheading. The golden rule cuts both ways.
Note: No, I am not talking about Rekeita, Ralph, Fuentes or any other retarded lolcow nigger, nor am I an anime or vtubuer fan in any type of stripe (though I think it would do you credit to not immediately shout that a vtuber is a pedophile and anyone that watches anime/vtubers are somehow pedophiles or pedophile adjacent), nor am I any variation or type of angloid and I am white, so you can't dismiss my opinion so easily!
