US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Obama is not really akin to Trump. Trump can enjoy parody and is capable of self-parody. He’s literally called himself a prissy richboy faggot on SNL. Trump likes to be transparent, he likes doing press events. He’s had years to develop a public image and can be very candid under the spotlight.

Obama is manufactured. Most “moments” Obama had were a production and designed to flatter him. His way of speaking is the same, it’s supposed to sound important and didactic. Worse of all is that he has a bigger ego than Trump. Trump only ran because Obama decided that the White House Correspondents Dinner was to be a Blood Eagle for Trump being a critic of him.

@MirrorNoir knows more about this than I do. I imagine the departed Gehenna as well (RIP).
 
Last edited:
Can someone tell me why Russia and China are winning in the trade war yet America seems to be collapsing?
The only thing we trade with Russia is the oil that funds their adventure on the frontier. Why China would be a winner, as they import a massive amount of food & fuel, and their economy relies on the US to subsidize shipping costs to the US? Meanwhile Trump is up 6 points with Democrats.
 
Is that some common protest phrase, or was it a catchphrase distributed by the organizers?
View attachment 7181893
With the USAID money drying up, the protest organizers had to get creative. Hence why they're dipping into the "Get Autistic Shut Ins Out of the House" fund.
 
More Than 500 Law Firms Back Perkins Coie in Fight With Trump
The New York Times (archive.ph)
By Ben Protess
2025-04-04 21:22:48GMT
There are conspicuously very few "big law" firms on this list. I counted around 5 national firms I knew of. I saw Freshfields, which is a UK firms with offices in the US. The biggest and most profitable firms—almost all of them—are just waiting and playing possum. At the core of it, messing around with Trump is far worse for your bottom line than being a Twitter (or LinkedIn lmao) hero. Your big litigation client doesn't care about doing justice to Trump when it's their money and lawsuits that are being screwed with.

It's no doubt unconstitutional to bar them from federal buildings. There's a good Privileges and Immunities Clause argument going back to the Slaughterhouse Cases that the ability to freely come to government buildings, like federal courthouses, is a Privilege or Immunity under the Constitution. It could be extended to these other federal buildings.
 
BTW: in case people forgot this is the judge who called Trump a Dictator and Tyrant and donated 750K to the DNC in 2020 and is a director of a NGO whom will directly benefit from the FEMA money being released. But the RI appeals court ruled that of course there was no conflict of interest here.
That's nice. Now the judge can enforce it.

Oh wait, he can't? Huh, weird. Guess he can cry impotently then.

Man, who knew dealing with a corrupt judiciary was so simple? And weirdly similar to dealing with deranged Bluesky leftists.
 
It's no doubt unconstitutional to bar them from federal buildings. There's a good Privileges and Immunities Clause argument going back to the Slaughterhouse Cases that the ability to freely come to government buildings, like federal courthouses, is a Privilege or Immunity under the Constitution. It could be extended to these other federal buildings.
Oh, well. They fucked around and have entered the find out phase. I can spare no tears for these retards.
 
It's no doubt unconstitutional to bar them from federal buildings. There's a good Privileges and Immunities Clause argument going back to the Slaughterhouse Cases that the ability to freely come to government buildings, like federal courthouses, is a Privilege or Immunity under the Constitution. It could be extended to these other federal buildings.
Don't those only apply to people, of which Democrat lawyers are two categories removed from?

And I thought entering a building was a huge problem during J6?
 
More Than 500 Law Firms Back Perkins Coie in Fight With Trump
The New York Times (archive.ph)
By Ben Protess
2025-04-04 21:22:48GMT

The firms signed a legal brief supporting Perkins Coie, calling the president’s actions a threat “to the rule of law.” The largest firms declined to sign.
Hell yes, let's cut some throats, metaphorically..
 
Back