- Joined
- Mar 10, 2021
That's a pretty bold claim. Care to back it up with some evidence?The oldschoolcool (barely disguised porn sub) jannies are blatantly allowing referencing of cp for other users to find under a thread about traci lords.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's a pretty bold claim. Care to back it up with some evidence?The oldschoolcool (barely disguised porn sub) jannies are blatantly allowing referencing of cp for other users to find under a thread about traci lords.
At the very least post the link to the reddit page so we can go there to read comments/archive if you aren't going to archive the page yourself.The image showing the thing I want to show is my archive. You get what you get from me.
I found and archived the page they mentioned.That's a pretty bold claim. Care to back it up with some evidence?
90% of the comments are making fun of the OP for spelling her name "Tarci" and I only found one comment referencing a name of one of the movies she made when she was underage.That's a pretty bold claim. Care to back it up with some evidence?
Ovechkin is a Russian athlete, of course he isn’t going to come out and shit on Putin. Even if Ovechkin doesn’t like Putin, why would he take the risk of potentially being ostracized from his own country, or worse, killed, for saying otherwise? On top of that, why would he risk the NHL’s PR and relationship with Russian players by doing something like that? These people legitimately do not understand how any of this works.Ovechkin could personally donate 50 million to Ukrainian refugees and they’d still shriek that he’s a fascist.
Every time someone mentions him online it's Canadians shitting on him so they already hate him, but him not saying anything is the correct move as only terminally online people and Canadians are mad at the moment.“Why has Gretzky not come out and said he’s against Trump?”
I'm behind ITT but "I'm out $300" made me spit out my purple drank. His collection boils down to three hundred dollars - which basically means nothing after actual sold price, selling fees etc.
Quote from Wikipedia: "she quickly became the most sought after porn actress".she was 14 when she first faked her birth certificate
The reason they are calling her "tarci" is because there was a post not too long before that one (because I guess they need more posts of her) where the op made a typo. That one had a more explicit pic hence I did not link it.90% of the comments are making fun of the OP for spelling her name "Tarci" and I only found one comment referencing a name of one of the movies she made when she was underage.
It looks like those horrible tattoos people have on second life avatars.I'd say posting your plumber's crack on reddit is slaggier than the very slaggy tattoo, but yes that tattoo is extremely slaggy.
Amateur "suicide girls" are in the comments telling her to leave her man because this tattoo was OBVIOUSLY a good idea.
View attachment 7181729
The funny thing is that women with vibrators are more likely to make the nerves down under more numb after long term use. So in a sense, the dad is right but apparently majority of men don't find it strange for women to have them? I don't know if its true since I can't find anything about the survey itself other than it being quoted and not sourced in several articles.
Maybe that will get Trump to start talking about Gamergate.
I just think the price sperging on video games is weird, like the expectation for the last 30 years has basically been $50~70 but they're gonna have to go up with inflation too. Video games are still cheaper than they were in past generally, like an N64 game cost about $60 originally which would be like $120 today. Even PS1 games would have been like $80~100 adjusted for inflation.The switch 2 is actually more expensive in Europe, the games are 90 euro vs America's 80 usd
The price of video games has stayed the same but the price spent on video games has gone through the fucking roof due to microtransactions. So no sensible person wants the base price in the industry to go up as well, especially since the video game companies would take that as a sign to also start raising microtransaction prices.I just think the price sperging on video games is weird, like the expectation for the last 30 years has basically been $50~70 but they're gonna have to go up with inflation too. Video games are still cheaper than they were in past generally, like an N64 game cost about $60 originally which would be like $120 today. Even PS1 games would have been like $80~100 adjusted for inflation.
People should sperg about how there isn't as much price variability in new video games and somehow an absolutely massive game like GTA and a port of Taiko no Tatsujin can be the same price.
I guess I'll just say that if someone spends money on microtransactions in a game then they're a retard/one of those people that play Train Simulator 2024 and just have to pay $30 to play as Deutsche Bahn's ICE Sprinter.The price of video games has stayed the same but the price spent on video games has gone through the fucking roof due to microtransactions. So no sensible person wants the base price in the industry to go up as well, especially since the video game companies would take that as a sign to also start raising microtransaction prices.
Even as far back as 2020 almost 70% of the money spent on World of Warcraft, a game that famously originally didn't allow any microtransactions for the first few years as an ethical principle, is now not being spent on the game or its subscription fee, but on microtransactions.
Case study in Runescape, which is a game split into 2 versions:The price of video games has stayed the same but the price spent on video games has gone through the fucking roof due to microtransactions. So no sensible person wants the base price in the industry to go up as well, especially since the video game companies would take that as a sign to also start raising microtransaction prices.
Even as far back as 2020 almost 70% of the money spent on World of Warcraft, a game that famously originally didn't allow any microtransactions for the first few years as an ethical principle, is now not being spent on the game or its subscription fee, but on microtransactions.
I thought that was more because people are just actually nostalgic for old Runescape cause when Runescape came out it was probably one of the best games you could run from your browser which meant you could sneak it in at the school computer lab. Also it did have a free version, which the current one does now too, so anyone could at least play. Meanwhile Runescape 3 is basically just an extremely generic fantasy MMORPG and who the hell cares now?Case study in Runescape, which is a game split into 2 versions:
Old School Runescape - Most popular version of Runescape, has no microtransactions, only a monthly subscription fee.
Runescape 3 - Less popular version with about 1/4th the players as old school, but has microtransactions.
Guess which version is the one that makes more money