reddit General

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Last edited:
90% of the comments are making fun of the OP for spelling her name "Tarci" and I only found one comment referencing a name of one of the movies she made when she was underage.
comments.png
 
Ovechkin could personally donate 50 million to Ukrainian refugees and they’d still shriek that he’s a fascist.
Ovechkin is a Russian athlete, of course he isn’t going to come out and shit on Putin. Even if Ovechkin doesn’t like Putin, why would he take the risk of potentially being ostracized from his own country, or worse, killed, for saying otherwise? On top of that, why would he risk the NHL’s PR and relationship with Russian players by doing something like that? These people legitimately do not understand how any of this works.

“Why has Gretzky not come out and said he’s against Trump?”

Because he’s pretty much the patron saint of hockey to the point where #99 is de facto retired even at the lowest levels of play. I don’t even watch hockey and I know this. He knows that if he comes out and makes a bunch of political statements on either side he’s going to risk alienating a sizeablw portion of the massive amount of people who idolize him and hold up in their minds as the greatest player to ever play the sport. Look at what the NBA and LeBron James did a few years ago during covid/BLM stuff. There are still people nowadays who refuse to watch because of that political posturing.
 
Unrelated to Reddit but there's no chance the producers of the porno movies Traci Lords was in didn't know what was up. IIRC she was 14 when she first faked her birth certificate; I don't care how mature some teenagers can look, there's no way there wasn't willful ignorance that went into whoring her out for years before the FBI shut it down. Who knows, the whole ordeal could have been some kind of glowie op. We all know of the FBI's rocky history with CP.

Anyway it's not surprising Redditors would be able to recount the exact number of movies she was in.
 
I'm behind ITT but "I'm out $300" made me spit out my purple drank. His collection boils down to three hundred dollars - which basically means nothing after actual sold price, selling fees etc.

He used the word "betrayed" to describe a distant relative who slightly damaged the cardboard box on a toy. That is a shining example why you should never argue with a redditor. They will always be more emotionally invested than you and severely less intelligently invested.
 
90% of the comments are making fun of the OP for spelling her name "Tarci" and I only found one comment referencing a name of one of the movies she made when she was underage.
The reason they are calling her "tarci" is because there was a post not too long before that one (because I guess they need more posts of her) where the op made a typo. That one had a more explicit pic hence I did not link it.
 
I'd say posting your plumber's crack on reddit is slaggier than the very slaggy tattoo, but yes that tattoo is extremely slaggy.
Amateur "suicide girls" are in the comments telling her to leave her man because this tattoo was OBVIOUSLY a good idea.

View attachment 7181729
It looks like those horrible tattoos people have on second life avatars.
I've never played second life but I am sure people know what I mean right?
 
Maybe that will get Trump to start talking about Gamergate.

The switch 2 is actually more expensive in Europe, the games are 90 euro vs America's 80 usd
I just think the price sperging on video games is weird, like the expectation for the last 30 years has basically been $50~70 but they're gonna have to go up with inflation too. Video games are still cheaper than they were in past generally, like an N64 game cost about $60 originally which would be like $120 today. Even PS1 games would have been like $80~100 adjusted for inflation.

People should sperg about how there isn't as much price variability in new video games and somehow an absolutely massive game like GTA and a port of Taiko no Tatsujin can be the same price.
 
Last edited:
I just think the price sperging on video games is weird, like the expectation for the last 30 years has basically been $50~70 but they're gonna have to go up with inflation too. Video games are still cheaper than they were in past generally, like an N64 game cost about $60 originally which would be like $120 today. Even PS1 games would have been like $80~100 adjusted for inflation.

People should sperg about how there isn't as much price variability in new video games and somehow an absolutely massive game like GTA and a port of Taiko no Tatsujin can be the same price.
The price of video games has stayed the same but the price spent on video games has gone through the fucking roof due to microtransactions. So no sensible person wants the base price in the industry to go up as well, especially since the video game companies would take that as a sign to also start raising microtransaction prices.

Even as far back as 2020 almost 70% of the money spent on World of Warcraft, a game that famously originally didn't allow any microtransactions for the first few years as an ethical principle, is now not being spent on the game or its subscription fee, but on microtransactions.
 
The price of video games has stayed the same but the price spent on video games has gone through the fucking roof due to microtransactions. So no sensible person wants the base price in the industry to go up as well, especially since the video game companies would take that as a sign to also start raising microtransaction prices.

Even as far back as 2020 almost 70% of the money spent on World of Warcraft, a game that famously originally didn't allow any microtransactions for the first few years as an ethical principle, is now not being spent on the game or its subscription fee, but on microtransactions.
I guess I'll just say that if someone spends money on microtransactions in a game then they're a retard/one of those people that play Train Simulator 2024 and just have to pay $30 to play as Deutsche Bahn's ICE Sprinter.
 
The price of video games has stayed the same but the price spent on video games has gone through the fucking roof due to microtransactions. So no sensible person wants the base price in the industry to go up as well, especially since the video game companies would take that as a sign to also start raising microtransaction prices.

Even as far back as 2020 almost 70% of the money spent on World of Warcraft, a game that famously originally didn't allow any microtransactions for the first few years as an ethical principle, is now not being spent on the game or its subscription fee, but on microtransactions.
Case study in Runescape, which is a game split into 2 versions:
Old School Runescape - Most popular version of Runescape, has no microtransactions, only a monthly subscription fee.
Runescape 3 - Less popular version with about 1/4th the players as old school, but has microtransactions.
Guess which version is the one that makes more money
 
Case study in Runescape, which is a game split into 2 versions:
Old School Runescape - Most popular version of Runescape, has no microtransactions, only a monthly subscription fee.
Runescape 3 - Less popular version with about 1/4th the players as old school, but has microtransactions.
Guess which version is the one that makes more money
I thought that was more because people are just actually nostalgic for old Runescape cause when Runescape came out it was probably one of the best games you could run from your browser which meant you could sneak it in at the school computer lab. Also it did have a free version, which the current one does now too, so anyone could at least play. Meanwhile Runescape 3 is basically just an extremely generic fantasy MMORPG and who the hell cares now?

Counterpoint would be Fortnite and GTA Online which are basically microtransaction money printing machines.
 
Back