US Missing F-35 fighter jet disappears over South Carolina after pilot ejects in 'mishap' - The pilot parachuted over South Carolina but their fighter jet still hasn't been found by authorities. (Find my Iphone feature not enabled)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Missing F-35 fighter jet disappears over South Carolina after pilot ejects in 'mishap'


The United States Marine Corps has launched a full investigation after an F-35 fighter jet has gone missing after a plot ejected over South Carolina.

The pilot was in a Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort F-35 when the incident occurred on Sunday, according to a spokesperson for the Marine Corps.

The pilot ejected over North Charleston, South Carolina at around 2pm. He was taken to a local hospital where he was in stable condition, said Major Melanie Salinas. The pilot’s name has not been released.

Based on the missing plane’s location and trajectory, the search for the F-35 Lightning II jet was focused on Lake Moultrie and Lake Marion, said Senior Master Sgt. Heather Stanton at Joint Base Charleston. Both lakes are north of North Charleston.

A South Carolina Law Enforcement Division helicopter joined the search for the F-35 after some bad weather cleared in the area, Stanton said. Military officials appealed in online posts Sunday for any help from the public in locating the aircraft.
f3501.PNG
F-35 planeThe F-35 is manufactured by Lockheed Martin (Image: Getty)

Given that the pilot was engaging in a "military exercise" at the time of the disappearance of the F-35 fighter jet, speculation continues to abound about what, exactly, the pilots were doing in the area. Officials are still investigating why the pilot ejected, authorities said.

The pilot of a second F-35 returned safely to Joint Base Charleston, Salinas said. The planes and pilots were with the Marine Fighter Attack Training Squadron 501 based in Beaufort, not far from South Carolina’s Atlantic coast.

Officials have asked for the public's assistance in finding the downed jet, something which local Congresswoman Nacy Mace blasted on social media.

Joint Base Charleston said in a tweet: "We’re working with MCASBeaufortSC to locate an F-35 that was involved in a mishap this afternoon. The pilot ejected safely. If you have any information that may help our recovery teams locate the F-35, please call the Base Defense Operations Center at 843-963-3600."

Nancy Mace responded: "How in the hell do you lose an F-35? How is there not a tracking device and we’re asking the public to what, find a jet and turn it in?"
f3502.PNG
F-35 JetThe F-35 jet was still missing late Sunday afternoon (Image: Getty)

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info

Daily Express US has reached out to a representative for the United States Marine Corps for comment.

Officially known as the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, the missing fighter jet is part of a family of stealth multirole combat aircraft.

Considered one of the elite fighter jets, these stealth bombers are an essential tool of war for the American military.

Joint Base Charleston is a huge 20,000-acre base and shares space - including runways - with Charleston International.

Around 10,000 active service members live on the enormous base.

Follow our social media accounts here on facebook.com/ExpressUSNews and @expressusnews

(+)
Source : https://www.express.co.uk/news/us/1813898/breaking-marine-pilot-ejects-f35-charleston
 
This is why digitizing everything is dumb. Some things like instruments need to be at least have backup analog modes.
Steam gauges are dead on modern aircraft. Totally gone.

Some tech autists who worship the screen got rid of them in all new designs about 10-15 years ago.

Even the "get you home" panel is a screen now.
 
Wait a bomb or rocket went off? That caused the electronixs to glitch?
The plane was either struck by lightning or just suffered electric interference. When he pulled the ejector seat, it uses explosives to blow the canopy/windscreen off then blows the chair out. Most ejections are career enders just because of the physical toll they put on the body (his broken back and face full of shrapnel).
 
Last edited:
The plane was either struck by lightning or just suffered electric interference. When he pulled the ejector seat, it uses explosives to blow the canopy/windscreen off then blows the chair out. Most elections are career enders just because of the physical toll they put on the body (his broken back and face full of shrapnel).
But, you do get a snazzy Martin-Baker tie pin for the trouble.
 
Him being fired is tragic and pretty outrageous.
He actually resigned, but the fact he had serious career repercussions from this is kind of disgraceful when it was very clearly the government contractor and its defective products that were to blame. You could argue anyone involved with a disaster like this might, out of an abundance of caution, not actually pilot one of these planes again, but even then, that should not have reflected on his career prospects, effectively dead-ending his career and forcing him to resign.

I think it would have made more sense literally to put him in charge of a team figuring out how to fix this problem so it never happens again.

But that might reflect badly on Lockheed Martin and the Congressvermin that it owns.

I wouldn't be surprised if the code running on that tard helmet was written by some jeet pasting shit from stackexchange.
 
If he rode it into the ground due to spatial disorientation, they'd have blamed him for not ejecting.
Yep, that plane was headed for an uncontrolled impact no matter what, and if he was in it when it happened they'd have cited pilot error as the cause and blamed him for it.
The plane was either struck by lightning or just suffered electric interference. When he pulled the ejector seat, it uses explosives to blow the canopy/windscreen off then blows the chair out. Most ejections are career enders just because of the physical toll they put on the body (his broken back and face full of shrapnel).
Na, the human body can take the g forces of an ejection (12-14g's) since its over in just a few seconds, especially since fighter pilots regularly pull close to 9g's just doing standard dogfight training.
 
Na, the human body can take the g forces of an ejection (12-14g's) since its over in just a few seconds, especially since fighter pilots regularly pull close to 9g's just doing standard dogfight training.
There's always the possibility of severe injury, especially to the spinal cord due to the fact ejecting is linear compression along that axis.... and there's a hard limit to how many they'll let you have in your career before they stick you behind a desk because it's basically surviving an F1-tier racing crash every time you pull the handle.
 
Last edited:
There's always the possibility of severe injury, especially to the spinal cord due to the fact ejecting is linear compression along that axis.... and there's a hard limit to how many they'll let you have in your career before they stick you behind a desk because it's basically surviving a racing crash every time you pull the handle.
Yep, according to Wikipedia 20-40% chance for most Western models, worse if you're using a Russian one that hits your spine with 20g's.

But better a couple compressed vertebrae than a closed casket funeral.
 
Steam gauges are dead on modern aircraft. Totally gone.

Some tech autists who worship the screen got rid of them in all new designs about 10-15 years ago.

Even the "get you home" panel is a screen now.
Not the Russians right?
 
This is why digitizing everything is dumb. Some things like instruments need to be at least have backup analog modes.

Steam gauges are dead on modern aircraft. Totally gone.

Some tech autists who worship the screen got rid of them in all new designs about 10-15 years ago.

Even the "get you home" panel is a screen now.

It doesn't read as if the backup instrument at the bottom of the panel, which is a screen as mentioned, failed. It reads more like he lost his primary instruments and got disoriented. That's what his statement about a "falling sensation" tells me. You ignore stuff like that when flying on instruments because it's easy to "feel" wrong, that's primary flight training while under the hood stuff. Backup electromechanical ADI and mechanical altimeter or single instrument ESIS, they'll both be on their own backup power if whichever main or aux bus they're normally powered by fails. At the end of the day with the information presented, it does seem like the correct decision in this situation was likely to climb out of trouble on the backup display, head down, not look for the ground or horizon and punch out while disoriented.

Not the Russians right?

The Russians are still using 50 year old alloys stolen via espionage during the cold war in their turbines. I wouldn't trust a russian backup instrument any more than an american backup screen.
 
I meant the ejection.. sorry about how i worded it. Forgot about that part and added it at the last second.
All good, I got confused and thought I missed the cause for the failiure.

I still don't get why didn't they put a backup tracker on it. It was not flying over enemy territory.

20gs is a lot. My autism tells me it is there to make the pilot get clear of the tail wings or the explosion of a plane going off, or is that not it?
 
The Russians are still using 50 year old alloys stolen via espionage during the cold war in their turbines. I wouldn't trust a russian backup instrument any more than an american backup screen.
We beat you to the first nuclear power station, first satellite, first man in space, first woman in space, and first space walk, among other things. We didn't beat you to the moon because the manwhore who failed to send his cumdumpster to space (Tereshkova, an honorable woman, flew instead) sabotaged the manned flights program to spite Kamanin (which is a condemnation of the USSR -- so patriarchal a manwhore can rape a matter of national prestige -- but not of our science).

Mind you, in the 70s, Americans were no better than pajeets, in that rape was legal in every state until South Dakota gained sapience in 1975.

I'd trust 1970 Soviet tech over 1970 American Rapist tech or 2025 American troon tech.

(The lack of 2025 Russian tech is a testament to the (((greatness))) of capitalism and orthodox christfaggotry. Capitalist Russia's single achievement in space is sending a whore there, unfortunately it returned and is now prostituting her underage daughter.)
 
We beat you to the first nuclear power station
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyshtym_disaster
Yeah, the USSR had a lot of firsts when it came to nuclear power, and I'm sure the people who lived on the Techa River, downstream of Lake Karachay, were very proud of Mother Russia's scientific and technological achievements as they lay dying from chronic radiation sickness.
 
Back