Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 66 13.9%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 11.8%
  • This Year

    Votes: 74 15.6%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 163 34.3%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 116 24.4%

  • Total voters
    475
I should have specified that I expect Russ to try the same thing. I don't expect the same level of success.
And when that inevitably fails, he'll go for the appeals court that already told him he's the bestest most specialist boy ever with a true and honest case. And when that fails because even they can't tardguard that hard, he'll go for the Supreme Court.

Imagine this case ending up in front of Clarence FUCKING Thomas because Greer can't stop being a sperg, not because Null made a convincing case but because Greer keeps making retarded ones.
 
Only just caught up but wow was I ever wrong thinking it was going to be boring leading up to the hearing. Overall glad to see the magistrate finally doing his job. The reversal from "what's 7 months between litigants" to "sorry, deadline was a couple days ago" is a pretty incredible turnabout.

1743927177062.png

>On 11-19-24, a standard discovery protective order (SPO) was entered in this case.
>A SPO was entered into this case on 11-18-24.

It's a small thing but this jumped out at me immediately. I shouldn't be surprised by rustys shit filings but it is literally on the same page. Just :story:

Regarding the autism about Hardin filing motions before the hearing, all I have to say @obsdj is that judges are not robots and the legal system isn't a computer that runs laws with a deterministic output.

If someone schedules a meeting to discuss things and lists some things they intend to discuss that list is almost always not exhaustive such that nothing else will get discussed (even in court!). This is because getting everyone together is a hassle and once you've done that ignoring issues that need to be discussed because they were not on an initial list/agenda would be a waste of time (see: "judicial economy"). In the same vein not raising issues that could be discussed (because, again, the list is not exhaustive) only to raise them afterwords (even ignoring the potential to accidentally waive things) so that the issue could have been resolved but now necessitates another conference or whatever wastes everyone's time.

If you can't or won't understand this then you have terminal autism.

I think he'll complain, but this shit is so retarded there's nothing the District Judge could do that isn't textbook abuse of discretion.
Yeah he would never blatantly ignore a "shall" in a statute for fees and just pull a nice round number out of his ass. Because that would be textbook abuse of discretion.

Imagine this case ending up in front of Clarence FUCKING Thomas because Greer can't stop being a sperg, not because Null made a convincing case but because Greer keeps making retarded ones.
It was already nearly there. It would be funny if after getting asked for a response for an en banc hearing that didn't happen and getting denied cert it went all the way back up and got accepted.
 
Yeah he would never blatantly ignore a "shall" in a statute for fees and just pull a nice round number out of his ass. Because that would be textbook abuse of discretion.
putting aside the question of whether or not reducing the initial sanction was appropriate, part of the district judges reasoning was that it was rustys first sanction received in this case and hes just a poor pro se retard. i dont see that defense applying in any way to rustys potential objection this time. he was already told multiple times directly by both the magi and even the district judge himself that the protective order was not violated, any flailing of arms by rusty about this is per se a waste of the courts time which to the judge is an infinitely more serious infraction than "only" wasting nulls and hardins time.

in other words if rusty objects again and the district judge upholds it that would so far be the strongest piece of evidence that he is actively tard shielding and breaking his own rules to continue doing so.
 
putting aside the question of whether or not reducing the initial sanction was appropriate, part of the district judges reasoning was that it was rustys first sanction received in this case and hes just a poor pro se retard. i dont see that defense applying in any way to rustys potential objection this time. he was already told multiple times directly by both the magi and even the district judge himself that the protective order was not violated, any flailing of arms by rusty about this is per se a waste of the courts time which to the judge is an infinitely more serious infraction than "only" wasting nulls and hardins time.

in other words if rusty objects again and the district judge upholds it that would so far be the strongest piece of evidence that he is actively tard shielding and breaking his own rules to continue doing so.
I agree that the likely hood of an objection to the upcoming sanctions getting them reduced is near zero however that's only because the district judge will be annoyed by russholes antics. Not because he gives a single fuck about the rules &/or abusing his discretion and we should not pretend otherwise.
 
putting aside the question of whether or not reducing the initial sanction was appropriate, part of the district judges reasoning was that it was rustys first sanction received in this case and hes just a poor pro se retard.
That would be relevant to a Rule 11 sanction, but is completely irrelevant to a discovery sanction, which is supposed to be compensatory, not punitive.
 
I wonder if he'll keep threatening to 'bring more sanctions' now that his previous attempts (and 2 months of work) have led to nothing.
The Judge called him out on that. Pointing out that all his work was denied in 4 days. When he should have been instead answering matters already before the court before their deadlines passed. This had to have been one of the most Trauma Lump inducing rulings to land on Russel yet. I don't think even that first ruling for sanctions bruised him quite this badly.
 
The Judge called him out on that. Pointing out that all his work was denied in 4 days. When he should have been instead answering matters already before the court before their deadlines passed. This had to have been one of the most Trauma Lump inducing rulings to land on Russel yet. I don't think even that first ruling for sanctions bruised him quite this badly.

I'm expecting that he'll run crying to the district judge sometime this week or next. Greer has at least figured out that if mommy magistrate isn't tard guarding him hard enough, he can always try asking daddy district, who has a history of acquiescing if for no other reason than to make Russ go away. I'm surprised that the 10th circuit court hasn't been asked to weigh in on the matter of how Hardin violated an SPO that Greer hadn't even bothered to read, but perhaps Russ planned on getting to those after the judge excused his negligence is responding to other motions two weeks late as he's grown accustomed to doing.
 
She's already worried about being on his radar because of the predictable patterns of harassment, but the Judge has told her to shut the fuck up.
Greer's gonna quote this in his howling about the SPO, saying "It's clear Kiwifarms will harass my non-existent and dead witnesses because Greer is going to harass the fuck out of this whore."
 
Greer is going to harass the fuck out of this whore.
That was my line of thinking too.

The reason he's sperging so hard about his witnesses' information being available in public filings is because he's ape-brained enough to see somebody's name and start hounding them because they're literally scaring the hoes away (the irony is not lost on me).
 
Back