Also what kind of anarchist is he?
The kind who thinks the "state withering away" was literal and not a metaphor for when the state eliminates all disagreement through force.
Marx (and Engels) on how the revolution goes:
1. The state seizes control of everything and has absolute power.
2. The state eliminates all opposition.
3. The state becomes unnecessary because everyone completely agrees on everything, since it's unnecessary society no longer tasks anyone with those functions.
The Leninist divergence is that Lenin said "that sounds implausible" and edited 3 to:
3. The state forever polices for wreckers and saboteurs.
Which Mao tweaked to "permanent revolution" which basically just meant Mao would order people to do random chaos when he got bored.
Online anarcho-communists like Kevin and the Tranch "read" (not really) Marx as saying:
1. The state seizes control of everything and has absolute power.
2. ?
3. Utopia.
In reality, Kevin like most of these people is "anarchist" because he thinks that means nobody can tell you what to do (aka parents) and is "communist" because he thinks that means everyone else is required to be his slave (aka parents). About the only actual communist thing he does is bitterly seethe about everyone, write a bunch of drivel, parrot what "elites" tell him to and apologize for falling out of step with the Party.