2) Minnesota as anti-SLAPP now. You may want to think about that before thinking about a defamation action against anyone. Drug addicts whose young children test positive for drug use don't usually do well trying to defend their good name in front of a jury. A jury might also tend to think that a guy who fucked your wife and did drugs for a long time with you might be competent to be able to conclude if you are doing drugs again. And if you bring the action in your home county, the judge in the case would either be judge "pussy liquor" who you have insulted, the judge who is about to sentence you on drug charges or the third judge which is the only one you have not been in front of yet.
Nevermind this fucking drugged out idiot has showed up repeatedly on other people's streams obviously wasted out of his gourd, gibbering, babbling and twitching like a goddamn lunatic, meth mouthing it and displaying pretty much every symptom of a blatant junkie.
I hope he does it, though. This faggot has already helped lose a gargantuan anti-SLAPP loss for Vic and lost his own bizarre, desperate and extremely expensive attempt to import an anti-SLAPP statute from another state even though falsely calling someone a child molester wouldn't even pass anti-SLAPP muster.
He should complete the hat trick and lose an anti-SLAPP in his own failed lolsuit now that Minnesota actually has an anti-SLAPP.
I'd love to see him get assfucked with SLAPP for a third time.
Fuck that fucking faggot until he prolapses.
You sure that hasn't happened already? Pretty sure they call him "Ol' Wizard Sleeve" in Jamaica.
You might've misread what I said. I was agreeing that with what Nick might've done with hacking Aaron to break A-C privilege to give it to other people and try to intimidate/humiliate Aaron into silence, he absolutely should be disbarred for it.
I was agreeing with you on that. Minnesota is really lenient on actual disbarment, though. I could easily see them doing something like a suspension with reinstatement terms so onerous Nick would never do them. It actually is in the territory where disbarment could be a thing, I'd just never actually bet on that.
I suspect Aaron is confusing "taking a report" with investigating.
So if they're just taking a report, why are they (assuming he's telling the truth) asking him about tons of people, some of whom he's never even heard of?
Doesn't mean they'll do anything necessarily, but it sounds like a lot more than "taking a report."
