Katholic Kiwi Kathedral (Catholocism General) - Byzantine? Ethnic? Roman? It doesn't matter. It's a place for Catholic Kiwis to discuss Catholicism and inquirers to inquire

Who is the best Catholic apologist alive today?

  • Bishop Robert Barron

    Votes: 43 48.3%
  • Fr. Mike Schmitz

    Votes: 39 43.8%
  • Trent Horn

    Votes: 23 25.8%
  • Jimmy Akin

    Votes: 14 15.7%
  • Joe Heschmeyer

    Votes: 2 2.2%
  • Matt Fradd

    Votes: 6 6.7%
  • Scott Hahn

    Votes: 13 14.6%
  • Brayden Cook - TheCatechumen

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Taylor Marshall

    Votes: 3 3.4%
  • Christian Fagner

    Votes: 3 3.4%
  • James White

    Votes: 7 7.9%

  • Total voters
    89
Don't let the Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Oneness Pentecostals, and other non-Trinitarians heard you say that.
>Don’t let white Muslims, small pox enjoyers, babblers and other heretics hear you say that

All joking aside, I see now why their were whole councils convened to nail down the wording used to describe Jesus and the trinity
 
Bl. Pope Pius IX blesses his troops for the last time
IMG_2523.jpeg
 
Hello! I have a weird(?) question about bible translations. Please bear with me because I wasn't raised religious.

I was going through old books in the house recently, and came across two bibles that claim to be catholic. My agnostic parents (both raised catholic) held on to them because of family obligations. But they both have differing translations. The older looking one says King James Version and the other one is NIV. Which one is closer to the ones Catholics use? Does it even matter in the end?
 
Hello! I have a weird(?) question about bible translations. Please bear with me because I wasn't raised religious.

I was going through old books in the house recently, and came across two bibles that claim to be catholic. My agnostic parents (both raised catholic) held on to them because of family obligations. But they both have differing translations. The older looking one says King James Version and the other one is NIV. Which one is closer to the ones Catholics use? Does it even matter in the end?
Both aren't Catholic translations per say, but if you want a Catholic Bible the USCCB has a list of approved translations.


My Bible is the New American Bible Revised Edition which is the standard bible for most of the English-speaking world. There's also the Douay Rheims translation which is pretty good but it's a Early Modern English translation so I wouldn't recommend it for first timers. It doesn't matter much but one of the major differences Catholic Bibles and Protestant Bible is the Deuterocanonical books that the Protestant versions lack.
 
Last edited:
Hello! I have a weird(?) question about bible translations. Please bear with me because I wasn't raised religious.

I was going through old books in the house recently, and came across two bibles that claim to be catholic. My agnostic parents (both raised catholic) held on to them because of family obligations. But they both have differing translations. The older looking one says King James Version and the other one is NIV. Which one is closer to the ones Catholics use? Does it even matter in the end?
the NIV version is the catholic version, at least that is what ive always been taught. which is hilarious, when prots go off about how catholics have their "own bible", we dont.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: AnsemSoD1
It is because the world Crawford wants is essentially Catholic, shaped not by the presumption of human depravity and vice—which is the Protestant form—but by the revelation that, through grace, all of humanity really is capable of virtue. This is the unshakeable optimism guarded by the Catholic Church: Christ frees us from the law and its bonds, because, in becoming one with Christ in His Church, man is restored in his capacity as a lawmaker. Freed from sin, he can freely and creatively choose the good. As a member of the Church, which is a real, physical Body, he does not simply wait for a spiritual, heavenly future in which he will be made virtuous, but rather, he receives the grace—in the real, physical sacraments of the Church—that makes it possible for him to be an excellent person, and so an excellent driver.

….

the Catholic faith that actually allows for social self-governance, precisely because it affirms us as a people most fundamentally made for each other, for unity in “one Lord, one Faith, one Baptism.” If we can be trusted with anything, it is to govern ourselves according to this most fundamental ground of our nature

 
There’s a Byzantine Catholic pretty close from my house that I’ve never gone to before, I’ll probably go there for mass after Lent is Over, is their anything I should know before going? I know their in communion with Rome but I still want to be respectful to their Traditions/customs
 
There’s a Byzantine Catholic pretty close from my house that I’ve never gone to before, I’ll probably go there for mass after Lent is Over, is their anything I should know before going? I know their in communion with Rome but I still want to be respectful to their Traditions/customs
The Greek immigrants over there will probably give you the weird eye either way. IMO less libtard oriented Catholics are generally better serving the Church in their local parishes and transforming them bit by bit.
 
Hello! I have a weird(?) question about bible translations. Please bear with me because I wasn't raised religious.

I was going through old books in the house recently, and came across two bibles that claim to be catholic. My agnostic parents (both raised catholic) held on to them because of family obligations. But they both have differing translations. The older looking one says King James Version and the other one is NIV. Which one is closer to the ones Catholics use? Does it even matter in the end?
Adding to what others have already said - the Knox translation was primed to be the go-to modern English bible in the Catholic Church before the faggots took over in the 60's. It's basically a retranslation of the Douay Rheims bible. Very readable. I believe Baronius Press still publishes it.

As to whether it matters, just look up the Scofield bible sometime. There are strong and weak translations out there, and then there are actively pernicious ones.
 
Last edited:
The Greek immigrants over there will probably give you the weird eye either way. IMO less libtard oriented Catholics are generally better serving the Church in their local parishes and transforming them bit by bit.
I’m more so curious than anything else. I re-affirm that the Novus Ordo is a true and beautiful formation of the mass, God exists in every rite within the umbrella of the Church no matter the culture or language and I find that very beautiful and would like to fully appreciate it.
 
Hello! I have a weird(?) question about bible translations. Please bear with me because I wasn't raised religious.

I was going through old books in the house recently, and came across two bibles that claim to be catholic. My agnostic parents (both raised catholic) held on to them because of family obligations. But they both have differing translations. The older looking one says King James Version and the other one is NIV. Which one is closer to the ones Catholics use? Does it even matter in the end?
The KJV is definitely not Catholic, I'm not sure why any Bible in that translation would be labeled as such. The NIV is not traditionally Catholic either.

I am a big fan of the Douay-Rheims because I like the old prose, but for something a bit more updated I go for the Revised Standard Version Second Catholic Edition, or RSVSCE. Take note that this is not the New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition, or NRSV-CE. The NRSV in general has "inclusive" stylistic choices I do not like.

This article might explain more for you: https://www.catholic.com/tract/bible-translations-guide
 
Hello! I have a weird(?) question about bible translations. Please bear with me because I wasn't raised religious.

I was going through old books in the house recently, and came across two bibles that claim to be catholic. My agnostic parents (both raised catholic) held on to them because of family obligations. But they both have differing translations. The older looking one says King James Version and the other one is NIV. Which one is closer to the ones Catholics use? Does it even matter in the end?
I know this is the catholic thread and I'm protestant, but I can help you on this one.

KJV is Anglican/Presbyterian, and the NIV is a more modern translation from the mid 20th century to try and remove the thee's and thou's for the purpose of bringing the bible in a more readable modern english, and is used by the a few of the more mainline protestant denominations, like the methodist and some branches of Presbyterians.

Neither are Roman Catholic, and I would guess your family had either Methodists or Presbyterians in at some point. For a list of wahts more in line with the RC church, go with Preachers list.
 
There’s a Byzantine Catholic pretty close from my house that I’ve never gone to before, I’ll probably go there for mass after Lent is Over, is their anything I should know before going? I know their in communion with Rome but I still want to be respectful to their Traditions/customs
One thing to know about Byzantine Catholics is how the Eucharist is received. While the Roman Catholic churches either give the Body via placing it on the tongue or in the hands of the recipient as an unleavened wafer with the Blood being received with the recipient taking a sip from the chalice, the Byzantines use a leavened bread as the host dipped in wine and distributed via a spoon into the mouth. I actually went to a Byzantine mass with my mother when my family went up to Virginia a few years ago. It was a very nice experience.
 
Would love to hear your take on Vatican II, since that led to a dramatic shift in what is and isn't Catholic Orthodoxy. Although I'm not Catholic, a few that I've discussed theology with are pretty adamant that the Church was hijacked in 1958 and is no longer the real Church.

Although I'm aware that sedevanctists are definitely in the minority, you have to admit that claiming to be the one and only true way, the O.G. form of Christianity doesn't exactly fit well with how different the Catholic Church is before and since Vatican II. The gradual shift since then towards acceptance of things like homosexuality, abortion etc sort of lends credence to that idea, from an outsiders perspective..

When I've asked this before, most mainstream Catholics try to handwave it away, but the ones I know that are most steeped in Church history and their beliefs feel quite differently.
I definitely think that shit like the Schofield Bible has been EXTREMELY fucking harmful to both the Church and Christianity as a whole, with the Jew worship genuinely being insane, especially from the Boomers and Gen Xers.
 
🚨🚨🚨 FAGNER MELTDOWN 🚨🚨🚨 FAGNER MELTDOWN 🚨🚨🚨
View attachment 7194118
Was bound to happen.
I’ve watched a couple of his videos and debates and he seems to be pretty knowledgeable but present pretty poor arguments sometimes. Isn’t he also a groyper?
From what I recall, he's a convert. He's one of those autisticly "giften" bookworms who process a lot of info. But one, he's a convert, which means it takes your whole world view to get adjusted to a new reality, which doesn't always work out, se Taylor Marshal. And two, he's young and autistic, and evidently an internet meme enjoyer, which makes him cringe and unhinged.
A while back he went after Jimmy Akin and apparently even had a good argument. But he went about it like a young autistic memeboi would and Jimmy made a short reply that he's a good kid, but a kid nonetheless. Some say Jimmy should have went to some lengths and debate the boy, but I think Jimmy did the wise thing, saw he was dealing with a kid, told him as much and walked away without causing any needless heat.
 
Isn’t he also a groyper?
He's in the closet about it because optics (despite it being painfully obvious).

Most people around are quick to realize he's the kind of person nothing good can come out of associating with, which doesn't preclude the extreme internet exposure antics from being extremely funny. I think the lack of wisdom and the pathetic nerd disposition combine with unparalleled access to Church documents to make for quite the clown show, and him and his inner circle have made this routine of seething over random Catholic Answers stuff for quite a while now.

Definitely not looking forward to watching the damage these niche micro-celebrities cause to young people though, I hope people like Trent Horn and Akin get around mentoring younger guys, preferably without the emotional imbalances and spastic behavior of these 20 something Twitter e-theologians.
 
Back