Liz Fong-Jones / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
What does it say that Elliot is wealthy and poly and all of his partners are notably ugly, even by troon standards?
  • Charitable: He’s not superficial. (Lol, Doubt it.)
  • Less charitable: Eunuchs don’t give a fuck about appearance. They’re in prison gay relationships anyhow.
  • Probably true: He’s so insufferable, ugly, and has such fucked up kinks that no amount of money is a motivator and this is the best he can do.
 
What does it say that Elliot is wealthy and poly and all of his partners are notably ugly, even by troon standards?
  • Charitable: He’s not superficial. (Lol, Doubt it.)
  • Less charitable: Eunuchs don’t give a fuck about appearance. They’re in prison gay relationships anyhow.
  • Probably true: He’s so insufferable, ugly, and has such fucked up kinks that no amount of money is a motivator and this is the best he can do.
Deranged: it's not about looks it's entirely based on who is into the exact set of absurd kinks LFJ is
 
What does it say that Elliot is wealthy and poly and all of his partners are notably ugly, even by troon standards?
Probably a power differential. I bet the common thread is that all of his partners are easy to control, and won't speak up to contradict him.

You can see the control freak behind the sexual freak in the way Elliot lines up his attacks. He always moves from a position of strength, using threats instead of actual pleas for morality. He has a perfectly crafted web of justifications for everything he does, from editing Wikipedia to leveraging corporate connections to justifying rape consent accidents. His BDSM evangelism isn't related to beauty or intimacy, it's just another set of rules and structure for him to obsess over.

Elliot doesn't care if someone tells him no. When they do, he beats everyone around them with his framework of definitions and descriptions and rules, until they comply. Whatever his hellish personal life is like, I bet it's the same pattern: partners assigned to strict roles, who get verbally beaten into following Elliot's rules. And if they don't all the other people around them get harassed until they comply.

Continuing this assumption, his faux-weary disclosure about the consent accident was likely about someone who didn't cave to his verbal brow-beating, and broke through to a group of peers who were likely to take the charge of rape seriously. Instead of caring about the person or his peer groups, Elliot famously declared a new set of rules around consent and dog hairs, demanding everyone around him take his framework seriously.
 
Probably a power differential. I bet the common thread is that all of his partners are easy to control, and won't speak up to contradict him.
That creepy collar he wears everywhere is a BDSM submissive thing. His husband "Elly" (who also works at Google and likely has power, influence, and money of his own) wrote about it here:

Elly Fong-Jones said:
In our relationship the transfer of power is somewhat overt - I am the dominant partner and Liz is the submissive partner (usually!) and this is the way we both enjoy it. Liz enjoys being... well, dominated, for want of a better term - having a partner that is more confident and powerful than she is. I enjoy being that partner.

Obviously power as a fetish and actual power don't have to be the same thing, and it sounds like he's into switch too, so you could still be right, but I think the simpler explanation is that his partners share his kinks like someone wrote above. It makes a lot of sense to me that if your entire lifestyle is a fetish, instead of attractive partners you just need ones that reinforce that fetish, since your fetish has completely replaced normal human sexuality.
 
Liz Fong-Jones seems to think that approximately 80-95% of Jews shouldn't be entitled to a stage, and/or should be heckled if they are.
liz fong jones hates jews.png (archive)
 
Liz Fong-Jones seems to think that approximately 80-95% of Jews shouldn't be entitled to a stage, and/or should be heckled if they are.
View attachment 7203483 (archive)
I think it's remarkable how he has to couch things in a left-acceptable way. He can't just come out and say he opposes freedom of speech and expression because that's what allows us to talk about him is such a variety of unflattering ways. So he how can he shame and demand this horrible man be ushered from pubic view and his words unheard by all of right thinking society? How can he declare his desire for authoritarianism (but only the kind where he is in charge)? By dressing up his antisemitism in the current fashion.

Those who would be saviors are nothing if the oppressed are capable of defending themselves.

Oh, and remember those weird anti-capitalist stickers with stolen art he was giving out at some convention? I remember a country that has actually functional planned agricultural communities. It's the one he thinks needs to be raped consent accidented off the face of the earth.
 
I saw this video about Chinese eunuchs smelling like piss and thought of Elliot. I thought I would share it with you all:
Archive is attached to this post.
Remember guys, there’s a reason Elliot acts out the way he does. And that reason is, more often than not, that he paid serious money for someone to mangle his cock into a hideously corrosive swamp eating away at his pelvis. That’s what he gets for trying to buy womanhood from a store.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I saw this video about Chinese eunuchs smelling like piss and thought of Elliot. I thought I would share it with you all:
Archive is attached to this post.
Remember guys, there’s a reason Elliot acts out the way he does. And that reason is, more often than not, that he paid serious money for someone to mangle his cock into a hideously corrosive swamp eating away at his pelvis. That’s what he gets for trying to buy womanhood from a store.
we can add this to the part where Erriot wears the same purple lipstick for days (possibly weeks) on end and doesn't bathe or shower regularly, probably because it stings his axe wound equivalent to pouring rubbing alcohol on a severed limb

HAI ERRIOT
CHING BONG BING BONG DING DONG
YOU STINK RIKE PISS
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
Back