Opinions on SAVE Act (affects women)

We Are The Witches

True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
What is going on in the USA is impressive, apparently a bill (the "Safeguard American Voter Eligibility, or SAVE Act") was passed, and it requires individuals to present a passport, birth certificate or any citizenship document when going to vote or updating voting registration information.

So it is argued that this will make it harder for married women to vote, because about 69 million of them don't have a birth certificate that matches their legal name.


One article about it:
https://19thnews.org/2025/04/save-act-house-voting/
https://archive.md/Z8Xwj

And one video about it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSeCoXL5cj4
https://preservetube.com/watch?v=WSeCoXL5cj4


Here are some funny comments about this agenda:
a_1.png

a_2.png

a_3.png

a_4.png

a_5.png

a_6.png

a_7.png
 
This is retarded to oppose. You can get any certificate of marriage or divorce from the county it occurred in. If you have to pay, it's because you lost your original somehow. All of my elderly married relatives, including a grandmother who remarried very late in life after her first husband passed, had NO problems with getting their ID's changed (and ofc notifying social security which is pretty easy).

Once again people taking the outliers and making ridiculous arguments (which, ironically, would be people who were born at home waaay out in rural bumfuck WV, and more than likely white). And it would disproportionally NOT affect black women, as they don't fucking get married.
 
So it is argued that this will make it harder for married women to vote, because about 69 million of them don't have a birth certificate that matches their legal name.
You'd think since Trump remarried a couple times, somebody would be aware of that glaring loophole.

All of my elderly married relatives, including a grandmother who remarried very late in life after her first husband passed, had NO problems with getting their ID's changed (and ofc notifying social security which is pretty easy).
Don't you need paperwork to legally change your name, married or not? Is it required to update your IDs if you get a new last name?
 
So it is argued that this will make it harder for married women to vote, because about 69 million of them don't have a birth certificate that matches their legal name.
How did the new name become legal then? It's some third world retardation that people who change names don't get standalone documents that represent their current legal identity ("this is John Smith"). If they don't even get "incremental update" documents that sum up to their current identity ("this is Moshe Steinberg" + "Moshe Steinberg is now John Smith"), (1) this is just batshit insane, and (2) people who deliberately do legally significant actions that deprive them of a legal identity deserve to lose the right to voot.

(To clarify, I don't believe the US actually work this way. But if they do, top kek.)
 
Don't you need paperwork to legally change your name, married or not? Is it required to update your IDs if you get a new last name?
Usually when you marry, your certificate of marriage is all you need to go on to change your DL and SS card. If you divorce and want to change back to a maiden name, you get your divorce cert and do the same. To get a passport it's a copy of your birth certificate and any documentation to prove name changes. It's honestly not that hard and as I said, every courthouse in the country retains copies of these records. They're called vital records for a reason.
 
Then you're part of the cool kids' club and you might get a free fentanyl in your mailbox.
Kewl Kids Klub*

This whole situation is retarded as fuck. Most states require a $25 fee to get a legal (actual copy) of your birth certificate and changing your name legally requires taking that and your marriage license (which is required for marriage) to your local SSA (could even be the town hall in some places) and just going "I need to my change my legal name because I got married." They'll give you a temporary ID (which will work for voting under SAFE) and you'll get your official one in a couple months time. It's like an hour to two hour process, I've had sisters go through this and several friends. If you don't have an ID that matches your new married name, it's because you're lazy or dumb.
 
Wouldn't one of those gay-ass REALID driver's licenses count as proof of citizenship, seeing as you need your birth certificate/passport to get one in the first place?
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: The Last Stand
If this was an actual issue, it wouldn't effect only women, as cucks like idubbbz took Anisa's last name. So, if real, this would make it harder for cucks like Ian to vote.

Make of that what you will.
I was going to say this was epic but then that means Anisa could still vote. I do think we need a constitutional amendment to ensure cucks can't vote, since they aren't men anymore.
 
All the concerns, complaints, and efforts to stymie the bill seem like the latest efforts in gaslighting the public into believing that requiring any sort of proof f identity/citizenship to vote is somehow oppressive to women, minorities, and the people that shouldn't be voting anyways (but still do).

As others have already posted or suggested, it makes no sense when the financial and medical fields already require similar verification upon checking in for services. Furthermore, identity theft in other contexts runs absolutely rampant these days and a lot of other fields are implementing some sort of validation process to curtail that. So, the pearl clutching over verifying one's self to vote makes no sense - apart from those areas that are deep blue strongholds or those that allow the "undocumented" to vote in state and local elections with safeguards that are more holey than a block of Swiss cheese 🧀.
 
Back