Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 14.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 110 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 80 18.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 182 41.2%

  • Total voters
    442
I don't know what's happening with this site, but it's back up, all in white. Here's Aaron's clapback and Keanu piling on.

Screenshot 2025-04-13 at 12.38.32 AM.webpScreenshot 2025-04-13 at 1.49.02 AM.webp
 
You know 6,000 dollars for a signature can go a long way April if you read this. Its certainly one of the easiest things you've ever done for fast cash.

If April releases the footage for $6k, I hope that value becomes the ANUS (April-Nick Universal Standard) pegged to 120x a KNU. Make it happen April. We'll even stop talking about your gross feminine hygiene.

She's probably getting paid more than $6,000 by Nick's mother to *not* agree to release the bodycam.
So the calls for April to claim the cash probably aren't going to work, until mommy stops protecting her retarded son from consequences.
 
Look at all the great legal advice you can get from Nick. It's legal to piss on people's graves. It's legal to deface property. If someone leaves their front door unlocked it's okay to burglarize their house.

What a fucking retard.
The delicious aspect being that because he actually thought that, he likely wasn't covering his tracks even slightly.

I'm kinda curious juat how many people he shared with. I suppose the local police must have had something pretty solid to pass it up to the FBI.
 
I don't know what's happening with this site, but it's back up, all in white.
it's blinding me with whiteness
Nick, our era's lolcow extraordinaire, is such a fucking trainwreck right now that it's getting to be honestly beautiful in how all of the pieces are fitting together.
His life, his behavior, the shit that he still fucking says—it's all just so broken and dumb that it's god damned kino.

So why shouldn't the site be the same?

The tasteful off-white coloring, the darker panels, the subtle gradient... it even has green accents. My god...
my god.webp
 
Look at all the great legal advice you can get from Nick. It's legal to piss on people's graves. It's legal to deface property. If someone leaves their front door unlocked it's okay to burglarize their house.

What a fucking retard.
Listen, buddy, I know you got your degree from the Kiwi Couch but let me educate you a little bit. Of course it's legal to piss on their graves. If they weren't dead, you'd have to piss on them, and that's not legal, now is it? Defacing property? Of course that's legal. You know what's not legal? Vagrancy. Figure that one out. And you have locks for a reason, if you don't use them that's on you, pal. That's not even mentioning that you probably need to get renter's insurance in your little shitbox, I have a real house so of course I should be more worried than you about burglary!
:really:
 
Nice post, @Sneed Force One. I’ve used your timeline and added some other things I’ve archived along this saga, then made this video:
Using the Mass Effect Codex narrator (Neil Ross) and I believe the Baldur's Gate 3 narrator lady was a very nice touch on an already insanely good video.
 
I don't know what's happening with this site, but it's back up, all in white. Here's Aaron's clapback and Keanu piling on.
Nick plead guilty to his shit, we saw some of it happen on livestream (doing coke) but immediately after did a livestream tour explaining how he did none of it. For him to use “you admitted it” as an argument is moronic because in his world admittance means nothing.
 
Took her 10 months to pay $14.

Is she as broke as Ethan Ralph?
Coke whores are broke because they spend the $14 on coke.
You know what, though? She paid her debt. Which is more than Nick Moneybags Rekieta can say.

Apparently there's more to this than just catching up on an old court fee, because going off the statewide court fee schedule any past fee would have been $295.00 or $75.00 had she even filed any answer or motion for a temporarily contested case, which she never did:

DissolutionFees.webp

Instead the $14.00 paid on April 3rd could only have been to purchase a certified copy of something, most likely the final stipulated decree:

CertifiedCopyFee.webp

It's also notable that she never filed a written request for the certified copy to be mailed to her as would be the standard practice seen in other cases, meaning she (or perhaps someone pretending to be her licensed "attorney") must have personally driven all the way to the Willmar courthouse to purchase the certified copy over the counter in a hurry. For anyone to have gone to all that trouble, there must be something new going on bringing occasion for it. That's anyone's guess but there are only a few common reasons to even need a certified copy of a divorce decree:

1. To have it in a recordable form to update title to real property, which wouldn't apply here since she never had an interest in the Saint Cloud house, the divorce paperwork doesn't show her ever having been a spousal cosigner for any refinance of the Saint Cloud house, and Aaron dodged a bullet by not buying the whore shed to put half in her name like she wanted;

2. To file it with the DMV to update title to a motor vehicle, which shouldn't apply here since the truck Aaron bought for her was (IIRC) titled in her name already;

3. To file it alongside a marriage application to prove absence of bigamy, which shouldn't apply here since skelly wouldn't even start his own divorce in order to marry April until quite awhile after sentencing, and the short three months since sale of the whore shed would be a pretty quick turnaround for her to fool some other poor sucker into putting a ring on it (Horrifying.webp); or

4. To produce it to the DMV for a driver's license update, to an employer's payroll department, or to a bank or other account administrators, solely to implement her name change wherever possible, to lessen the number of people that may see her married name and stumble upon its horrifying google results.

It's probably just #4, but fingers crossed that it's #3 because Nick's reaction to it would be much funnier.


Okay, why don't they block each other? Brokeback Mountain is getting boring.
Screenshot 2025-04-12 at 8.35.22 PM.png

It may have been worth it just to watch what happens when the self-proclaimed "social media expert" for once forgets to tag the usual gaggle of MAPton orbiters it takes to ensure that a rough majority of responses rise to his defense, and instead his misguided attempt at flying solo just invited one of his worst Xitter shellackings in recent memory:

Brutal.webp

As if that wholesale abandonment by his once-formidable army of 159K Xitter followers wasn't going to make him seethe enough, of course he had to crawl back to his hidey-hole for more radio silence ever since the coup de grace:

Heater.webp

Brutal2.webp

Stahp.webp


How is constantly subjecting himself to this cruel and unusual punishment supposed to get him in the right "mental state" to stream on Friday?
 
Last edited:
For anyone to have gone to all that trouble, there must be something new going on bringing occasion for it.
April had her lastname change back to Anderson as part of the divorce, but has not yet changed it properly.
To change her name and with any agencies requires her to provide certified court documents.

She is legally required to notify certain agencies, for example police/court, DMV, etc.
 
The concerning aspect for Nick will be the enhancements calculations. You start off with a base level, but then you keep adding points after.

So, for example, you start with 6 points. Starting 7 points if the wire fraud is proven.

You then add 2 points for sharing with multiple people. +4 if more than ten.

+ 2 points for accessing privileged information.

+ 2 points with sharing with the intent to embarass.

+ 2 points for posting something like a porn browsing history.

+ 2 points for sophisticated means (that includes accessing some gmail left logged in)

+ 2 points, minimum, if it is shown the information accessed caused financial loss to Aaron, like the pitch job at radio, or if Aaron incurred attorney costs to recover from it. It might get to +6 points.

If he lies along the way, or deletes stuff, +2.

Identify theft if he say accessed Aaron's SSN. +2.

Then, a big one. +6 for witness retaliation.

If Nick had just done the base level, jail time would be unlikely, but because you get enhancements it then makes jail time of at least a couple of years likely.

I'm not a lawyer, I just looked up the points calculation.

Because Nick actually thought he was within his rights, he likely automatically hit a lot of enhancements when we was on his crusade.
 
I'm not a lawyer, I just looked up the points calculation.
Is there a +X for repeating the actions?
Or would each separate account illegally accessed be a brand new crime and charge?

Because Melton insinuated at some point something like "think about how important email addresses and and what else could be accessed with it", then pretty straight up admitting they did this with the YouTube account (which is also google, so might be same charge), but also PayPal and other finance apps to track his donation income.

It isn't just the one Google account, it is a plethora of compromised accounts and I really wonder if each different website log in would be treated as a separate "hacking" incident, which would then be repeated X times over many months to keep track of Aaron's activity and finances.

This could easy escalate into a pretty big number depending on how the state decides to charge this.

[EDIT] I also wonder if there is an extra charges for different types of accounts. It is one thing to access someone's Instagram, but accessing someone's bank accounts is another level of criminal behavior. Are those charged the same? (PayPal is legally considered a bank)
 
Is there a +X for repeating the actions?
Or would each separate account illegally accessed be a brand new crime and charge?

Because Melton insinuated at some point something like "think about how important email addresses and and what else could be accessed with it", then pretty straight up admitting they did this with the YouTube account (which is also google, so might be same charge), but also PayPal and other finance apps to track his donation income.

It isn't just the one Google account, it is a plethora of compromised accounts and I really wonder if each different website log in would be treated as a separate "hacking" incident, which would then be repeated X times over many months to keep track of Aaron's activity and finances.

This could easy escalate into a pretty big number depending on how the state decides to charge this.

[EDIT] I also wonder if there is an extra charges for different types of accounts. It is one thing to access someone's Instagram, but accessing someone's bank accounts is another level of criminal behavior. Are those charged the same? (PayPal is legally considered a bank)
It's generally not counted separately, but you can get extra points by + 2 for substantial invasion of privacy. + 2 tampering if say they removed mods and stuff, which I believe was speculated.

Further still if they get creative with how they estimate loss. What costs have they caused Aaton, particularly. Either direct costs or lossed revenue or reputational harm.

The biggest thing about accessing multiple platforms is you strengthen the points calculation already. So, if you had +2 for sophisticated means and you are then shown to have accessed further things, not just gmail, you decrease the chance of a plea down. Same for all those other points calculations. You essentially increase the harm and that increases the points. It isn't calculated per service accessed.

So, the stronger justification per enhancement, the less likely of a plea down or being sentenced at the lower end.

Nick will likely get two years minimum, possibly up to 7 years if they charge him with that enhancement for witness intimidation. The multiple times and persistence then keeps him on the higher sentencing guideline.

Hope that makes sense.
 
Last edited:
If she admitted, "We took private nudes that were never shared with you because I actually felt a bond with Aaron" it would probably cause Nick to put the Rustang into a tree at 110mph.
Considering that according to skelly, Aaron will show her slatternly nudes to strangers, her bod is anything but a public fixture. Like some weird statue. It's public property. She's the Minnesotan Minibus. Carries a lot, time to queue up. :really:

I've seen nothing to verify said rumor, but I believe it.
Screenshot 2025-04-12 at 8.34.28 PM.png
Whoever this is has the Patrick Tomlinson Rickisms on "dead to rights".
 
It isn't calculated per service accessed.
That really is too bad, but the number of different charges is already pretty high.

Luckily the wire fraud charge for accessing PayPal (bank account) already has an upper cap of 20 years imprisonment and 250000$ in fines.
With all these aggravating factors this could get real expensive for Nicky and his pet retard.

I wonder at what point Melton really starts to sweat it.
 
Back