Female-aimed Trends That You Hate? - Sperg about recent trends you despise from media, make-up, social, etc

Falsies are so bad that they loop around a lot of the time to making someone look the opposite of intended. Enhancing your lashes is meant to foremost enhance your eyes. Those super long and thick falsies and all the extra shit just makes a lot of people's eyes look squinted and demonically possessed because they almost look entirely black, especially in photos.
 
•The push for exaggerated lips and eyelashes gives me flashbacks to the mid 2000s middle aged Moms

•Pushing anything related to the Kardashians. I never got the appeal of them, and most of their products are shams.

•Tight fitting dresses with boob and back windows. They almost always come in the most boring of colors that don't suit most skin tones.

•The “sad beige mom” trend from TikTok a couple years back proves that you can have too much of a good thing. A neutral color is meant to contrast with something bold and/or bright to make it more eye catching.

•I’m not a fan of long fake nails outside of Halloween.

•Any sex related article in women’s magazines, because its always about pleasing Moids. It’s more irksome because you rarely see men’s magazines write up articles like “How to please your wife/Understanding your wife’s needs in the bedroom”. How often do you see “proper foreplay with women” articles compared to how often kinks are pushed towards women?

•Speaking of “kinks”, I'm going to address an elephant in the room. The vast majority of people online you run into with weird fetishes are Moids and trannies 95% of the time. Most of these fetishes are extensively featured in the “Deviantart Horrors” thread over in community watch, many of which involve degrading women (and children) in some capacity. “Kink shaming” is just a term made by autistic Moids who want to degrade women in art.

I hate that women are supposed to be empathetic towards fetishists. Women who point out this stuff gets dog piled on social media.

•Surrogacy. You will never change my mind on the fact that the industry is evil and unethical. It takes advantage of vulnerable women in impoverished countries while overwhelming already underfunded orphanages (most of which have kids that are surrogate rejects), and it has the potential to cause trauma on the infants that they won't be able to contextualize until they're much older. Presenting it as “empowering” is disgusting.

•Then finally, the normalization of prostitution has done a lot more harm than good. It is common knowledge that the only men who buy prostitutes aren't good men; they're looking for someone to sexually degrade or to kill. “Paid rape” is an accurate descriptor of the job from everything I've read from testimonials.

Good men also don't buy OF subscriptions; only socially maladjusted Moids do. When you become an E-prostitute, you end up being stuck to deal with actual stalkers and the worst of the worst humanity has to offer.
 
•Surrogacy. You will never change my mind on the fact that the industry is evil and unethical. It takes advantage of vulnerable women in impoverished countries while overwhelming already underfunded orphanages (most of which have kids that are surrogate rejects), and it has the potential to cause trauma on the infants that they won't be able to contextualize until they're much older. Presenting it as “empowering” is disgusting.
The entire fertility industry is evil. Surrogacy weaponizes empathy on close loved ones who would consider it and otherwise targets poor women. Especially from impoverished backgrounds from non-western countries. But in some western countries too sometimes. They also target young women for egg harvesting despite how invasive it is and the side-effects. If you have a baby through IVF that baby may also have issues with fertility. Some whacko doctors use their own sperm or otherwise they just randomize that shit and there is no actual guarantee you get the sperm from the donor you picked.

I think it is selfish and vain to expect another woman to go through pregnancy just so you don't have to or to bear that burden simply because you aren't able to. It's willful ignorance to ignore the realities that might make a woman consider doing it--you HAVE to know that given other option she wouldn't do it and that you're taking advantage of the fact another woman is in a very disadvantaged position. (The conditions some of these women are kept in is just horrific as well.) To say nothing of when it's just men doing it to harvest babies.

It's all just genetic and baby trafficking. It's presented as altruistic and an option for people who can't conceive but it's just an awful, awful industry.

The only option that isn't evil is when you discover your hubby is shooting blanks and you get a turkey baster of someone else's jizz. Anything beyond that is wrong. Sorry for the sperg.
 
To illustrate the egg '''donation'' shit, there was a case of death and one near-death because of internal bleeding at the same local fertility clinic, the living one had about 4,5 litres of blood sucked out of her abdominal cavity in the hospital, and it makes me wonder how was this even survivable. It was across the news, but that particular clinic and the responsible ...doctor were never named anywhere, it must be because both the business and local police are owned by local mafia. And the living one got paid something and/or extorted to shut up and let the court drop the case. It can be assumed many other girls ended up with serious health problems, but they got silenced with money and threats too and it just did not make into the news.

Aaand how much those ''donors'' get, you ask? It was about 400euro/450dollars back then, and apart from all the hormonal shit, it also comes with general anaesthesia.

Such is life in glorious Arstotzka.
 
Depicting yourself as a lamb/deer/bunny
I'm a cat myself
1744592444069.webp
 
Blame BookTok for promoting these kinds of books and defending them (I know I'm a moid, but the smut and slopification of books has affected both sexes).
I'm tired of people pretending this isn't true.

I don't care what anyone else says. I refuse to believe that this shit hasn't been rotting the brains of women, too.
 
Surrogacy weaponizes empathy on close loved ones who would consider it and otherwise targets poor women.
Surrogacy also sets up the legal infrastructure that allows children to be commissioned, created and sold. The alteration of birth certificates, the idea that taking a baby from its mother is fine. The idea of gay couples commissioning babies (always boys) as brave and stunning rather than buying a child. It allows all these legal things to be put in place that weaken the parental link and responsibility/rights and make it easier for the state to take children. The Troon agenda does that too - changed birth certificates, falsified records, take the kids if you don’t affirm them etc.
Nothing about surrogacy is good. It’s exploitation by f the women whose wombs are used, and it’s allowing normalisation of legal acts that are basically buying and selling human life. It is evil to it’s core
 
@Kiwisee
Any sex related article in women’s magazines, because its always about pleasing Moids. It’s more irksome because you rarely see men’s magazines write up articles like “How to please your wife/Understanding your wife’s needs in the bedroom”. How often do you see “proper foreplay with women” articles compared to how often kinks are pushed towards women?
A few years ago I recall seeing on a Cosmopolitan magazine cover "tips and tricks on how to please your man" that included blow jobs and wrapping hair ties around his balls so he wouldn't ejaculate too quickly. Nothing on women's health, what to demand from men, how to look for red flags, etc. Men's magazines don't ever talk about pleasing their women - the onus is on the woman to please her man so he doesn't turn to porn or leave her.
I'm tired of people pretending this isn't true.

I don't care what anyone else says. I refuse to believe that this shit hasn't been rotting the brains of women, too.
It's very fitting you have a Noctis icon because the four male leads of Final Fantasy XV are all paired together and the only plots involving them are pornographic. Not even Final Fantasy XVI is that popular.
 
I hate twee quotes on women’s graphic tees.
 
I am still amazed that pulling pants up above the belly button became acceptable
Some can be very comfy (I'm a grandma at heart).

I suppose this is like a fashion trend, but I see more and more women not wearing bras. I see them everywhere, even in formal places. It's usually millennial women and younger, I rarely see a middle-aged lady without a bra.
It really annoys me, I don't know why. It's not even a sexual thing, but I can't help glancing at their chests. I'd feel too self-conscious if I'd go out in public without a bra.
For example, a few weeks ago I had an appointment with a doctor. She was very good (which is rare, good luck finding a doctor who gives a shit about you nowadays), but this lady wasn't wearing a bra and her nipples were kind of protruding through her blouse. So I had to stare directly at her face all the time, because, you know, I didn't want to be rude. What kind of professional dresses like that?
 
Girl's girl, girl math, i'm just a girl, girlboss, all the infantilizing tiktok shit that's spreading everywhere. Western slay girl feminism in general. It's so fucking out of touch.

Speaking of girlbossing, now i've noticed the tide is turning (west europe and the usa) because everyone is like wahhh where are the real men at, they're so feminine, they act like princesses and no one will approach me. Girl, you cut their balls off and now you're complaining?

The thing is, both macho men and that mullet having, twink look alike, pretending to be a feminist for pussy man with nail polish are both as likely to cheat on you, hurt you, beat the shit of you if they had it in them in the first place. The difference is if both were decent people, you would be better off with the "manly man".
 
I can't be the only one with a severe hatred for women's underwear and how it's so often cut to be exposing and flimsy, made of garbage materials which harm genital health, and then absurdly expensive to boot. I see stuff advertised like "Cut with lower coverage to show a little cheek ;)" like that's supposed to be a selling point when it always just means it'll sit weirdly and uncomfortably. Even briefs and boyshorts sold as basics, which are supposed to be full-coverage, are often cropped. I'm not a utilitarian minimalist about clothes though, so I also hate how anything with a fancy design is promoted with a focus on sex appeal to men. I just think lace and bows are cute, why does it have to feel like a porn ad? (:_( In the end I took the men's boxer briefs pill and I'm never going back.

On a related note a lot of women's swimwear is getting ridiculous, just seems like they're designed for sex appeal at the expense of practicality. I don't think everyone wearing it is seeking that kind of attention necessarily but I am very suspicious of the people normalizing it. I think it's dumb that swimwear that looks more like a normal top and shorts/skort is fringe while being more exposed than you would be in normal underwear is the norm.
 
Back