US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeh who can forget Kevin McCarthy's debacle where he said that men should stop playing video games and get a job because they are abusing programs meant for single moms. He attacked the young men who helped trump win to defend the single moms the republicans clam to hate and who vote against them.. This is the populist we had to replace Mike Johnson for ?
Are you calling either Kevin McCarthy or Mike Johnson a populist? Neither of them are. Mike Johnson replaced Kevin McCarthy. McCarthy was antagonist to MAGA. Johnson will accommodate MAGA if the political "winds" blow hard enough or Trump bullies him enough.
 
Your context was “I didn’t say that!”

The only hedge in that was “somewhat ironic”. “Somewhat” is less than half, isn’t it? And then you filled it out with “when MY office downsizes, they don’t even hire me new assistants! Gasp!” so I was supposed to empathize with you, after you pretended moral superiority by implying you never tab out from your spreadsheet
What is up with you today? Why are you picking fights over every little thing?
 
Your context was “I didn’t say that!”

The only hedge in that was “somewhat ironic”. “Somewhat” is less than half, isn’t it? And then you filled it out with “when MY office downsizes, they don’t even hire me new assistants! Gasp!” so I was supposed to empathize with you, after you pretended moral superiority by implying you never tab out from your spreadsheet
Jesus Christ.

1) I did not, in fact, say what you've ascribed to me.

2) The context I gave you was partly "I thought you were talking about an IT job" and mostly "these are things that happen." At no point did I endorse (what I, incidentally, consider over-blunt and often ultimately non-smart) corporate "efficiency efforts." But they happen, which was the point. And one thing they do when they're doing that is assess productivity and capacity. Fucking DUH.

As for the "at my workplace...," that was descriptive of my experience and had zero to do with you or your fucking work or work ethic. And I sure as fuck wasn't looking for your empathy.

As for the "somewhat ironic" reference to "smart" as a descriptor: again, I don't consider efficiency to be an absolute good (thus my scare quotes and reference to irony), but in the corporate world, euphemisms like "right-sizing" or "smart this-or-that" are also not always 100% incorrect. However, they usually don't get it right and often wind up dehumanizing the people who keep the lights on (even the spreadsheeters and chatbot placeholders, who are also people, Mr. Moral Superiority).

If you do not understand the concept of measured judgment, or that a comment might not be all about you, sorry, man.
 
Africa is primed to become a rare earth resource proxy conflict battlefield isn't it.
Copper and cobalt are way more valuable and rare than lithium. The DRC has been an absolute shitshow for all of human existence, though, and I would not like to be involved in tard wrangling that chimp hive for any amount of shinies.
 
did not, in fact, say what you've ascribed to me.
You did.
The "smart" company (somewhat ironic - I mean companies looking for efficiencies) would re-size jobs like yours so that you don't have time to do that - you'd be doing other things while x thing is running. In my world, we're not backfilling positions - when someone leaves or is terminated, the remaining employees just have to take on more.
"The company (you work for) if it was smart (partly serious, somewhat ironic) and looking to increase efficiency (which means the company you work for hasn't maximized efficiency) would re-size (fire you SpergioLeonne or one of your coworkers) your job and others like it so that you SpergioLeonne don't have time do that (waste time doing inefficient things).
- you SpergioLeonne would be doing other work (instead of fucking around posting on KiwiFarms). In my world (unlike yours), we (the company I work for, which is obviously more efficiency minded than yours) are not backfilling positions (the efficient thing to do).
- when someone leaves or is terminated (something efficient companies do), the remaining employees (like me, and not like you) just have to take on more work (because we don't have the luxury of working at inefficient workplaces like yours, and we take on extra work instead of fucking around)."

Your "apology" amounted to saying the insults would be diserved if it was an IT job. And denying you said anything insulting; the equivalent to saying "shut up faggot, I didn't insult you".

The reason SpergioLeonne thought you worked a soft job like HR is because saying what you said would get you in a fist fight if said in person, while refusing to back down like you did.
 
Last edited:
The reason SpergioLeonne thought you worked a soft job like HR is because saying what you said would get you in a fist fight if said in person, while refusing to back down like you did.
For a guy with Spergio in his name, they should have considered that the person they were talking to had another reason for behaving that way. After all:

The Jew did not in the least remember the day before, he continued to talk in the same old strain as if nothing had happened, and if indignantly confronted, he pretended to be astonished and could not remember anything except that his assertions
had already been proved true the day before.

Often I was stunned. One did not know what to admire more: their glibness of
tongue or their skill in lying.

I gradually began to hate them.
 
"Back in my day", being clean-shaven and with no visible tattoos was the norm for professionalism. How'd that change in Current Year?
This is some mighty pearl clutching. Imagine seeing a dude with a tattoo of Ethan Ralph pushing corn up his ass while crying on his chest.

You know that nigga would be the coolest dude alive.
 
ESPN host Stephen Smith really truly is considering a presidential campaign. He says people asking him to run is an indictment of the Democratic Party. 2028 feels like a hundred years away in politics so we'll see what happens with him.
This has been foreseeable ever since he started positioning himself as a "sane" liberal who "understands why Trump won."
A few of the smarter Dems have finally learned that socialist bullshit and appealing to troons is a losing strategy, so they're trying to set the groundwork as flag bearer.
Why that dipshit Cory Booker seems to think he'll ever be nominee is beyond me though.
 
Back