If it helps at all, I'm a native English speaker who grew up around AAVE and also still had some difficulty with this one. Here's a partial transcript:
Dotta #1: "Ah'm da Gripbaby dotta, [unintelligible]!"
Dotta #2: "Ah'm not Gripbaby; ah'm Gripbaby dotta, [unintelligible]."
Dotta #3: [mostly unintelligible]
Dotta #4: "Ah'm not Gripbaby; ah'm Gripbaby
big dotta Meeracul; u awreddy kno who it iz!
U KNO!!!"
Son: "Ah'm not Gripbaby; ah'm Gripbaby oldest son; [trails off into unintelligibility]."
Sheboon Matriarch: "Ah'm not Gripbaby; ah'm Gripbaby's momma, betta known az Lady J."
Gripbaby: "
AH'M GRIPBABY; U AWREDDY KNO!!! [etc.]"
[assorted nigger bullshit and twerking]
In other news, here's a recent article / video from American Renaissance:
"When people who hate me get tired of calling me a fascist or a white supremacist, they let fly with 'eugenicist.' But 'eugenicist' may be losing its sting. Just last week, the
New York Times astonished me by publishing an article called 'Should Human Life be Optimized?' It included moving pictures of cute babies who had, in some respects, been optimized.
It even used the term 'liberal eugenics,' to refer to the latest techniques to ensure children get the best genetic start in life by using a method called embryo selection. It works like this: You harvest eggs from the mother, fertilize them with sperm from the father, and after about 5 or 6 days, you sequence the genomes of all the embryos and then implant the ones that have the most promising traits.
...
After the Second World War, a kind of insanity took over that is only now beginning to fade. The title of the
Times article I started with is a question: Should we optimize human life? Of course we should. That’s what education, health care, culture, and technology are all about. You could argue that if we have the means to improve our species, we have a duty to improve it.
What has held us back for decades is the fear that if we start taking human genetics seriously again, we can no longer pretend there aren’t genetic differences between races. We’ve even gone through a period when we’re supposed to pretend that race has nothing to do with genes or biology — that it’s a 'social construct.'"
In a back-and-forth I had with anti-racist geneticist Kevin Bird on social media some years ago, I was trying to get him to admit that the prospect of modern eugenics was not just flaky sci-fi nonsense by pointing out that Down syndrome has been effectively aborted out of existence in Iceland. I asked "aren't you pro-choice?" and got a bunch of responses like "yes
buuuuut...". The discomfort was very palpable. I think we are only witnessing the beginning of said discomfort. Further reading / listening I've mentioned here before:
(mainstream geneticist admits racial genetic differences are real)
On that note, is there really any one single policy that could do more to rein in crime (esp. violent crime) in this country than phasing out nigger genetics?
