- Joined
- Feb 14, 2025
The conspiracy might have truth, but it's as if it's purposefully muddied, to make you spend your time focusing on specific details to argue about, a distraction. You already know they are lying. about the past. Why argue exactly what they are lying about? They are lying, you can't trust anything. I try to avoid anything near mainstream as much as possible. Unless they are marked mainstream as the "crazy person" designed to discredit any investigation. Example belowI've been into this one for a while. Nowadays it seems to have become more complicated, with the claim that Jesus' millenial reign had already happened and the tartarian civilization appeared at it's end or something like that. Not sure what to make of these new developments. Do you browse stolen history(-ies)?
Last edited: