US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's just crazy seeing it in real life, not online and I guess all of the other former Dems I know were "former" when I met them.
I m not surprised.

If you take away the psyop NPC programing. You have a fucking 1990s new york democrat. Trump pulling tulsi and RFK was a fucking genus move it give him credibility.

The other thing trump is proving with the border (Not just counting deportations) just the border is that the Admin has the power to do things.

Same with ending USAID and the DOE.

Someone made a remark about biden. He s a C student who thinks he's an A student. Basically biden was not up to the job.

So this Dem has to deal with his side opposing their own people for taking a spot in this admin and doing what they want to do. The fact that his own side just wants to be angry, and infight after comming off of a 4 year admin that was an old man that didnt do shit while his theatre kid staff made white house christmas video with "DANCING NIGGERS"
 
Does the Alien Enemies Act not bypass that? Also,
>Indira Talwani
>Obama appointee
My hate is fueled once more.
He could probably deport them if he chose to. Since the act was mentioned, I wanted to give an interesting tidbit about the act. in 1948, the Supreme Court held that the only determinations a court can make regarding the Alien Enemy Act is whether the factual basis for President's proclamations are truthful, i.e. if President activated his powers because of war, then the court can review whether there is war. Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U.S. 160, 68 S. Ct. 1429, 92 L. Ed. 1881 (1948). This year, the Supreme Court partly overruled this. In Trump v. J. G. G., 604 U. S. ____ (2025), the court instead claimed that the courts can only review whether the act itself is constitutional (in 1948 Supreme Court determined that it obviously was) and whether the alien fits within the President's determinations - but, not the determinations themselves.

I found that pretty interesting.
 
He could probably deport them if he chose to. Since the act was mentioned, I wanted to give an interesting tidbit about the act. in 1948, the Supreme Court held that the only determinations a court can make regarding the Alien Enemy Act is whether the factual basis for President's proclamations are truthful, i.e. if President activated his powers because of war, then the court can review whether there is war. Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U.S. 160, 68 S. Ct. 1429, 92 L. Ed. 1881 (1948). This year, the Supreme Court partly overruled this. In Trump v. J. G. G., 604 U. S. ____ (2025), the court instead claimed that the courts can only review whether the act itself is constitutional (in 1948 Supreme Court determined that it obviously was) and whether the alien fits within the President's determinations - but, not the determinations themselves.

I found that pretty interesting.
It sounds like then the Judge is just being a prick. Trump should ignore him like with that MS-13 fence hopper they keep bleating about.
 
Jesus christ, the women turning around like Invasion of the Body Snatchers on detection of thoughtcrime
I mean I wouldn’t expect actual humans to support carney. Someone should rile up the French Canadians by pointing out how he’s actually British and it reinforces the queen being on their currency and how Canada is a British client state

@(°▽°) that’s how it happened in Poland, also about illegal immigration
 
Back