Well, I have had my fun with this topic, but I think it's high time we shelve this little diversion.
Let's use Occams razor for a moment; if we were to take
@Big Bang for his word, we would have to accept that, from the inception of the account, ERFA was another person who put in hundreds of hours every week, for weeks and weeks on end essentially role-playing and skinwalking Trunchbull, keeping personal details perfectly consistent across months and months of posting, mirroring her racial makeup, sexuality, interests, field of study and personal beliefs with an autistic attention to detail, in order to PURPOSELY get identified as Trunchbull, eventually, as part of a convoluted revenge plot.
If the entire point of putting in hundreds on hundreds of hours to frame Trunchbull as the author of the ERFA account by impersonating her... Why would ERFA deny any connection between the account and Trunchbull when pressed, to the point ERFA lied about identifying as japanese when it was brought up as a link between the two?
Why then, take it a step further and create a sock to further continue the narrative that ERFA is not Trunchbull?
If the ENTIRE POINT was to "frame" Trunchbull as being ERFA, why do all of this? Wouldn't it make more sense to confirm that that is the case when pressed? None of this makes ANY sense, even if you accept the theory that someone out there is autistic enough to skinwalk someone for the entire duration of ERFA's account.
I propose an alternate theory; ERFA is Trunchbull,
@Big Bang is lying to protect the reputation of a racist vitriolic furfag with a long history of lying because he doesn't believe consequences should apply to her, and is using screenshots of a spat Trunchbull had with someone three years ago to "prove" this. while all other evidence is conveniently deleted/unavailable.
